Cho Beomyoung, Hirschtick Jana L, Usidame Bukola, Meza Rafael, Mistry Ritesh, Land Stephanie R, Levy David T, Holford Theodore, Fleischer Nancy L
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Apr;68(4):750-757. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.11.019. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
This study examines sociodemographic patterns of exclusive/dual/polytobacco use among U.S. high school students using multiple national surveys.
Using three national youth surveys (Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health [PATH] Wave 4 [2016-2017], 2017 Youth Risk Behavior Survey, and 2017 National Youth Tobacco Survey), we classified tobacco products into four groups: (1) electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), (2) conventional cigarettes (CCs), (3) other combustible tobacco products, and (4) smokeless tobacco products. We created 16 categories of non/exclusive/dual/polytobacco use within the past 30 days using the four product groups and calculated weighted population prevalence by sex and race/ethnicity (all surveys) and parental education and income (PATH), based on variable availability.
The results from 9,331, 12,407, and 9,699 high school students in PATH, Youth Risk Behavior Survey, and National Youth Tobacco Survey, respectively, largely agreed and pointed to similar conclusions. ENDS was the most prevalent exclusive use product (3.8%-5.2% across surveys), with CCs falling to second or third (1.2%-2.0% across surveys). By sex, exclusive, dual, and poly smokeless tobacco product use were more common for males, whereas exclusive CC use was more common for females. By race/ethnicity, non-Hispanic Whites had a higher prevalence of exclusive ENDS use and ENDS/CC dual use than non-Hispanic Blacks. As income and parental education levels increased from low to high, the prevalence of exclusive CC use decreased, whereas the prevalence of exclusive ENDS use increased.
Understanding sociodemographic patterns of tobacco use can help identify groups who may be at greater risk for tobacco-related health outcomes.
本研究利用多项全国性调查,考察美国高中生中单一/双重/多种烟草使用的社会人口学模式。
利用三项全国青少年调查(烟草与健康人口评估[PATH]第4波[2016 - 2017年]、2017年青少年危险行为调查和2017年全国青少年烟草调查),我们将烟草产品分为四类:(1)电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS),(2)传统香烟(CCs),(3)其他可燃烟草产品,以及(4)无烟烟草产品。我们根据四个产品组,在过去30天内创建了16种非/单一/双重/多种烟草使用类别,并根据变量可得性,按性别和种族/族裔(所有调查)以及父母教育程度和收入(PATH)计算加权人群患病率。
PATH、青少年危险行为调查和全国青少年烟草调查中分别有9331名、12407名和9699名高中生的结果基本一致,并指向类似结论。ENDS是最普遍的单一使用产品(各调查中为3.8% - 5.2%),CCs降至第二或第三(各调查中为1.2% - 2.0%)。按性别划分,男性单一、双重和多种无烟烟草产品使用更为常见,而女性单一CC使用更为常见。按种族/族裔划分,非西班牙裔白人单一ENDS使用和ENDS/CC双重使用的患病率高于非西班牙裔黑人。随着收入和父母教育水平从低到高增加,单一CC使用的患病率下降,而单一ENDS使用的患病率上升。
了解烟草使用的社会人口学模式有助于识别可能面临更高烟草相关健康后果风险的群体。