Suppr超能文献

系统评价和荟萃分析血清脂质谱预测糖尿病神经病变。

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the serum lipid profile in prediction of diabetic neuropathy.

机构信息

National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Metabolic Syndrome Research Center, Key Laboratory of Diabetes Immunology, Ministry of Education, and Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Hunan, 410011, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):499. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79276-0.

Abstract

Whether the lipid profile in diabetic patients is associated with diabetic neuropathy (DN) development remains ambiguous, as does the predictive value of serum lipid levels in the risk of DN. Here, we performed the first meta-analysis designed to investigate the relationship between DN and the serum levels of triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL). Candidate studies were comprehensively identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases up to May 2020. Observational methodological meta-analysis was conducted to assess the relationships of TG, TC, HDL, and LDL levels with DN. Changes in blood lipids were used to estimate the effect size. The results were pooled using a random-effects or fixed-effects model. Potential sources of heterogeneity were explored by subgroup analysis. Various outcomes were included, and statistical analyses were performed using STATA (Version 12.0). Mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was applied to assess the methodological quality. I2 statistics were calculated to evaluate statistical heterogeneity. Funnel plots were utilized to test for publication bias. A sensitivity analysis was performed by omitting each study one by one. Thirty-nine clinical trials containing 32,668 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that DN patients showed higher TG and lower HDL levels (MD = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.20-0.48 for TG; MD = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.08--0.02, I = 81.3% for HDL) than controls. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) neuropathy had elevated TG levels in their serum (MD = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.16-0.35,I = 64.4% for T1DM). However, only patients with T1DM neuropathy had reduced serum HDL levels, and there was no significant difference in serum HDL levels between patients with T2DM neuropathy and controls (MD = -0.07, 95% CI: -0.10--0.03, I = 12.4% for T1DM; MD = -0.02, 95% CI: -0.07-0.03, I = 80.2% for T2DM). TC and LDL levels were not significantly different between DN patients and controls (MD = -0.03, 95% CI: -0.14-0.09, I = 82.9% for TC; MD = -0.00, 95% CI: -0.08-0.08, I = 78.9% for LDL). In addition, compared with mild or painless DN patients, those with moderate or severe pain DN pain had significantly reduced serum TC and LDL levels (MD = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.49--0.13, I = 0% for TC; MD = -0.19, 95% CI: -0.32--0.08, I = 0% for LDL). TG levels and HDL levels did not vary considerably between patients with mild or painless DN and those with moderate or severe DN pain patients (MD = 0.12, 95% CI: -0.28-0.51, I = 83.2% for TG; MD = -0.07, 95% CI:-0.14-0.01, I = 58.8% for HDL). Furthermore, people with higher TG and LDL levels had higher risk of DN (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.20-1.54, I = 86.1% for TG and OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.19, I = 17.8% for LDL). Conversely, high serum HDL levels reduced the risk of DN (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.96, I = 72.6%), while TC levels made no significant difference with the risk of DN (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04, I = 84.7%). This meta-analysis indicated that serum lipid profile changes are among the biological characteristics of DN. Lipid levels should be explored as routine laboratory markers for predicting the risk of DN, as they will help clinicians choose appropriate therapies, and thus optimize the use of available resources.

摘要

血清脂质谱与糖尿病周围神经病变的关系及其在糖尿病周围神经病变风险预测中的价值仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨血清甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL)水平与糖尿病周围神经病变的关系。通过检索 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 数据库,对截至 2020 年 5 月的候选研究进行了全面识别。采用观察性方法荟萃分析评估 TG、TC、HDL 和 LDL 水平与糖尿病周围神经病变的关系。使用变化的血液脂质来估计效应大小。使用随机效应或固定效应模型汇总结果。通过亚组分析探讨潜在的异质性来源。纳入了各种结局,并使用 STATA(版本 12.0)进行统计分析。采用均数差(MDs)和比值比(ORs)及其 95%置信区间(CIs)进行估计。应用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估方法学质量。计算 I2 统计量评估统计异质性。使用漏斗图检验发表偏倚。通过逐一剔除每个研究进行敏感性分析。该荟萃分析纳入了 39 项临床试验,共 32668 名患者。结果表明,糖尿病周围神经病变患者的血清 TG 水平升高,而 HDL 水平降低(MD=0.34,95%CI:0.20-0.48 对于 TG;MD=-0.05,95%CI:-0.08--0.02,I=81.3%对于 HDL)。亚组分析显示,1 型糖尿病神经病变患者的血清 TG 水平升高(MD=0.25,95%CI:0.16-0.35,I=64.4%对于 1 型糖尿病)。然而,只有 1 型糖尿病神经病变患者的血清 HDL 水平降低,而 2 型糖尿病神经病变患者与对照组之间的血清 HDL 水平没有显著差异(MD=-0.07,95%CI:-0.10--0.03,I=12.4%对于 1 型糖尿病;MD=-0.02,95%CI:-0.07-0.03,I=80.2%对于 2 型糖尿病)。TC 和 LDL 水平在糖尿病周围神经病变患者与对照组之间没有显著差异(MD=-0.03,95%CI:-0.14-0.09,I=82.9%对于 TC;MD=-0.00,95%CI:-0.08-0.08,I=78.9%对于 LDL)。此外,与轻度或无痛性糖尿病周围神经病变患者相比,中度或重度疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变患者的血清 TC 和 LDL 水平显著降低(MD=-0.31,95%CI:-0.49--0.13,I=0%对于 TC;MD=-0.19,95%CI:-0.32--0.08,I=0%对于 LDL)。轻度或无痛性糖尿病周围神经病变患者与中度或重度疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变患者之间的 TG 和 HDL 水平没有显著差异(MD=0.12,95%CI:-0.28-0.51,I=83.2%对于 TG;MD=-0.07,95%CI:-0.14-0.01,I=58.8%对于 HDL)。此外,TG 和 LDL 水平较高的人患糖尿病周围神经病变的风险较高(OR=1.36,95%CI:1.20-1.54,I=86.1%对于 TG 和 OR=1.10,95%CI:1.02-1.19,I=17.8%对于 LDL)。相反,高血清 HDL 水平降低了糖尿病周围神经病变的风险(OR=0.85,95%CI:0.75-0.96,I=72.6%),而 TC 水平与糖尿病周围神经病变的风险无显著差异(OR=1.02,95%CI:1.00-1.04,I=84.7%)。本荟萃分析表明,血清脂质谱变化是糖尿病周围神经病变的生物学特征之一。血脂水平应作为预测糖尿病周围神经病变风险的常规实验室标志物进行探讨,因为这将有助于临床医生选择合适的治疗方法,从而优化现有资源的利用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c3b/7804465/d1fbf5e76c38/41598_2020_79276_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验