Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
mBio. 2021 Jan 12;12(1):e02698-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02698-20.
Despite being nearly 10 months into the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, the definitive animal host for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), the causal agent of COVID-19, remains unknown. Unfortunately, similar problems exist for other betacoronaviruses, and no vouchered specimens exist to corroborate host species identification for most of these pathogens. This most basic information is critical to the full understanding and mitigation of emerging zoonotic diseases. To overcome this hurdle, we recommend that host-pathogen researchers adopt vouchering practices and collaborate with natural history collections to permanently archive microbiological samples and host specimens. Vouchered specimens and associated samples provide both repeatability and extension to host-pathogen studies, and using them mobilizes a large workforce (i.e., biodiversity scientists) to assist in pandemic preparedness. We review several well-known examples that successfully integrate host-pathogen research with natural history collections (e.g., yellow fever, hantaviruses, helminths). However, vouchering remains an underutilized practice in such studies. Using an online survey, we assessed vouchering practices used by microbiologists (e.g., bacteriologists, parasitologists, virologists) in host-pathogen research. A much greater number of respondents permanently archive microbiological samples than archive host specimens, and less than half of respondents voucher host specimens from which microbiological samples were lethally collected. To foster collaborations between microbiologists and natural history collections, we provide recommendations for integrating vouchering techniques and archiving of microbiological samples into host-pathogen studies. This integrative approach exemplifies the premise underlying One Health initiatives, providing critical infrastructure for addressing related issues ranging from public health to global climate change and the biodiversity crisis.
尽管 COVID-19(2019 年冠状病毒病)大流行已近 10 个月,但导致 COVID-19 的 SARS-CoV-2(严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2)的明确动物宿主仍然未知。不幸的是,其他β冠状病毒也存在类似的问题,而且对于这些病原体中的大多数,都没有凭证标本来证实宿主物种的鉴定。这些最基本的信息对于全面了解和减轻新发人畜共患病至关重要。为了克服这一障碍,我们建议宿主-病原体研究人员采用凭证制度,并与自然历史收藏合作,永久存档微生物样本和宿主标本。凭证标本和相关样本为宿主-病原体研究提供了可重复性和扩展性,并且使用它们可以调动大量劳动力(即生物多样性科学家)来协助大流行的准备工作。我们回顾了一些成功将宿主-病原体研究与自然历史收藏相结合的著名例子(例如黄热病、汉坦病毒、寄生虫)。然而,凭证制度在这些研究中仍然未得到充分利用。我们使用在线调查评估了宿主-病原体研究中微生物学家(例如细菌学家、寄生虫学家、病毒学家)使用的凭证制度。有更多的受访者永久性地存档微生物样本,而不是存档宿主标本,而且不到一半的受访者凭证了从其身上采集致死性微生物样本的宿主标本。为了促进微生物学家和自然历史收藏之间的合作,我们提供了将凭证技术和微生物样本存档纳入宿主-病原体研究的建议。这种综合方法体现了“One Health”倡议的前提,为解决从公共卫生到全球气候变化和生物多样性危机等相关问题提供了关键基础设施。