Tamura Jun, Oyama Norihiko, Fukui Sho, Yamashita Kazuto
Departments of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido 069-8501, Japan.
Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-0018, Japan.
J Vet Med Sci. 2021 Jan 14;83(1):73-77. doi: 10.1292/jvms.20-0407. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
To compare the anesthetic effects after intravenous administration of alfaxalone or propofol without premedication, either alfaxalone (5 mg/kg) or propofol (10 mg/kg) was administered intravenously over 120 sec in 6 cats. Each cat received the alternate treatment at least a 7-day interval. Anesthetic effects (tolerance of intubation, behavior changes and neurodepressive score) and physiological parameters were evaluated. Both treatments produced a rapid loss of consciousness, no apnea, and physiological parameters were maintained within clinically acceptable ranges apart from transient hypoxemia. The degree of hypoxemia was greater after the propofol treatment compared with the alfaxalone treatment. During the recovery period, more adverse events (ataxia, muscular tremors) were observed after the alfaxalone treatment compared with the propofol treatment.
为比较在未进行术前用药的情况下静脉注射阿法沙龙或丙泊酚后的麻醉效果,对6只猫在120秒内静脉注射阿法沙龙(5毫克/千克)或丙泊酚(10毫克/千克)。每只猫至少间隔7天接受交替治疗。评估麻醉效果(插管耐受性、行为变化和神经抑制评分)和生理参数。两种治疗均导致快速意识丧失,无呼吸暂停,除短暂低氧血症外,生理参数维持在临床可接受范围内。与阿法沙龙治疗相比,丙泊酚治疗后的低氧血症程度更严重。在恢复期,与丙泊酚治疗相比,阿法沙龙治疗后观察到更多不良事件(共济失调、肌肉震颤)。