• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The effect of sertraline on emotional processing: secondary analyses of the PANDA randomised controlled trial.舍曲林对情绪处理的影响:PANDA 随机对照试验的二次分析。
Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(13):2814-2821. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720004985. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
A randomised controlled trial assessing the severity and duration of depressive symptoms associated with a clinically significant response to sertraline versus placebo, in people presenting to primary care with depression (PANDA trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项随机对照试验,评估在因抑郁症就诊于初级保健机构的人群中,与舍曲林相比安慰剂产生临床显著反应时所伴随的抑郁症状的严重程度和持续时间(PANDA试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 24;18(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2253-4.
3
4
The clinical effectiveness of sertraline in primary care and the role of depression severity and duration (PANDA): a pragmatic, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial.舍曲林在初级保健中的临床疗效以及抑郁严重程度和病程的作用(PANDA):一项实用、双盲、安慰剂对照随机试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;6(11):903-914. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30366-9. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
5
Study of the use of antidepressants for depression in dementia: the HTA-SADD trial--a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of sertraline and mirtazapine.痴呆患者使用抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症的研究:HTA-SADD 试验——一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,旨在评估舍曲林和米氮平的临床疗效和成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Feb;17(7):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta17070.
6
Antidepressant medication to prevent depression relapse in primary care: the ANTLER RCT.在初级保健中使用抗抑郁药物预防抑郁症复发:ANTLER RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Nov;25(69):1-62. doi: 10.3310/hta25690.
7
Combining mirtazapine with SSRIs or SNRIs for treatment-resistant depression: the MIR RCT.联合米氮平与 SSRIs 或 SNRIs 治疗难治性抑郁症:MIR RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(63):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta22630.
8
New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.新一代抗抑郁药治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;5(5):CD013674. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013674.pub2.
9
A randomised controlled trial assessing the use of citalopram, sertraline, fluoxetine and mirtazapine in preventing relapse in primary care patients who are taking long-term maintenance antidepressants (ANTLER: ANTidepressants to prevent reLapse in dEpRession): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估西酞普兰、舍曲林、氟西汀和米氮平在长期服用维持性抗抑郁药的初级保健患者中预防复发的随机对照试验(ANTLER:预防抑郁症复发的抗抑郁药):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Jun 3;20(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3390-8.
10
[Use of antidepressant drugs in schizophrenic patients with depression].抗抑郁药物在伴有抑郁症状的精神分裂症患者中的应用
Encephale. 2006 Mar-Apr;32(2 Pt 1):263-9. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76153-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Into the Treatment of Adolescent Depression: A Retrospective Study.将辩证行为疗法纳入青少年抑郁症治疗:一项回顾性研究。
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2025 Aug;53(4):701-714. doi: 10.62641/aep.v53i4.1963.
2
Neuropsychological markers of antidepressant action: a secondary analysis of the ANTLER randomised controlled trial.抗抑郁作用的神经心理学标志物:ANTLER随机对照试验的二次分析
Psychol Med. 2023 Oct;53(14):6592-6599. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722003981. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
3
The attention-emotion interaction in healthy female participants on oral contraceptives during 1-week escitalopram intake.健康女性参与者在服用艾司西酞普兰1周期间口服避孕药时的注意力-情绪相互作用。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Sep 9;16:809269. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.809269. eCollection 2022.
4
Relationship between change in social evaluation learning and mood in early antidepressant treatment: A prospective cohort study in primary care.社会评价学习变化与早期抗抑郁治疗中情绪的关系:初级保健中的前瞻性队列研究。
J Psychopharmacol. 2023 Mar;37(3):303-312. doi: 10.1177/02698811221116928. Epub 2022 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical effectiveness of sertraline in primary care and the role of depression severity and duration (PANDA): a pragmatic, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial.舍曲林在初级保健中的临床疗效以及抑郁严重程度和病程的作用(PANDA):一项实用、双盲、安慰剂对照随机试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Nov;6(11):903-914. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30366-9. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
2
Cognitive neuropsychological theory: Reconciliation of psychological and biological approaches for depression.认知神经心理学理论:抑郁症心理和生物学方法的调和。
Pharmacol Ther. 2019 May;197:38-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
3
Predicting treatment response to antidepressant medication using early changes in emotional processing.使用情绪处理的早期变化预测抗抑郁药物治疗反应。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019 Jan;29(1):66-75. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.11.1102. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
4
A Dissociation of the Acute Effects of Bupropion on Positive Emotional Processing and Reward Processing in Healthy Volunteers.安非他酮对健康志愿者积极情绪加工和奖赏加工的急性效应的分离
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 16;9:482. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00482. eCollection 2018.
5
Short-term escitalopram treatment normalizes aberrant self-referential processing in major depressive disorder.短期依地普仑治疗可使重度抑郁症患者异常的自我参照加工正常化。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Aug 15;236:222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.096. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
6
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.21 种抗抑郁药治疗成人重度抑郁症的急性治疗的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 7;391(10128):1357-1366. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
7
A randomised controlled trial assessing the severity and duration of depressive symptoms associated with a clinically significant response to sertraline versus placebo, in people presenting to primary care with depression (PANDA trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项随机对照试验,评估在因抑郁症就诊于初级保健机构的人群中,与舍曲林相比安慰剂产生临床显著反应时所伴随的抑郁症状的严重程度和持续时间(PANDA试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 24;18(1):496. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2253-4.
8
Variation in the recall of socially rewarding information and depressive symptom severity: a prospective cohort study.社交奖励信息回忆与抑郁症状严重程度的差异:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 May;135(5):489-498. doi: 10.1111/acps.12729. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
How do antidepressants work? New perspectives for refining future treatment approaches.抗抑郁药是如何起作用的?完善未来治疗方法的新视角。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 May;4(5):409-418. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30015-9. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
A single dose of mirtazapine attenuates neural responses to self-referential processing.单次服用米氮平可减弱对自我参照加工的神经反应。
J Psychopharmacol. 2016 Jan;30(1):23-32. doi: 10.1177/0269881115616384. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

