• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者可访问的健康记录的使用如何有助于以患者为中心的护理:范围综述。

How the Use of a Patient-Accessible Health Record Contributes to Patient-Centered Care: Scoping Review.

机构信息

Icare JGZ, Meppel, Netherlands.

Chairgroup Consumption & Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e17655. doi: 10.2196/17655.

DOI:10.2196/17655
PMID:33427683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7834934/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, patient-centered care is becoming a widely used concept in medical practice, getting more and more attention because of its proven ability to improve quality of care and reduce costs. Although several studies show that patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) influence certain aspects of patient-centered care, the possible contribution of PAEHR implementation to patient-centered care as a comprehensive concept has not, to our knowledge, been structurally evaluated to date.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to review whether and how the use of PAEHRs contributes to patient-centered care both in general and among specific population groups.

METHODS

We followed PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines. We identified literature in 5 databases, using the terms "patient-accessible medical records," "patient experiences," and "professional experiences" as key concepts. A total of 49 articles were included and analyzed with a charting code list containing 10 elements of patient-centered care.

RESULTS

Studies were diverse in design, country of origin, functionalities of the investigated PAEHR, and target population. Participants in all studies were adults. Most studies reported positive influence of PAEHR use on patient-centered care; patient accessible health records were appreciated for their opportunity to empower patients, inform patients about their health, and involve patients in their own care. There were mixed results for the extent to which PAEHRs affected the relation between patients and clinicians. Professionals and patients in mental health care held opposing views concerning the impact of transparency, where professionals appeared more worried about potential negative impact of PAEHRs on the patient-clinician relationship. Their worries seemed to be influenced by a reluctant attitude toward patient-centered care. Disadvantaged groups appeared to have less access to and make less use of patient-accessible records than the average population but experienced more benefits than the average population when they actually used PAEHRs.

CONCLUSIONS

The review indicates that PAEHRs bear the potential to positively contribute to patient-centered care. However, concerns from professionals about the impact of transparency on the patient-clinician relationship as well as the importance of a patient-centered attitude need to be addressed. Potentially significant benefits for disadvantaged groups will be achieved only through easily accessible and user-friendly PAEHRs.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,以患者为中心的医疗照护正成为医疗实践中广泛应用的概念,因其能够提高医疗质量和降低成本而备受关注。尽管有几项研究表明,患者可获取的电子健康记录(PAEHR)会影响患者为中心的医疗照护的某些方面,但迄今为止,尚未从结构上评估 PAEHR 的实施作为一个全面概念对患者为中心的医疗照护的可能贡献。

目的

本研究旨在综述 PAEHR 的使用是否以及如何在总体上和特定人群中促进患者为中心的医疗照护。

方法

我们遵循 PRISMA 扩展用于范围综述的报告指南。我们使用“患者可获取的医疗记录”、“患者体验”和“专业人员体验”等关键概念,在 5 个数据库中确定文献。共纳入 49 篇文章,并使用包含 10 个患者为中心医疗照护要素的图表代码列表进行分析。

结果

研究设计、来源国、所调查的 PAEHR 功能以及目标人群差异较大。所有研究的参与者均为成年人。大多数研究报告称,PAEHR 的使用对患者为中心的医疗照护有积极影响;患者可获取的健康记录使患者能够获得授权、了解自己的健康状况并参与自己的医疗照护,从而受到赞赏。PAEHR 对患者与临床医生之间关系的影响程度存在差异。心理健康护理中的专业人员和患者对透明度的影响持有相反的观点,专业人员似乎更担心 PAEHR 对医患关系可能产生的负面影响。他们的担忧似乎受到对以患者为中心的医疗照护持抵触态度的影响。与一般人群相比,弱势群体获得和使用患者可获取记录的机会较少,但当他们实际使用 PAEHR 时,他们比一般人群获得更多的益处。

结论

综述表明,PAEHR 有可能对患者为中心的医疗照护产生积极影响。然而,专业人员对透明度对医患关系的影响的担忧以及对以患者为中心的态度的重要性需要得到解决。只有通过易于访问和用户友好的 PAEHR,才能为弱势群体带来潜在的重大益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d97/7834934/ce137282b2c4/jmir_v23i1e17655_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d97/7834934/ee06491bbdea/jmir_v23i1e17655_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d97/7834934/ce137282b2c4/jmir_v23i1e17655_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d97/7834934/ee06491bbdea/jmir_v23i1e17655_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d97/7834934/ce137282b2c4/jmir_v23i1e17655_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
How the Use of a Patient-Accessible Health Record Contributes to Patient-Centered Care: Scoping Review.患者可访问的健康记录的使用如何有助于以患者为中心的护理:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e17655. doi: 10.2196/17655.
2
Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records and Information Practices in Mental Health Care Contexts: Scoping Review.精神卫生保健背景下患者可访问的电子健康记录及信息实践:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 7;27:e54973. doi: 10.2196/54973.
3
Errors, Omissions, and Offenses in the Health Record of Mental Health Care Patients: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Sweden.精神卫生保健患者健康记录中的错误、遗漏和过失:来自瑞典全国性调查的结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 3;25:e47841. doi: 10.2196/47841.
4
"Nothing About Me Without Me": An Interpretative Review of Patient Accessible Electronic Health Records.“没有我参与,就没有与我相关的事”:对患者可获取的电子健康记录的解读性综述
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 29;17(6):e161. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4446.
5
Views, Use, and Experiences of Web-Based Access to Pediatric Electronic Health Records for Children, Adolescents, and Parents: Scoping Review.基于网络获取儿科电子健康记录供儿童、青少年及其家长使用的观点、使用情况和体验:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 22;24(11):e40328. doi: 10.2196/40328.
6
Experiences of Patients With Mental Health Issues Having Web-Based Access to Their Records: National Patient Survey.心理健康问题患者通过网络访问其记录的体验:全国患者调查。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Feb 2;11:e48008. doi: 10.2196/48008.
7
Users' Experiences With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Mental and Somatic Health Care: Cross-Sectional Study.用户在精神和躯体保健中在线访问电子健康记录的体验:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 25;25:e47840. doi: 10.2196/47840.
8
Changes in Documentation Due to Patient Access to Electronic Health Records: Protocol for a Scoping Review.患者获取电子健康记录导致的文档记录变化:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 28;12:e46722. doi: 10.2196/46722.
9
Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review.与受精神健康状况影响的人共享临床记录和电子健康记录:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 14;8(12):e34170. doi: 10.2196/34170.
10
Patients' Experiences of Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: National Patient Survey in Sweden.患者获取其电子健康记录的体验:瑞典全国患者调查
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 1;20(11):e278. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9492.

