Angle Orthod. 2021 Mar 1;91(2):164-170. doi: 10.2319/072220-646.1.
To investigate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Invisalign's G5 protocol with virtual bite ramps in the treatment of adults with skeletal deep bites.
This retrospective study was conducted on consecutively treated adults presenting with skeletal deep bites as defined by the Overbite Depth Indicator (ODI). Subjects were divided into 2 groups: Invisalign group (n = 24) treated with the Invisalign G5 protocol and a full fixed appliance (FFA) group (n = 24) treated with edgewise FFAs and matched to the Invisalign group by ODI, sex, type of malocclusion, and non-extraction treatment. Pretreatment (T1) and post-comprehensive treatment (T2) lateral cephalograms were obtained and analyzed.
Both the Invisalign and FFA groups showed significant changes from T1 to T2 in ODI and other skeletal and dentoalveolar measurements. The mean change in ODI was -1.5° (P < .001) for the Invisalign group and -2.0° (P < .001) for the FFA group. The mean decrease in overbite was 1.3 mm (P < .001) and 2.0 mm (P < .001) for the Invisalign and FFA groups, respectively. The mean increase in mandibular plane angle (Sn-GoGn) was 0.65° (P = .003) for the Invisalign group and 1.15° (P < .001) for the FFA group. When the groups were compared with each other, both ODI (P = .03) and overbite (P = .003) were significantly different in addition to other measurements.
Although FFA treatment had more apparent skeletal changes for deep bite adult patients when compared with Invisalign, both systems were effective in opening deep bites at dentoalveolar and skeletal levels.
研究 Invisalign G5 方案结合虚拟咬合斜坡在治疗骨性深覆合成人中的骨骼和牙颌效果。
本回顾性研究纳入了被定义为覆牙合深度指标(Overbite Depth Indicator,ODI)深覆合的连续治疗的成人患者。患者被分为 2 组:使用 Invisalign G5 方案和全固定矫治器(fixed appliance,FA)的 Invisalign 组(n = 24),和匹配 Invisalign 组的 ODI、性别、错合类型和非拔牙治疗的 Edgewise FA 组(n = 24)。获得并分析治疗前(T1)和综合治疗后(T2)的侧位头颅侧位片。
Invisalign 组和 FA 组在 ODI 和其他骨骼及牙颌测量指标上均显示出从 T1 到 T2 的显著变化。Invisalign 组的 ODI 平均变化为-1.5°(P <.001),FA 组为-2.0°(P <.001)。Invisalign 组和 FA 组的覆牙合平均减少量分别为 1.3mm(P <.001)和 2.0mm(P <.001)。Invisalign 组下颌平面角(Sn-GoGn)平均增加 0.65°(P =.003),FA 组增加 1.15°(P <.001)。当组间比较时,除其他测量指标外,ODI(P =.03)和覆牙合(P =.003)均有显著差异。
虽然与 Invisalign 相比,FA 治疗对于骨性深覆合成年患者的骨骼变化更为明显,但两种系统在牙颌和骨骼水平上均能有效打开深覆合。