• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发针对心理健康护理中与青少年共享笔记的数字建议:德尔菲研究。

Development of Recommendations for the Digital Sharing of Notes With Adolescents in Mental Health Care: Delphi Study.

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jun 6;11:e57965. doi: 10.2196/57965.

DOI:10.2196/57965
PMID:38860592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11185290/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In many countries, health care professionals are legally obliged to share information from electronic health records with patients. However, concerns have been raised regarding the sharing of notes with adolescents in mental health care, and health care professionals have called for recommendations to guide this practice.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to reach a consensus among authors of scientific papers on recommendations for health care professionals' digital sharing of notes with adolescents in mental health care and to investigate whether staff at child and adolescent specialist mental health care clinics agreed with the recommendations.

METHODS

A Delphi study was conducted with authors of scientific papers to reach a consensus on recommendations. The process of making the recommendations involved three steps. First, scientific papers meeting the eligibility criteria were identified through a PubMed search where the references were screened. Second, the results from the included papers were coded and transformed into recommendations in an iterative process. Third, the authors of the included papers were asked to provide feedback and consider their agreement with each of the suggested recommendations in two rounds. After the Delphi process, a cross-sectional study was conducted among staff at specialist child and adolescent mental health care clinics to assess whether they agreed with the recommendations that reached a consensus.

RESULTS

Of the 84 invited authors, 27 responded. A consensus was reached on 17 recommendations on areas related to digital sharing of notes with adolescents in mental health care. The recommendations considered how to introduce digital access to notes, write notes, and support health care professionals, and when to withhold notes. Of the 41 staff members at child and adolescent specialist mental health care clinics, 60% or more agreed with the 17 recommendations. No consensus was reached regarding the age at which adolescents should receive digital access to their notes and the timing of digitally sharing notes with parents.

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 17 recommendations related to key aspects of health care professionals' digital sharing of notes with adolescents in mental health care achieved consensus. Health care professionals can use these recommendations to guide their practice of sharing notes with adolescents in mental health care. However, the effects and experiences of following these recommendations should be tested in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

在许多国家,医疗保健专业人员有法律义务与患者共享电子健康记录中的信息。然而,人们对在精神卫生保健中与青少年共享笔记表示担忧,医疗保健专业人员呼吁提出指导这一做法的建议。

目的

旨在就医疗保健专业人员在精神卫生保健中与青少年共享电子笔记的建议达成科学论文作者之间的共识,并调查儿童和青少年精神科专家诊所的工作人员是否同意这些建议。

方法

对科学论文的作者进行了一项德尔菲研究,以就建议达成共识。制定建议的过程涉及三个步骤。首先,通过在 PubMed 中搜索,筛选参考文献,确定符合入选标准的科学论文。其次,对纳入论文的结果进行编码,并在迭代过程中转化为建议。最后,要求纳入论文的作者在两轮中提供反馈,并考虑他们对每个建议的同意程度。在德尔菲过程之后,对专家儿童和青少年精神卫生保健诊所的工作人员进行了横断面研究,以评估他们是否同意达成共识的建议。

结果

在 84 位受邀作者中,有 27 位做出了回应。就与精神卫生保健中与青少年共享电子笔记相关的 17 个建议达成了共识。这些建议考虑了如何引入访问笔记的数字渠道、撰写笔记以及支持医疗保健专业人员,以及何时保留笔记。在 41 名儿童和青少年精神科专家保健诊所的工作人员中,有 60%或更多的人同意这 17 项建议。在青少年应何时获得其笔记的数字访问权限以及何时与家长共享数字笔记方面,未达成共识。