舍曲林对情绪处理的影响:PANDA 随机对照试验的二次分析。

The effect of sertraline on emotional processing: secondary analyses of the PANDA randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Faculty of Brain Sciences, London, UK.

Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(13):2814-2821. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720004985. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1017/S0033291720004985
PMID:33431087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9647512/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to the cognitive neuropsychological model, antidepressants reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety by increasing positive relative to negative information processing. Most studies of whether antidepressants alter emotional processing use small samples of healthy individuals, which lead to low statistical power and selection bias and are difficult to generalise to clinical practice. We tested whether the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline altered recall of positive and negative information in a large randomised controlled trial (RCT) of patients with depressive symptoms recruited from primary care.

METHODS

The PANDA trial was a pragmatic multicentre double-blind RCT comparing sertraline with placebo. Memory for personality descriptors was tested at baseline and 2 and 6 weeks after randomisation using a computerised emotional categorisation task followed by a free recall. We measured the number of positive and negative words correctly recalled (hits). Poisson mixed models were used to analyse longitudinal associations between treatment allocation and hits.

RESULTS

A total of 576 participants (88% of those randomised) completed the recall task at 2 and 6 weeks. We found no evidence that positive or negative hits differed according to treatment allocation at 2 or 6 weeks (adjusted positive hits ratio = 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.05, = 0.52; adjusted negative hits ratio = 0.99, 95% CI 0.90-1.08, = 0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest individual placebo-controlled trial of an antidepressant not funded by the pharmaceutical industry, we found no evidence that sertraline altered positive or negative recall early in treatment. These findings challenge some assumptions of the cognitive neuropsychological model of antidepressant action.

摘要

背景

根据认知神经心理学模型,抗抑郁药通过增加积极信息相对于消极信息的处理来减轻抑郁和焦虑症状。大多数关于抗抑郁药是否改变情绪处理的研究都使用了来自初级保健的健康个体的小样本,这导致了低统计效力和选择偏差,并且难以推广到临床实践。我们测试了选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)舍曲林是否在一项针对抑郁症状患者的大型随机对照试验(RCT)中改变了积极和消极信息的回忆,该试验是从初级保健中招募的。

方法

PANDA 试验是一项实用的多中心双盲 RCT,比较了舍曲林与安慰剂。使用计算机化情绪分类任务和自由回忆测试,在基线和随机分组后 2 周和 6 周测试人格描述符的记忆。我们测量了正确回忆的积极和消极单词数量(命中数)。使用泊松混合模型分析治疗分配与命中数之间的纵向关联。

结果

共有 576 名参与者(88%随机分配)在 2 周和 6 周时完成了回忆任务。我们没有发现治疗分配在 2 周或 6 周时对积极或消极命中数有任何影响(调整后的积极命中比=0.97,95%CI 0.90-1.05, =0.52;调整后的消极命中比=0.99,95%CI 0.90-1.08, =0.76)。

结论

在最大的一项由制药行业资助的抗抑郁药个体安慰剂对照试验中,我们没有发现舍曲林在早期治疗中改变积极或消极回忆的证据。这些发现挑战了抗抑郁药作用的认知神经心理学模型的一些假设。