引用本文的文献

1
Relevant determinants of Dutch patients' informed decision-making and use of online access to medical records.荷兰患者知情决策及使用在线获取病历的相关决定因素。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jan 17;40(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae071.
2
Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records and Information Practices in Mental Health Care Contexts: Scoping Review.精神卫生保健背景下患者可访问的电子健康记录及信息实践:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 7;27:e54973. doi: 10.2196/54973.
3
Patient Experiences and Prerequisites of Collaboration as Partners in Person-Centred Care: An Interview Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the relevance and implementation of patient-centredness from the patients' perspective in Germany: results of a Delphi study.评估德国从患者角度出发的以患者为中心的相关性和实施情况:德尔菲研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e031741. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031741.
2
Health Professionals' Experience with Patients Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: Results from an Online Survey.医疗专业人员与患者获取其电子健康记录相关的经历:一项在线调查的结果
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:504-508. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190273.
3
Patients' Experiences of Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: National Patient Survey in Sweden.
以患者为中心的护理中作为合作伙伴的患者协作体验与前提条件:一项访谈研究
Nurs Open. 2025 Jan;12(1):e70133. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70133.
4
Patients' Use of Electronic Health Records Facilitates Patient-Centered Communication: Findings From the 2017 Health Information National Trends Survey.患者使用电子健康记录有助于以患者为中心的沟通:来自 2017 年健康信息国家趋势调查的发现。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 25;26:e50476. doi: 10.2196/50476.
5
Perception towards electronic health records & uptake of digital health IDs among the urban residents in northern India: A mixed methods study.印度北部城市居民对电子健康记录的认知及对数字健康 ID 的接受度:一项混合方法研究。
Indian J Med Res. 2024 Jul;160(1):51-60. doi: 10.25259/ijmr_664_23.
6
Toward Personalized Care and Patient Empowerment and Perspectives on a Personal Health Record in Hemophilia Care: Qualitative Interview Study.迈向血友病护理的个性化护理和患者赋权及个人健康记录的视角:定性访谈研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Sep 3;11:e48359. doi: 10.2196/48359.
7
Experiences from patients in mental healthcare accessing their electronic health records: results from a cross-national survey in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.精神卫生保健患者获取电子健康记录的体验:来自爱沙尼亚、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的跨国调查结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05916-8.
8
Development of Recommendations for the Digital Sharing of Notes With Adolescents in Mental Health Care: Delphi Study.开发针对心理健康护理中与青少年共享笔记的数字建议:德尔菲研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jun 6;11:e57965. doi: 10.2196/57965.
9
The Effect of Using a Client-Accessible Health Record on Perceived Quality of Care: Interview Study Among Parents and Adolescents.使用客户可访问的健康记录对感知医疗质量的影响:家长和青少年访谈研究
J Particip Med. 2024 Apr 23;16:e50092. doi: 10.2196/50092.
10
The Implementation of Federated Digital Identifiers in Health Care: Rapid Review.在医疗保健中实施联合数字标识符:快速审查。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Feb 8;26:e45751. doi: 10.2196/45751.
患者获取其电子健康记录的体验:瑞典全国患者调查
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 1;20(11):e278. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9492.
4
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
5
Improving healthcare through digital connection? Findings from a qualitative study about patient portals in New Zealand.通过数字连接改善医疗保健?新西兰一项关于患者门户网站的定性研究结果。
Aust J Prim Health. 2018 Nov;24(5):404-408. doi: 10.1071/PY17116.
6
Patient portal adoption and use by hospitalized cancer patients: a retrospective study of its impact on adverse events, utilization, and patient satisfaction.患者门户在住院癌症患者中的采用和使用:对不良事件、利用和患者满意度影响的回顾性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jul 27;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0644-4.
7
OpenNotes and shared decision making: a growing practice in clinical transparency and how it can support patient-centered care.开放病历和共同决策:临床透明度日益增长的实践以及它如何支持以患者为中心的护理。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1153-1159. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy083.
8
Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 2): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals.瑞典精神科护理中的开放病历(第2部分):精神科护理专业人员调查
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Jun 21;5(2):e10521. doi: 10.2196/10521.
9
Diabetes care providers' opinions and working methods after four years of experience with a diabetes patient web portal; a survey among health care providers in general practices and an outpatient clinic.糖尿病患者门户网站使用四年后糖尿病护理提供者的意见和工作方法;对普通诊所和门诊诊所医护人员的一项调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 21;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0781-y.
10
The user experiences and clinical outcomes of an online personal health record to support self-management of bipolar disorder: A pretest-posttest pilot study.用户在使用支持双相情感障碍自我管理的在线个人健康记录方面的体验和临床结果:一项预试验-后试验试点研究。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:261-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.069. Epub 2018 Jun 3.