Suppr超能文献

鼻内给予右美托咪定联合吗啡或曲马多:对猫麻醉所需阿法沙龙影响的比较研究

Intranasal dexmedetomidine with morphine or tramadol: A comparative study of effects on alfaxalone requirements for anesthesia in cats.

作者信息

Hommuang Kewvaree, Koatsang Nattika, Srikullabutr Suttiporn, Sattasathuchana Panpicha, Thengchaisri Naris

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Mahidol University, Salaya, Phutthamonthon District, Nakhon Pathom, 73170, Thailand.

Surgery Unit, Kasetsart University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand.

出版信息

Vet World. 2023 Jun;16(6):1201-1208. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.1201-1208. Epub 2023 Jun 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Intranasal (IN) sedatives provide a non-invasive route for premedication drug administration. This study compared the cardiorespiratory and sparing effects of IN dexmedetomidine combined with morphine (DM) or tramadol (DT) on alfaxalone requirements for anesthesia induction in cats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four cats were randomly assigned to three groups: Dexmedetomidine combined morphine (IN dexmedetomidine 20 μg/kg plus 0.2 mg/kg morphine), DT (IN dexmedetomidine 20 μg/kg plus 1 mg/kg tramadol), or control (no premedication). The intravenous dose of 1% alfaxalone for endotracheal intubation was recorded with sedation scores, cardiorespiratory parameters (heart rate and respiration rate), and side effects.

RESULTS

Both DM and DT were associated with significantly higher sedation scores than baseline, and sedation scores were found to be highest 20 min after premedication. Sedation scores were comparable between DM and DT groups. Side effects, including hypersalivation, vomiting, and pupillary dilation, were observed in the DM and DT groups. The dosage of alfaxalone required in the DM group (1.5 ± 0.3 mg/kg) was comparable to that of the DT group (2.0 ± 0.6 mg/kg, p = 0.0861), and both groups required significantly less alfaxalone than the control group (3.0 ± 0.6 mg/kg; p < 0.01). Heart and respiratory rates were comparable between the DM and DT groups. Duration of anesthesia in the control group (11 ± 4 min) was significantly shorter than in the DM (29 ± 5 min, p = 0.0016) and DT (38 ± 14 min, p < 0.001) groups.

CONCLUSION

Intranasal administration of DM or DT produces good sedation and offers an alternative, non-invasive route for cats undergoing general anesthesia.

摘要

背景与目的

鼻内(IN)镇静剂为术前用药提供了一种非侵入性给药途径。本研究比较了鼻内右美托咪定联合吗啡(DM)或曲马多(DT)对猫麻醉诱导时阿法沙龙需求量的心肺及节省效应。

材料与方法

24只猫随机分为三组:右美托咪定联合吗啡组(鼻内右美托咪定20μg/kg加0.2mg/kg吗啡)、DT组(鼻内右美托咪定20μg/kg加1mg/kg曲马多)或对照组(未进行术前用药)。记录气管插管时1%阿法沙龙的静脉给药剂量,同时记录镇静评分、心肺参数(心率和呼吸频率)及副作用。

结果

DM组和DT组的镇静评分均显著高于基线水平,且在术前用药后20分钟时镇静评分最高。DM组和DT组的镇静评分相当。DM组和DT组均观察到包括流涎过多、呕吐和瞳孔散大在内的副作用。DM组所需阿法沙龙剂量(1.5±0.3mg/kg)与DT组(2.0±0.6mg/kg,p = 0.0861)相当,且两组所需阿法沙龙均显著少于对照组(3.0±0.6mg/kg;p < 0.01)。DM组和DT组的心率和呼吸频率相当。对照组的麻醉持续时间(11±4分钟)显著短于DM组(29±5分钟, p = 0.0016)和DT组(38±14分钟, p < 0.001)。

结论

鼻内给予DM或DT可产生良好的镇静效果,为接受全身麻醉的猫提供了一种替代的非侵入性给药途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a851/10421539/655765bb2d1a/Vetworld-16-1201-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验