Suppr超能文献

非对比 CT 卒中梗死体积与 RAPID CT 灌注在估计再灌注后梗死体积方面相似。

Noncontrast Computed Tomography e-Stroke Infarct Volume Is Similar to RAPID Computed Tomography Perfusion in Estimating Postreperfusion Infarct Volumes.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Marcus Stroke and Neuroscience Center, Grady Memorial Hospital, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (M.B., K.R., G.M.R., L.P., D.C.H., M.R.F., R.G.N.).

Acute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (G.H.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(2):634-641. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031651. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The e-Stroke Suite software (Brainomix, Oxford, United Kingdom) is a tool designed for the automated quantification of The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score and ischemic core volumes on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT). We sought to compare the prediction of postreperfusion infarct volumes and the clinical outcomes across NCCT e-Stroke software versus RAPID (IschemaView, Menlo Park, CA) computed tomography perfusion measurements.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke presenting at a tertiary care center between September 2010 and November 2018 who had available baseline infarct volumes on both NCCT e-Stroke Suite software and RAPID CTP as well as final infarct volume (FIV) measurements and achieved complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale 2c-3) post-thrombectomy were included. The associations between estimated baseline ischemic core volumes and FIV as well as 90-day functional outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventy-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 64 years (55-75), median e-Stroke and computed tomography perfusion ischemic core volumes were 38.4 (21.8-58) and 5 (0-17.7) mL, respectively, whereas median FIV was 22.2 (9.1-56.2) mL. The correlation between e-Stroke and CTP ischemic core volumes was moderate (R=0.44; <0.001). Similarly, moderate correlations were observed between e-Stroke software ischemic core and FIV (R=0.52; <0.001) and CTP core and FIV (R=0.43; <0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that e-Stroke software and CTP performance was similar in the early and late (>6 hours) treatment windows. Multivariate analysis showed that both e-Stroke software NCCT baseline ischemic core volume (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]) and RAPID CTP ischemic core volume (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.97-0.99]) were independently and comparably associated with good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

NCCT e-Stroke Suite software performed similarly to RAPID CTP in assessing postreperfusion FIV and functional outcomes for both early- and late-presenting patients. NCCT e-Stroke volumes seems to represent a viable alternative in centers where access to advanced imaging is limited. Moreover, the future development of fusion maps of NCCT and CTP ischemic core estimates may improve upon the current performance of these tools as applied in isolation.

摘要

背景与目的

e-Stroke 套件软件(Brainomix,英国牛津)是一款用于自动量化非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT)上的阿尔伯塔卒中计划早期 CT 评分和缺血核心体积的工具。我们旨在比较 NCCT e-Stroke 软件与 RAPID(IchemaView,加利福尼亚州门洛帕克)计算机断层灌注测量在预测再灌注后梗死体积和临床结局方面的性能。

方法

所有连续的前循环大血管闭塞性卒中患者,在 2010 年 9 月至 2018 年 11 月期间在三级护理中心就诊,在 NCCT e-Stroke 套件软件和 RAPID CTP 上均有基线梗死体积,并且最终梗死体积(FIV)测量值和完全再灌注(改良脑梗死溶栓治疗量表 2c-3)后都可获得。评估了估计的基线缺血核心体积与 FIV 以及 90 天功能结局之间的相关性。

结果

479 名患者符合纳入标准。中位年龄为 64 岁(55-75),e-Stroke 和 CT 灌注缺血核心体积中位数分别为 38.4(21.8-58)和 5(0-17.7)mL,而 FIV 中位数为 22.2(9.1-56.2)mL。e-Stroke 和 CTP 缺血核心体积之间的相关性为中度(R=0.44;<0.001)。同样,e-Stroke 软件缺血核心与 FIV(R=0.52;<0.001)和 CTP 核心与 FIV(R=0.43;<0.001)之间也观察到中度相关性。亚组分析显示,e-Stroke 软件和 CTP 在早期(<6 小时)和晚期(>6 小时)治疗窗口中的表现相似。多变量分析表明,NCCT e-Stroke 套件软件的基线缺血核心体积(调整后的优势比,0.98[95%置信区间,0.97-0.99])和 RAPID CTP 缺血核心体积(调整后的优势比,0.98[95%置信区间,0.97-0.99])均与 90 天时的良好结局(改良 Rankin 量表评分为 0-2)独立且相当相关。

结论

NCCT e-Stroke 套件软件在评估再灌注后 FIV 和早期及晚期患者的功能结局方面与 RAPID CTP 表现相似。NCCT e-Stroke 体积似乎是在获取高级影像学检查受限的中心的可行替代方案。此外,NCCT 和 CTP 缺血核心估计融合图的未来发展可能会提高这些工具在单独应用时的性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验