Ludwig I H, Parks M M, Getson P R, Kammerman L A
Department of Ophthalmology, Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital, Cooperstown, New York 13326.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1988 Jan-Feb;25(1):8-12. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19880101-04.
We analyzed the claim that accommodative esotropia tends to deteriorate with greater frequency if the accommodation convergence relationship (AC/A) is high. Records of 119 patients whose eyes were aligned with spectacles alone were studied. Their AC/A relationships were graded according to the difference between the distance and near measurements: normal included 0 to 9 prism diopters (delta) difference; grade 1 ranged from 10 to 19 delta difference; grade 2 from 20 to 29 delta difference; and in grade 3 the difference was 30 delta or greater. Deterioration is characterized by a nonaccommodative component of esotropia greater than 10 delta at distance becoming superimposed on the initial accommodative esotropia. Deterioration occurred in 7.7% of patients with a normal AC/A, 25% with grade 1 high AC/A, 44% with grade 2 high AC/A, and 52% with grade 3 high AC/A. Hypotheses were investigated using chi square, t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and log linear analyses. Distributional differences were highly significant by chi square test (p = 0.001) with a rejection of the null hypothesis of no difference between the groups at the alpha = 0.05 level. An alternate analysis of average AC/A ratio in the deteriorated versus nondeteriorated patients was equally statistically significant by the t-test. Hypermetropia was significantly higher in the normal AC/A group. Multi-factor comparisons showed that time-to-deterioration, treatment delay, age of onset, and amblyopia were factors that did not relate significantly to the incidence of deterioration.
我们分析了这样一种观点,即如果调节性集合关系(AC/A)较高,调节性内斜视恶化的频率往往更高。研究了119例仅通过佩戴眼镜使双眼保持正位的患者记录。根据远距离和近距离测量值之间的差异对他们的AC/A关系进行分级:正常包括0至9棱镜度(Δ)的差异;1级范围为10至19Δ的差异;2级为20至29Δ的差异;3级差异为30Δ或更大。恶化的特征是远距离时内斜视的非调节性成分大于10Δ叠加在初始调节性内斜视之上。AC/A正常的患者中7.7%出现恶化,AC/A为1级高值的患者中25%出现恶化,AC/A为2级高值的患者中44%出现恶化,AC/A为3级高值的患者中52%出现恶化。使用卡方检验、t检验、方差分析(ANOVA)和对数线性分析对假设进行了研究。通过卡方检验,分布差异具有高度显著性(p = 0.001),在α = 0.05水平上拒绝了各组之间无差异的零假设。对恶化患者与未恶化患者的平均AC/A比值进行的另一种分析通过t检验同样具有统计学显著性。AC/A正常组的远视度数显著更高。多因素比较表明,恶化时间、治疗延迟、发病年龄和弱视与恶化发生率无显著相关性。