Perry Erin B, Discepolo Dakota R, Liang Stephen Y, Jenkins Eileen K
Department of Animal Science Food & Nutrition, Southern Illinois University, 1205 Lincoln Drive, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine and Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 8;11(1):120. doi: 10.3390/ani11010120.
Evidence-based canine decontamination protocols are underrepresented in the veterinary literature. Aerosolized microbiological and chemical contaminants can pose a risk in deployment environments highlighting the need for improved canine field decontamination strategies. Prior work has established the efficacy of traditional, water-intensive methods on contaminant removal from the coat of the working canine; however, it is not known if similar reductions can be achieved with simple field expedient methods when resources are limited. The objective of this study was to measure the reduction of aerosolized contamination via a practical "wipe-down" procedure performed on working canine coats contaminated with a fluorescent, non-toxic, water-based aerosol. Disposable, lint-free towels were saturated with one of three treatments: water, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate scrub (CHX), or 7.5% povidone-iodine scrub (PVD). Both CHX and PVD were diluted at a 1:4 ratio. Treatments were randomly assigned to one of three quadrants established across the shoulders and back of commonly utilized working dog breeds (Labrador retrievers, n = 16; German shepherds, n = 16). The fourth quadrant remained unwiped, thus serving as a control. Reduction in fluorescent marker contamination was measured and compared across all quadrants. PVD demonstrated greater marker reduction compared to CHX or water in both breeds ( < 0.0001). Reduction was similar between CHX or water in Labradors ( = 0.86) and shepherds ( = 0.06). Effective wipe-down strategies using common veterinary cleansers should be further investigated and incorporated into decontamination practices to safeguard working canine health and prevent cross-contamination of human personnel working with these animals.
循证犬类去污方案在兽医文献中的介绍较少。雾化的微生物和化学污染物会在部署环境中构成风险,这凸显了改进犬类野外去污策略的必要性。先前的研究已经证实了传统的、耗水量大的方法在去除工作犬毛发上的污染物方面的有效性;然而,在资源有限的情况下,采用简单的野外应急方法是否能实现类似程度的去污效果尚不清楚。本研究的目的是通过对被荧光、无毒、水基气雾剂污染的工作犬毛发进行实际的“擦拭”程序,来测量雾化污染的减少情况。一次性无绒毛巾用三种处理方法之一浸湿:水、2%葡萄糖酸洗必泰擦洗剂(CHX)或7.5%聚维酮碘擦洗剂(PVD)。CHX和PVD均按1:4的比例稀释。将处理方法随机分配到常用工作犬品种(拉布拉多寻回犬,n = 16;德国牧羊犬,n = 16)肩部和背部划分的三个象限之一。第四象限不进行擦拭,作为对照。测量并比较所有象限中荧光标记物污染的减少情况。在两个品种中,PVD显示出比CHX或水更大的标记物减少效果(<0.0001)。拉布拉多犬(= 0.86)和牧羊犬(= 0.06)中,CHX或水之间的减少效果相似。应进一步研究并将使用常见兽医清洁剂的有效擦拭策略纳入去污实践中,以保障工作犬的健康,并防止与这些动物一起工作的人员发生交叉污染。