• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“帮助我认识到自己的变化”:男性对数字干预作为促进早期寻求帮助以解决人际关系中暴力问题的看法。

"Help Me Realize What I'm Becoming": Men's Views on Digital Interventions as a Way to Promote Early Help-Seeking for Use of Violence in Relationships.

机构信息

The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jul;38(13-14):8016-8041. doi: 10.1177/08862605231153885. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1177/08862605231153885
PMID:36762522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10326356/
Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major global issue with huge impacts on individuals, families, and communities. It is also a gendered problem, with the vast majority of IPV perpetrated by men. To date, interventions have primarily focused on victim/survivors; however, it is increasingly recognized that men's use of violence must also be addressed. Despite this, there remain limited options for doing this in practice. In most high-income countries, men's behavior change programs (MBCPs) or their equivalent are the typical referral pathway, with men often mandated to attend by the criminal justice system. Yet, these programs have limited evidence for their effectiveness and recidivism and dropouts are major challenges. Moreover, an entire subset of men-those uninvolved with criminal justice settings-remain under-serviced. It is clear that a critical gap remains around early engagement with men using violence in relationships. This study explores the potential for digital interventions (websites or apps) to fill this gap through qualitative analysis of data from focus groups with 21 men attending MBCPs in Victoria, Australia. Overall, we interpreted men's perceptions of digital interventions as being able to facilitate connection with the "better man inside," with four sub-themes: (a) Don't jump down my throat straight away; (b) Help me realize what I'm becoming; (c) Seeing a change in my future; and (d) Make it simple and accessible. The findings of this study suggest that there is strong potential for digital interventions to engage early with men using IPV, but also some key challenges. Websites or apps can provide a safe, private space for men to reflect on their behavior and its consequences; however, the lack of interpersonal interaction can make it challenging to balance non-judgmental engagement with accountability. These issues should be considered when designing digital interventions for men using violence in relationships.

摘要

亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个全球性的重大问题,对个人、家庭和社区都有巨大影响。它也是一个性别问题,绝大多数 IPV 都是由男性实施的。迄今为止,干预措施主要集中在受害者/幸存者身上;然而,人们越来越认识到,也必须解决男性使用暴力的问题。尽管如此,在实践中仍然很少有选择来解决这个问题。在大多数高收入国家,男性行为改变计划(MBCP)或其等效计划是典型的转介途径,男性通常被刑事司法系统强制要求参加。然而,这些计划在有效性和累犯方面的证据有限,辍学率是主要挑战。此外,还有一部分男性——那些与刑事司法环境无关的男性——仍然得不到服务。显然,在早期与有暴力行为的男性接触方面仍然存在一个关键的差距。本研究通过对 21 名参加澳大利亚维多利亚州 MBCP 的男性进行焦点小组的定性分析,探讨了数字干预措施(网站或应用程序)填补这一空白的潜力。总的来说,我们将男性对数字干预措施的看法解释为能够促进与“内心更好的自己”的联系,有四个子主题:(a)不要马上对我大喊大叫;(b)帮助我认识到我正在成为什么样的人;(c)看到我未来的变化;(d)使其简单易懂。这项研究的结果表明,数字干预措施有很大的潜力可以早期接触到使用 IPV 的男性,但也存在一些关键挑战。网站或应用程序可以为男性提供一个安全、私人的空间,让他们反思自己的行为及其后果;然而,缺乏人际互动可能会使非评判性的参与与问责制之间的平衡变得具有挑战性。在为使用暴力的男性设计数字干预措施时,应该考虑这些问题。

相似文献

1
"Help Me Realize What I'm Becoming": Men's Views on Digital Interventions as a Way to Promote Early Help-Seeking for Use of Violence in Relationships.“帮助我认识到自己的变化”:男性对数字干预作为促进早期寻求帮助以解决人际关系中暴力问题的看法。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jul;38(13-14):8016-8041. doi: 10.1177/08862605231153885. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
2
"A Lightbulb Moment": Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Explore the Challenges and Opportunities for Early Engagement of Australian Men Who Use Violence in Their Relationships.“顿悟时刻”:利用计划行为理论探索澳大利亚男性在人际关系中使用暴力的早期参与所面临的挑战和机遇。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Apr;36(7-8):NP3889-NP3913. doi: 10.1177/0886260518780778. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
3
"How Many Silences Are There?" Men's Experience of Victimization in Intimate Partner Relationships.“有多少沉默?”男性在亲密伴侣关系中的受害经历。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(23-24):5390-5413. doi: 10.1177/0886260517719905. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
4
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a healthy relationship tool for men who use intimate partner violence (BETTER MAN).使用亲密伴侣暴力的男性健康关系工具(BETTER MAN)的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 2;23(1):2395. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17032-5.
5
Pathways to Engagement: An Exploratory Qualitative Analysis of Factors That Facilitate Men's Engagement in IPV Intervention Programs.参与途径:促进男性参与暴力干预项目的因素的探索性定性分析。
Violence Against Women. 2021 Nov;27(14):2642-2663. doi: 10.1177/1077801220981144. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
A Brief Online Motivational Tool to Promote Early Help-Seeking in Men Using Abuse and Violence in Relationships: A Feasibility Trial.一种用于促进使用虐待和暴力的男性关系中早期寻求帮助的简短在线激励工具:可行性试验。
Violence Vict. 2024 Aug 6;39(3):243-262. doi: 10.1891/VV-2022-0159.
7
Black Men's Intimate Partner Violence Victimization, Help-Seeking, and Barriers to Help-Seeking.黑人男性亲密伴侣暴力受害、寻求帮助及寻求帮助障碍。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Aug;38(15-16):8849-8877. doi: 10.1177/08862605231159632. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
8
Effectiveness of a multi-level intervention to reduce men's perpetration of intimate partner violence: a cluster randomised controlled trial.多层面干预降低男性亲密伴侣暴力行为的效果:一项群组随机对照试验。
Trials. 2020 Apr 25;21(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4185-7.
9
Ecological pathways to prevention: How does the SASA! community mobilisation model work to prevent physical intimate partner violence against women?预防的生态途径:“SASA!”社区动员模式如何预防针对妇女的亲密伴侣身体暴力?
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 16;16:339. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3018-9.
10
The Men's Group at St. Pius V: A Case Study of a Parish-Based Voluntary Partner Abuse Intervention Program.圣皮乌斯五世教区的男性团体:一个基于教区的自愿性伴侣虐待干预项目的案例研究
Am J Mens Health. 2020 Jan-Feb;14(1):1557988319891287. doi: 10.1177/1557988319891287.