结论

就医疗保健专业人员在精神卫生保健中与青少年共享电子笔记的关键方面达成了 17 项建议。医疗保健专业人员可以使用这些建议来指导他们在精神卫生保健中与青少年共享笔记的实践。但是,应在临床实践中检验这些建议的效果和经验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eebd/11185290/d00c5322511a/mental-v11-e57965-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eebd/11185290/184bd2a64f48/mental-v11-e57965-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eebd/11185290/d00c5322511a/mental-v11-e57965-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eebd/11185290/184bd2a64f48/mental-v11-e57965-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eebd/11185290/d00c5322511a/mental-v11-e57965-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of Recommendations for the Digital Sharing of Notes With Adolescents in Mental Health Care: Delphi Study.开发针对心理健康护理中与青少年共享笔记的数字建议:德尔菲研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Jun 6;11:e57965. doi: 10.2196/57965.
2
Sharing Clinical Notes and Electronic Health Records With People Affected by Mental Health Conditions: Scoping Review.与受精神健康状况影响的人共享临床记录和电子健康记录:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 14;8(12):e34170. doi: 10.2196/34170.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Patients' Experiences of Web-Based Access to Electronic Health Records in Finland: Cross-sectional Survey.芬兰患者对基于网络的电子健康记录访问的体验:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 6;24(6):e37438. doi: 10.2196/37438.
5
Mental Health Care Professionals' Appraisal of Patients' Use of Web-Based Access to Their Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Study.精神健康护理专业人员对患者使用其电子健康记录的网络访问的评估:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 27;23(8):e28045. doi: 10.2196/28045.
6
Users' perspectives of key factors to implementing electronic health records in Canada: a Delphi study.用户对加拿大实施电子健康记录的关键因素的看法:一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 11;12:105. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-105.
7
The benefits and harms of open notes in mental health: A Delphi survey of international experts.心理健康领域中公开病历的利弊:国际专家德尔菲调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 13;16(10):e0258056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258056. eCollection 2021.
8
Views, Use, and Experiences of Web-Based Access to Pediatric Electronic Health Records for Children, Adolescents, and Parents: Scoping Review.基于网络获取儿科电子健康记录供儿童、青少年及其家长使用的观点、使用情况和体验:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 22;24(11):e40328. doi: 10.2196/40328.
9
Ethical Development of Digital Phenotyping Tools for Mental Health Applications: Delphi Study.数字表型工具在精神健康应用中的伦理发展:德尔菲研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 28;9(7):e27343. doi: 10.2196/27343.
10
Developing mental health curricula and a service provision model for clinical associates in South Africa: a Delphi survey of family physicians and psychiatrists.为南非临床助理制定心理健康课程和服务提供模式:家庭医生和精神科医生的德尔菲调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jun 17;24(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05637-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Digital Media to Improve Adolescent Resilience and Prevent Mental Health Problems: Protocol for a Scoping Review.利用数字媒体提高青少年适应力和预防心理健康问题:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 16;13:e58681. doi: 10.2196/58681.

本文引用的文献

1
Adolescent Access to Clinicians' Notes: Adolescent, Parent, and Clinician Perspectives.青少年获取临床医生记录:青少年、家长和临床医生的观点。
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Jan;74(1):155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.08.008. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
2
Changes in Documentation Due to Patient Access to Electronic Health Records: Protocol for a Scoping Review.患者获取电子健康记录导致的文档记录变化:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 28;12:e46722. doi: 10.2196/46722.
3
Views on patient portal use for adolescents in mental health care - a qualitative study.
对精神卫生保健中青少年使用患者门户的看法——一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09156-6.
4
Views, Use, and Experiences of Web-Based Access to Pediatric Electronic Health Records for Children, Adolescents, and Parents: Scoping Review.基于网络获取儿科电子健康记录供儿童、青少年及其家长使用的观点、使用情况和体验:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 22;24(11):e40328. doi: 10.2196/40328.
5
Impact on patient-provider relationship and documentation practices when mental health patients access their electronic health records online: a qualitative study among health professionals in an outpatient setting.当心理健康患者在线访问其电子健康记录时,对医患关系和文件记录实践的影响:一项在门诊环境中针对卫生专业人员的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 28;22(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04123-7.
6
Developing good practice indicators to assist mental health practitioners to converse with young people about their online activities and impact on mental health: a two-panel mixed-methods Delphi study.制定良好实践指标,以帮助心理健康从业者与年轻人就其在线活动及其对心理健康的影响进行对话:一项双面板混合方法德尔菲研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04093-w.
7
Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: A methodological review.德尔菲技术在健康科学中的报告指南:方法学综述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Aug;172:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
Design of a Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Record System in Mental Health.精神卫生领域患者可访问的电子健康记录系统设计。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25;294:583-584. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220534.
9
Patients' Access to Their Psychiatric Records - A Comparison of Four Countries.患者获取精神科病历的情况——四个国家的比较。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25;294:510-514. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220511.
10
Minor and Parental Access to Electronic Health Records: Differences Across Four Countries.未成年人和父母获取电子健康记录:四个国家的差异。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 25;294:495-499. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220508.