• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与途径:促进男性参与暴力干预项目的因素的探索性定性分析。

Pathways to Engagement: An Exploratory Qualitative Analysis of Factors That Facilitate Men's Engagement in IPV Intervention Programs.

机构信息

Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2021 Nov;27(14):2642-2663. doi: 10.1177/1077801220981144. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1177/1077801220981144
PMID:33432859
Abstract

Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) interventions has long indicated mixed support for their effectiveness at reducing abusive behaviors. Limited prior research has focused on factors associated with participant engagement in the treatment process. Using a qualitative thematic analysis and a sample of 180 participants who completed an IPV intervention program, the purpose of this study was to identify key factors that facilitate men's responsiveness to IPV intervention programs. The findings highlight several commonalities in participants' perceptions of pathways that facilitated and/or hindered their engagement in the treatment process, and provide insights into how program/process elements can be structured to enhance engagement.

摘要

关于亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)干预措施的研究长期以来一直表明,它们在减少虐待行为方面的有效性存在混合支持。先前的研究有限,主要集中在与参与者参与治疗过程相关的因素上。本研究采用定性主题分析和 180 名完成 IPV 干预计划的参与者样本,旨在确定促进男性对 IPV 干预计划做出反应的关键因素。研究结果突出了参与者对促进和/或阻碍他们参与治疗过程的途径的看法的一些共同点,并提供了有关如何构建计划/流程要素以提高参与度的见解。

相似文献

1
Pathways to Engagement: An Exploratory Qualitative Analysis of Factors That Facilitate Men's Engagement in IPV Intervention Programs.参与途径:促进男性参与暴力干预项目的因素的探索性定性分析。
Violence Against Women. 2021 Nov;27(14):2642-2663. doi: 10.1177/1077801220981144. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
Ecological pathways to prevention: How does the SASA! community mobilisation model work to prevent physical intimate partner violence against women?预防的生态途径:“SASA!”社区动员模式如何预防针对妇女的亲密伴侣身体暴力?
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 16;16:339. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3018-9.
3
"Help Me Realize What I'm Becoming": Men's Views on Digital Interventions as a Way to Promote Early Help-Seeking for Use of Violence in Relationships.“帮助我认识到自己的变化”:男性对数字干预作为促进早期寻求帮助以解决人际关系中暴力问题的看法。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jul;38(13-14):8016-8041. doi: 10.1177/08862605231153885. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
4
Effectiveness of a multi-level intervention to reduce men's perpetration of intimate partner violence: a cluster randomised controlled trial.多层面干预降低男性亲密伴侣暴力行为的效果:一项群组随机对照试验。
Trials. 2020 Apr 25;21(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4185-7.
5
Process evaluation of a community mobilization intervention for preventing men's partner violence use in peri-urban South Africa.南非城郊地区预防男性对伴侣使用暴力的社区动员干预措施的过程评估
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Feb;78:101727. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101727. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
6
The Men's Group at St. Pius V: A Case Study of a Parish-Based Voluntary Partner Abuse Intervention Program.圣皮乌斯五世教区的男性团体:一个基于教区的自愿性伴侣虐待干预项目的案例研究
Am J Mens Health. 2020 Jan-Feb;14(1):1557988319891287. doi: 10.1177/1557988319891287.
7
Effectiveness of a culturally appropriate intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV transmission among men, women, and couples in rural Ethiopia: Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.文化适宜型干预在埃塞俄比亚农村地区预防男性、女性和夫妻间亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒传播的效果:一项基于群组随机对照试验的研究结果。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 18;17(8):e1003274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003274. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Pathways to Seeking Help From a Partner Abuse Intervention Program: A Qualitative Study of Voluntary and Non-Court-Mandated Latino Men's Experiences.寻求伴侣虐待干预计划帮助的途径:一项关于自愿和非法庭强制的拉丁裔男性经历的定性研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Nov;36(21-22):10454-10478. doi: 10.1177/0886260519884680. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
9
"How Many Silences Are There?" Men's Experience of Victimization in Intimate Partner Relationships.“有多少沉默?”男性在亲密伴侣关系中的受害经历。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(23-24):5390-5413. doi: 10.1177/0886260517719905. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
10
Improved Relationship Quality, Equitable Gender Attitudes, and Reduced Alcohol Abuse as Key Mechanisms to Reduce Intimate Partner Violence in the Bandebereho Couples' Randomized Trial in Rwanda.改善关系质量、平等的性别态度以及减少酗酒是减少卢旺达班德贝莱霍夫妇随机试验中亲密伴侣暴力的关键机制。
Prev Sci. 2022 Nov;23(8):1495-1506. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01445-6. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Experienced Versus Perpetrated Intimate Partner Violence and Psychological Maladjustment: The Role of Adaptive and Avoidant Coping.经历的与实施的亲密伴侣暴力及心理调适:适应性与回避性应对的作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 30;22(1):36. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010036.
2
Engaging Mozambican men in a couple-based therapy to reduce intimate partner violence and improve mental health: Community stakeholders' perspectives.让莫桑比克男性参与夫妻治疗以减少亲密伴侣暴力并改善心理健康:社区利益相关者的观点。
SSM Ment Health. 2024 Jun;5. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100297. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
3
Reflections on the group dynamic in a group cognitive behavioral therapy intervention for young adult women with moderate to severe dysmenorrhea: a qualitative analysis.
对一项针对中重度痛经的年轻成年女性群体认知行为疗法干预中群体动力的反思:一项定性分析。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Dec;44(1):2264486. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2023.2264486. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
4
Challenges to an Individualized Approach Toward Batterers Intervention Programs in the Context of Coordinated Community Response to the Intimate Partner Violence in Lithuania.立陶宛在对亲密伴侣暴力采取社区协调应对措施的背景下,针对施暴者干预项目的个性化方法所面临的挑战。
J Fam Violence. 2022 Nov 17:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10896-022-00467-6.
5
Suspension of Criminal Proceedings for Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Impact on Re-Entries.对亲密伴侣暴力侵害妇女行为实施者刑事诉讼的中止:对再次犯罪的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 29;12:725081. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725081. eCollection 2021.