Suppr超能文献

引导组织再生联合骨替代移植治疗Ⅱ度根分叉病变的系统评价和 Meta 分析。

Bone replacement grafts with guided tissue regeneration in treatment of grade II furcation defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Periodontics & Implantology, VSPM Dental College and Research Centre, Digdoh Hills, Hingna Road, Nagpur, 440019, India.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):807-821. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03776-0. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

Abstract

AIM

The present systematic review appended with meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of bone replacement graft (BRG) with guided tissue regeneration (GTR) over BRG or open flap debridement (OFD) alone in the treatment of grade II furcation defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases accompanied with manual searching was done. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to October 2019, comparing BRG+GTR with BRG or OFD in grade II furcation defects, were identified. Clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, changes in gingival marginal level (GML), vertical defect fill (VDF), horizontal defect fill (HDF) and reduction in defect volume were the outcome parameters.

RESULTS

Of a total of 12, 9 studies compared BRG+GTR vs BRG while 3 compared BRG+GTR vs OFD. Meta-analysis was carried out for CAL gain, VDF, HDF and GML changes. In the BRG+GTR vs BRG comparison group, out of 9 studies, 6 RCTs showed standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.513 for VDF, 9 RCTs showed SMD of 0.83 for HDF and 2 RCTs showed SMD of 0.651 for CAL gain, whereas only 2 studies in the same group reported reduction in defect volume. Three studies of the BRG+GTR vs OFD group exhibited significant VDF and CAL gain with SMD of 2.002 and 1.161 respectively. However, no significant change was recorded for GML in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The present systematic review indicates supplemental benefits of combination therapy of BRG+GTR over monotherapy in resolving grade II furcation defects.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In our quest to achieve maximum regeneration in grade II furcation defects, combination therapies such as BRG+GTR have been accepted as treatment choices over other modalities. Clinical situations warranting near-complete regeneration of the tissues in such defects are better suited for combination therapies.

摘要

目的

本系统评价通过荟萃分析评估了在治疗 II 度分叉缺损时,骨替代移植物(BRG)联合引导组织再生(GTR)与单独使用 BRG 或开放式翻瓣清创术(OFD)相比的疗效。

材料和方法

对 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Google Scholar 数据库进行电子文献检索,并进行手动检索。确定了截至 2019 年 10 月比较 BRG+GTR 与 BRG 或 OFD 治疗 II 度分叉缺损的随机对照试验(RCT)。临床附着水平(CAL)增加、牙龈边缘水平(GML)变化、垂直缺损填充(VDF)、水平缺损填充(HDF)和缺损体积减少是观察指标。

结果

共有 12 项研究比较了 BRG+GTR 与 BRG,3 项研究比较了 BRG+GTR 与 OFD。对 CAL 增加、VDF、HDF 和 GML 变化进行了荟萃分析。在 BRG+GTR 与 BRG 比较组中,9 项研究中的 6 项 RCT 显示 VDF 的标准化均数差(SMD)为 0.513,9 项 RCT 显示 HDF 的 SMD 为 0.83,2 项 RCT 显示 CAL 增加的 SMD 为 0.651,而同一组中只有 2 项研究报告了缺损体积的减少。BRG+GTR 与 OFD 组的 3 项研究显示 VDF 和 CAL 增益具有显著意义,SMD 分别为 2.002 和 1.161。然而,两组的 GML 均无显著变化。

结论

本系统评价表明,BRG+GTR 联合治疗在解决 II 度分叉缺损方面优于单一治疗。

临床相关性

在我们寻求在 II 度分叉缺损中实现最大组织再生的过程中,BRG+GTR 等联合治疗已被接受为优于其他治疗方式的治疗选择。在需要组织在这些缺损中几乎完全再生的临床情况下,联合治疗更合适。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验