Mon-López Daniel, Bernardez-Vilaboa Ricardo, Sillero-Quintana Manuel, Alvarez Fernandez-Balbuena Antonio
Departamento de Deportes de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte-INEF de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain.
Department of Optometry and Vision, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Mar;22(3):336-343. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.1874540. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
Olympic shooting is a sport with high demands of accuracy. Minimal visual errors could be related to performance losses. However, not all visual skills have been studied in depth in this sport. The main objectives of this study were to compare differences in shooters' visual skills by level and to analyze the competition effect on them. Sixty-six participants were distributed in three groups (non-athletes, elite and non-elite). Eleven visual variables were tested in four skills groups (visual acuity, heterophoria, accommodation functions and other visual skills). The data were collected through a pre- and post-competition simulation test. The results of the study showed differences between groups by shooting sport level. In general, shooters had higher visual acuity values than non-athletes < .001 with large size effects ( between 1.01 and 2.35), and elite shooters presented higher values of accommodation than non-elite shooters < .05 with large size effects ( between 0.88 and 0.97). Furthermore, different visual skills were modified after competition depending on the shooting level. Specifically, visual accommodation skills were only improved in elite shooters. Finally, our study suggests that elite shooters employ different visual strategies or skills to non-elite shooters and that shooting activity is closely related to some specific visual skills. This aspect should be considered by coaches in the design of optimal visual trainings and improve the shooters' performance. Shooters showed better acuity skills than non-athletes.Shooting activity seems to improve visual acuity skills, binocular visual time and eye-hand coordination in non-elite shooters, and accommodation and eye-hand coordination in elite shooters immediately after the competition simulation.Elite shooters employ different visual strategies or skills to non-elite shooters.Non-dominant eye occlusion may benefit binocular vision recovery by inhibiting aiming action and the use of accommodative flexibility could be related to the QE during the shot.
奥运会射击是一项对准确性要求极高的运动。极小的视觉误差都可能导致成绩下滑。然而,并非所有视觉技能在这项运动中都得到了深入研究。本研究的主要目的是按水平比较射击运动员视觉技能的差异,并分析比赛对这些技能的影响。66名参与者被分为三组(非运动员、精英运动员和非精英运动员)。在四个技能组(视力、隐斜视、调节功能和其他视觉技能)中测试了11个视觉变量。数据通过赛前和赛后模拟测试收集。研究结果显示,不同射击运动水平的组间存在差异。总体而言,射击运动员的视力值高于非运动员(<0.001,大效应量,效应量在1.01至2.35之间),精英射击运动员的调节值高于非精英射击运动员(<0.05,大效应量,效应量在0.88至0.97之间)。此外,赛后不同的视觉技能根据射击水平有所变化。具体而言,仅精英射击运动员的视觉调节技能得到了提高。最后,我们的研究表明,精英射击运动员与非精英射击运动员采用不同的视觉策略或技能,并且射击活动与某些特定视觉技能密切相关。教练在设计最佳视觉训练时应考虑这一方面,以提高射击运动员的成绩。射击运动员的视力技能优于非运动员。在比赛模拟后,射击活动似乎能立即提高非精英射击运动员的视力技能、双眼视觉时间和手眼协调能力,以及精英射击运动员的调节能力和手眼协调能力。精英射击运动员与非精英射击运动员采用不同的视觉策略或技能。非优势眼遮挡可能通过抑制瞄准动作而有利于双眼视觉恢复,并且在射击过程中使用调节灵活性可能与QE有关。