Deparment of Basic Veterinary Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Bayero University Kano, Kano, Nigeria.
J Chemother. 2021 Apr;33(2):67-84. doi: 10.1080/1120009X.2020.1868237. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
Since the announcement by the World Health Organization (WHO) of an outbreak of a contagious respiratory viral pneumonia in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 (later named as COVID-19), several research works have been carried out to unstitch the therapeutic options and combat the disease using various aproaches and modalities. These works are currently at different clinical trial stages, and their results may be determined by the outcome of the ongoing trial process. There is the need for a collection of information regarding the availlable therapeutic options related to COVID-19. this article therefore reviewed emerging and re-emerging therapeutic compounds/drugs used in COVID-19 management and reports of clinical trials, with the view to summarize and highlight their prospect and possible adverse effects to allow more extensive choice by clinicians, researchers, and policymakers. The approach used involved retrieval of related collections found in selected repositories including, Medline, Scopus, PubMed, and Google scholar. Only experimental or clinical studies were included. Out of the 39 materials retrieved, 26 (66.67%) studies were based on clinical trials, 12 (30.77%) were classified as studies, and only one (2.56%) involved experimental animal study. Of the agents evaluated for COVID-19 therapeutics, 15 (38.46%) were anti-viral, four (10.26%) antimalarial, four studies were immunotherapeutics (10.26%), two studies (5.13%) were antibacterial, while, one (2.56%) study wasfor antiparasitic , anticoagulant, anti-inflammatory, anti-viral/antimalarial, and anti-viral/herbal combination for each. Also, eight studies (20.51%) were antibiotic/antimalarial.. This review indicates that there is both a race and quest in the test of antiviral agents against COVID-19 and that arbidol seems to have dominated in the studies analyzed. The use of anticoagulants and antibiotics, such as teicoplanin and azithromycin/hydroxychloroquine were reported to also play a leading role in the management of the disease. Likewise, dexamethasone has been recently claimed to be effective in patients in need of respiratory assistance. Based on unresolved controversies and inconclusive findings, it could be said that generally, a single and specific therapeutics to COVID-19 is still a mirage. There is, thus, an urgent need to test more potent compounds and agents to establish much safer and highly efficacious drugs/agents for the disease, even as we continue to learn more about the disease as well as the characteristic of the virus.
自 2019 年 12 月中国世界卫生组织(WHO)宣布在武汉爆发传染性呼吸道病毒性肺炎(后命名为 COVID-19)以来,已经开展了多项研究工作,以利用各种方法和模式来探索治疗方法和抗击该疾病。这些工作目前处于不同的临床试验阶段,其结果可能取决于正在进行的试验过程的结果。需要收集有关与 COVID-19 相关的治疗选择的信息。因此,本文综述了用于 COVID-19 管理的新兴和重现的治疗化合物/药物的临床试验报告,旨在总结和强调它们的前景和可能的不良反应,以便临床医生、研究人员和决策者有更广泛的选择。所采用的方法涉及从选定的存储库中检索相关的文献,包括 Medline、Scopus、PubMed 和 Google Scholar。仅纳入了实验或临床研究。从检索到的 39 份材料中,有 26 份(66.67%)研究基于临床试验,12 份(30.77%)被归类为观察性研究,只有 1 份(2.56%)涉及实验动物研究。在评估用于 COVID-19 治疗的药物中,有 15 种(38.46%)是抗病毒药物,4 种(10.26%)是抗疟药物,4 种是免疫疗法(10.26%),2 种是抗菌药物(5.13%),1 种(2.56%)是抗寄生虫药物、抗凝剂、抗炎药、抗病毒/抗疟药物和抗病毒/草药组合。此外,还有 8 项研究(20.51%)是抗生素/抗疟药物。本综述表明,针对 COVID-19 的抗病毒药物测试存在竞争和探索,而利巴韦林在分析的研究中似乎占据主导地位。据报道,抗凝剂和抗生素,如替考拉宁和阿奇霉素/羟氯喹,在疾病管理中也发挥着重要作用。同样,地塞米松最近也被声称对需要呼吸支持的患者有效。基于未解决的争议和不确定的发现,可以说,一般来说,针对 COVID-19 的单一和特定治疗方法仍然是一个幻影。因此,迫切需要测试更有效的化合物和药物,以建立更安全和高效的药物/药物,同时我们继续更多地了解该疾病以及病毒的特征。