An Innovative National Programme for Comprehensive Chronic Wound Therapy and Its Impact on Treatment Outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Although the lifetime prevalence of chronic ulcers tends to be approximately 2.2-10 per 1000 population, no systemic solutions for this problem have been implemented in many countries. It is still not fully agreed whether treatment of chronic wounds requires hospitalization, which incurs high costs, or whether the therapy can be carried out entirely in an outpatient setting. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year activity and effectiveness of a national programme for the comprehensive treatment of chronic wounds based on hybrid care for patients. Treatment of nonhealing chronic wounds begins in the hospital, where necessary diagnostic actions are carried out, followed by surgical cleansing of the wound and selection of appropriate dressings. Then, the treatment is continued in the outpatient setting with a continuous patient education. The programme is divided into four subsequent stages. In addition, the present study compared the effectiveness of chronic wound treatment with that in the period before implementation of the programme.

METHODS

From January 2015 to December 2019, 383 patients were treated at a centre for chronic wounds. We analysed the outcomes in 227 individuals with chronic venous ulceration or diabetic foot syndrome.

RESULTS

The mean wound area at the time of introduction of treatment was 36 cm2 (1-290; SD 34). After three stages of treatment, wounds were completely healed in 139 patients (61.2%), 78 patients with venous ulcers (55.3%) and 61 patients with diabetic foot (70.9%). In an additional 67 cases (29.5%), a significant reduction in wound area and depth was achieved, and the treatment was continued beyond the actual treatment programme. No significant effect was achieved in 21 patients (9.2%). In the group of patients treated without systematic application of the guidelines of the programme, wound healing occurred only in 19 cases (26.8%), reduction in the wound area occurred in 27 patients (38.0%), and lack of any healing progress or even worsening of the wound status was found in the remaining 25 cases (35.2%); these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of chronic wounds based on a systematic dedicated programme using an experienced multidisciplinary team of professionals allows to obtain better results in terms of reduction in wound area and might be an effective procedure. The combination of frequent, scheduled outpatient visits, access to inpatient treatment, and regular education of patients based on a standard form improves treatment outcomes.