Baral Ranju, Levin Ann, Odero Chris, Pecenka Clint, Tabu Collins, Mwendo Evans, Bonsu George, Bawa John, Dadzie John Frederick, Charo Joyce, Antwi-Agyei Kwadwo Odei, Amponsa-Achianou Kwame, Jalango Rose Eddah, Mkisi Rouden, Gordon Scott, Mzengeza Temwa, Morgan Winthrop, Muhib Farzana
Center for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, Washington DC, United States of America.
Levin and Morgan LLC, Levin, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):e0244995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244995. eCollection 2021.
The RTS,S/ASO1E malaria vaccine is being piloted in three countries-Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi-as part of a coordinated evaluation led by the World Health Organization, with support from global partners. This study estimates the costs of continuing malaria vaccination upon completion of the pilot evaluation to inform decision-making and planning around potential further use of the vaccine in pilot areas.
We used an activity-based costing approach to estimate the incremental costs of continuing to deliver four doses of RTS,S/ASO1E through the existing Expanded Program on Immunization platform, from each government's perspective. The RTS,S/ASO1E pilot introduction plans were reviewed and adapted to identify activities for costing. Key informant interviews with representatives from Ministries of Health (MOH) were conducted to inform the activities, resource requirements, and assumptions that, in turn, inform the analysis. Both financial and economic costs per dose, cost of delivery per dose, and cost per fully vaccinated child (FVC) are estimated and reported in 2017 USD units.
At a vaccine price of $5 per dose and assuming the vaccine is donor-funded, our estimated incremental financial costs range from $1.70 (Kenya) to $2.44 (Malawi) per dose, $0.23 (Malawi) to $0.71 (Kenya) per dose delivered (excluding procurement add-on costs), and $11.50 (Ghana) to $13.69 (Malawi) per FVC. Estimates of economic costs per dose are between three and five times higher than financial costs. Variations in activities used for costing, procurement add-on costs, unit costs of per diems, and allowances contributed to differences in cost estimates across countries.
Cost estimates in this analysis are meant to inform country decision-makers as they face the question of whether to continue malaria vaccination, should the intervention receive a positive recommendation for broader use. Additionally, important cost drivers for vaccine delivery are highlighted, some of which might be influenced by global and country-specific financing and existing procurement mechanisms. This analysis also adds to the evidence available on vaccine delivery costs for products delivered outside the standard immunization schedule.
作为由世界卫生组织牵头、全球合作伙伴提供支持的协调评估的一部分,RTS,S/ASO1E疟疾疫苗正在加纳、肯尼亚和马拉维三个国家进行试点。本研究估算了试点评估完成后继续进行疟疾疫苗接种的成本,以便为围绕该疫苗在试点地区可能的进一步使用进行决策和规划提供参考。
我们采用基于活动的成本核算方法,从每个政府的角度估算通过现有的扩大免疫规划平台继续提供四剂RTS,S/ASO1E的增量成本。对RTS,S/ASO1E试点引入计划进行了审查和调整,以确定成本核算活动。与卫生部代表进行了关键信息访谈,以了解相关活动、资源需求和假设,进而为分析提供信息。每剂的财务和经济成本、每剂的交付成本以及每个完全接种疫苗儿童(FVC)的成本均以2017年美元为单位进行估算和报告。
在每剂疫苗价格为5美元且假设疫苗由捐助方资助的情况下,我们估算的增量财务成本为每剂1.70美元(肯尼亚)至2.44美元(马拉维),每剂交付成本(不包括采购附加成本)为0.23美元(马拉维)至0.71美元(肯尼亚),每个FVC的成本为11.50美元(加纳)至13.69美元(马拉维)。每剂经济成本的估算比财务成本高出三到五倍。用于成本核算的活动、采购附加成本、每日津贴单位成本和补贴的差异导致各国成本估算存在差异。
本分析中的成本估算旨在为各国决策者提供信息,以便他们在该干预措施获得更广泛使用的积极建议时,面对是否继续进行疟疾疫苗接种的问题。此外,还突出了疫苗交付的重要成本驱动因素,其中一些可能受到全球和国家特定融资以及现有采购机制的影响。本分析还补充了关于在标准免疫规划时间表之外交付的产品的疫苗交付成本的现有证据。