Division of Comprehensive Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry & Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
J Oral Rehabil. 2021 May;48(5):582-591. doi: 10.1111/joor.13147. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
Although a food acceptance questionnaire is useful for subjective masticatory function assessments, its characteristics and limitations when applied to patients with removable dentures have been unclear. We therefore assessed the relationship between the subjective and objective masticatory function and explored whether or not a decreased masticatory function could be evaluated by food acceptance questionnaire.
One hundred and nineteen patients >60 years old with removable partial and/or complete dentures participated. Food acceptance score (FAS) was calculated by using Sato's questionnaire with 20 food items. Masticatory performance (MP) was assessed by a visual scoring method using a test gummy jelly (UHA Mikakuto). Simple/multiple regression analyses were performed to explain the objective masticatory function. The cut-off value of FAS was determined to predict a decreased masticatory function by sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics curve.
No significant gender differences in MP or FAS were noted. Although both MP and FAS increased with the number of functional teeth, FAS was not significantly affected by age. The number of functional teeth, FAS and age had significant correlations with MP, with the number of functional teeth showing the strongest correlation. Multiple linear regression analyses identified the FAS as a significant explanatory variable for MP, and 70 was the optimal cut-off value for detecting a decreased masticatory function (MP score ≤ 2) in the diagnosis of 'oral hypofunction'.
Using FAS to assess the MP was deemed appropriate, and a score of 70 was the optimal cut-off value for detecting a decreased masticatory function.
尽管食物接受问卷对于主观咀嚼功能评估很有用,但当应用于可摘义齿患者时,其特点和局限性尚不清楚。因此,我们评估了主观和客观咀嚼功能之间的关系,并探讨了是否可以通过食物接受问卷评估咀嚼功能下降。
共有 119 名年龄在 60 岁以上的可摘局部和/或全口义齿患者参与。食物接受评分(FAS)通过 Sato 问卷中的 20 种食物计算得出。咀嚼性能(MP)通过使用 UHA Mikakuto 测试胶姆糖的视觉评分方法进行评估。采用简单/多元回归分析来解释客观咀嚼功能。通过敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线确定 FAS 的截断值来预测咀嚼功能下降。
MP 或 FAS 在性别上无显著差异。尽管 MP 和 FAS 都随功能牙数的增加而增加,但 FAS 不受年龄的显著影响。功能牙数、FAS 和年龄与 MP 有显著相关性,其中功能牙数的相关性最强。多元线性回归分析确定 FAS 是 MP 的重要解释变量,70 是诊断“口腔功能减退”时检测咀嚼功能下降(MP 评分≤2)的最佳截断值。
使用 FAS 评估 MP 是合适的,70 分是检测咀嚼功能下降的最佳截断值。