引用本文的文献

1
Breaking the cycle: addressing barriers to help-seeking and mental health impacts for male victims of intimate partner violence in low-and middle-income countries.打破循环:解决低收入和中等收入国家亲密伴侣暴力男性受害者寻求帮助的障碍及其对心理健康的影响
Front Public Health. 2025 May 6;13:1565284. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1565284. eCollection 2025.
2
Engaging Mozambican men in a couple-based therapy to reduce intimate partner violence and improve mental health: Community stakeholders' perspectives.让莫桑比克男性参与夫妻治疗以减少亲密伴侣暴力并改善心理健康:社区利益相关者的观点。
SSM Ment Health. 2024 Jun;5. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100297. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
3
Reproductive coercion and abuse in intimate relationships: Women's perceptions of perpetrator motivations.亲密关系中的生殖强迫和虐待:女性对施害者动机的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0299069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299069. eCollection 2024.
4
Adapting the ADVANCE group program for digitally-supported delivery to reduce intimate partner violence by men in substance use treatment: a feasibility study.改编ADVANCE小组项目以进行数字支持的交付,以减少接受药物使用治疗的男性的亲密伴侣暴力行为:一项可行性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 24;14:1253126. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1253126. eCollection 2023.
5
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a healthy relationship tool for men who use intimate partner violence (BETTER MAN).使用亲密伴侣暴力的男性健康关系工具(BETTER MAN)的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 2;23(1):2395. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17032-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Rural young males' acceptance & receptiveness to technology-based interventions for dating violence prevention: A qualitative descriptive study.农村年轻男性对基于技术的干预措施接受和接受度,以预防约会暴力:定性描述性研究。
J Adolesc. 2021 Oct;92:137-151. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.08.012. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
2
An exploratory assessment of the preference for eHealth interventions to prevent HIV and sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men in Hanoi, Vietnam.对越南河内男男性行为者预防艾滋病毒和性传播感染的电子健康干预措施偏好的探索性评估。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 11;20(1):1387. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09449-z.
3
Effectiveness of ICT-based intimate partner violence interventions: a systematic review.基于信息通信技术的亲密伴侣暴力干预措施的有效性:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 7;20(1):1372. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09408-8.
4
Digital or Digitally Delivered Responses to Domestic and Intimate Partner Violence During COVID-19.新冠疫情期间针对家庭暴力和亲密伴侣暴力的数字化或线上回应
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jul 30;6(3):e19831. doi: 10.2196/19831.
5
New learnings on drivers of men's physical and/or sexual violence against their female partners, and women's experiences of this, and the implications for prevention interventions.关于男性对其女性伴侣实施身体和/或性暴力的驱动因素,以及女性对此的体验方面的新认识,以及对预防干预措施的影响。
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1739845. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1739845.
6
Impact of male-only lifestyle interventions on men's mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.仅针对男性的生活方式干预对男性心理健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2020 Jul;21(7):e13014. doi: 10.1111/obr.13014. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
7
'No one teaches us how to deal with this': General practitioners' experiences of working with men who use violence in relationships.“没有人教我们如何应对这个问题”:全科医生在处理人际关系中使用暴力的男性时的经验。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2019 Jul;48(7):487-491. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-12-18-4801.
8
An online healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing intimate partner violence (I-DECIDE): a randomised controlled trial.一项针对经历亲密伴侣暴力的女性的在线健康关系工具和安全决策辅助工具(I-DECIDE):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jun;4(6):e301-e310. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30079-9.
9
Evaluating the effectiveness of a website about masculinity and suicide to prompt help-seeking.评估一个关于男子气概和自杀的网站在促使人们寻求帮助方面的有效性。
Health Promot J Austr. 2019 Sep;30(3):381-389. doi: 10.1002/hpja.237. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
10
Still Looking for Mechanisms: A Realist Review of Batterer Intervention Programs.仍在探寻机制:施虐者干预项目的现实主义综述
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020 Oct;21(4):741-753. doi: 10.1177/1524838018791285. Epub 2018 Aug 20.