Szentivanyi Tamara, McKee Clifton, Jones Gareth, Foster Jeffrey T
Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, Hungary.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2023 Mar 27;2023:9285855. doi: 10.1155/2023/9285855. eCollection 2023.
Bats have received considerable recent attention for infectious disease research because of their potential to host and transmit viruses, including Ebola, Hendra, Nipah, and multiple coronaviruses. These pathogens are occasionally transmitted from bats to wildlife, livestock, and to humans, directly or through other bridging (intermediate) hosts. Due to their public health relevance, zoonotic viruses are a primary focus of research attention. In contrast, other emerging pathogens of bats, such as bacteria, are vastly understudied despite their ubiquity and diversity. Here, we describe the currently known host ranges and geographic distributional patterns of potentially zoonotic bacterial genera in bats, using published presence-absence data of pathogen occurrence. We identify apparent gaps in our understanding of the distribution of these pathogens on a global scale. The most frequently detected bacterial genera in bats are , , and . However, a wide variety of other potentially zoonotic bacterial genera are also occasionally found in bats, such as , , , , , , , and . The bat families Phyllostomidae, Vespertilionidae, and Pteropodidae are most frequently reported as hosts of bacterial pathogens; however, the presence of at least one bacterial genus was confirmed in all 15 bat families tested. On a spatial scale, molecular diagnostics of samples from 58 countries and four overseas departments and island states (French Guiana, Mayotte, New Caledonia, and Réunion Island) reported testing for at least one bacterial pathogen in bats. We also identified geographical areas that have been mostly neglected during bacterial pathogen research in bats, such as the Afrotropical region and Southern Asia. Current knowledge on the distribution of potentially zoonotic bacterial genera in bats is strongly biased by research effort towards certain taxonomic groups and geographic regions. Identifying these biases can guide future surveillance efforts, contributing to a better understanding of the ecoepidemiology of zoonotic pathogens in bats.
由于蝙蝠有携带和传播包括埃博拉病毒、亨德拉病毒、尼帕病毒和多种冠状病毒在内的病毒的可能性,它们最近在传染病研究中受到了相当多的关注。这些病原体偶尔会直接或通过其他中间宿主从蝙蝠传播到野生动物、家畜和人类身上。由于其与公共卫生的相关性,人畜共患病毒是研究关注的主要焦点。相比之下,蝙蝠的其他新兴病原体,如细菌,尽管无处不在且种类繁多,但却被极大地忽视了。在这里,我们利用已发表的病原体存在与否的数据,描述了蝙蝠中潜在人畜共患细菌属目前已知的宿主范围和地理分布模式。我们发现了在全球范围内对这些病原体分布的理解上明显存在的差距。在蝙蝠中最常检测到的细菌属是 、 和 。然而,在蝙蝠中偶尔也会发现各种各样其他潜在的人畜共患细菌属,如 、 、 、 、 、 、 和 。叶口蝠科、蝙蝠科和狐蝠科被报道为细菌病原体最常见的宿主;然而,在所有测试的15个蝙蝠科中都证实至少存在一种细菌属。在空间尺度上,对来自58个国家以及四个海外省和岛屿国家(法属圭亚那、马约特岛、新喀里多尼亚和留尼汪岛)的样本进行的分子诊断报告称,已对蝙蝠中至少一种细菌病原体进行了检测。我们还确定了在蝙蝠细菌病原体研究中大多被忽视的地理区域,如非洲热带地区和南亚。目前关于蝙蝠中潜在人畜共患细菌属分布的知识因对某些分类群和地理区域的研究工作而存在严重偏差。识别这些偏差可以指导未来的监测工作,有助于更好地理解蝙蝠中人畜共患病原体的生态流行病学。