Sydney School of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia.
Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 13;9(1):e19958. doi: 10.2196/19958.
Dental caries is the most common multifactorial oral disease; it affects 60% to 90% of the global population. Dental caries is highly preventable through prevention behaviors aimed at improving oral hygiene, adequate fluoride usage, and dietary intake. Mobile apps have the potential to support patients with dental caries; however, little is known about the availability, target audience, quality, and features of these apps.
This review aims to systematically examine dental caries prevention apps; to describe their content, availability, target audience, and features; and to assess their quality.
We systematically identified and evaluated apps in a process paralleling a systematic review. This included a search strategy using search terms; an eligibility assessment using inclusion and exclusion criteria focused on accessibility and dental caries self-management behaviors, including oral hygiene, dietary intake, and fluoride usage; data extraction on app characteristics, including app store metrics; prevention behavior categorization; feature identification and description; a quality appraisal of all apps using the validated Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) assessment tool; and data comparison and analysis.
Using our search strategy, we retrieved 562 apps from the Google Play Store and iTunes available in Australia. Of these, 7.1% (40/562) of the apps fit our eligibility criteria, of which 55% (22/40) targeted adults, 93% (37/40) were free to download, and 65% (26/40) were recently updated. Oral hygiene was the most common dental caries prevention behavior domain, addressed in 93% (37/40) of the apps, while dietary intake was addressed in 45% (18/40) of the apps and fluoride usage was addressed in 42% (17/40) of the apps. Overall, 50% (20/40) of the apps addressed only 1 behavior, and 38% (15/40) of the apps addressed all 3 behaviors. The mean MARS score was 2.9 (SD 0.7; range 1.8-4.4), with 45% (18/40) of the apps categorized as high quality, with a rating above 3.0 out of 5.0. We identified 21 distinctive features across all dental caries prevention behaviors; however, the top 5 most common features focused on oral hygiene. The highest-ranking app was the Brush DJ app, with an overall MARS score of 4.4 and with the highest number of features (n=13). We did not find any apps that adequately addressed dental caries prevention behaviors in very young children.
Apps addressing dental caries prevention commonly focus on oral hygiene and target young adults; however, many are not of high quality. These apps use a range of features to support consumer engagement, and some of these features may be helpful for specific patient populations. However, it remains unclear how effective these apps are in improving dental caries outcomes, and further evaluation is required before they are widely recommended.
龋齿是最常见的多因素口腔疾病;它影响全球 60%至 90%的人口。通过旨在改善口腔卫生、适当使用氟化物和饮食摄入的预防行为,龋齿是可以高度预防的。移动应用程序有可能为患有龋齿的患者提供支持;然而,人们对这些应用程序的可用性、目标受众、质量和功能知之甚少。
本综述旨在系统地检查龋齿预防应用程序;描述其内容、可用性、目标受众和功能;并评估其质量。
我们系统地确定和评估了与系统审查并行的应用程序。这包括使用搜索词的搜索策略;使用侧重于可及性和龋齿自我管理行为(包括口腔卫生、饮食摄入和氟化物使用)的纳入和排除标准进行的适用性评估;提取应用程序特征,包括应用程序商店指标;预防行为分类;识别和描述特征;使用经过验证的移动应用程序评级量表 (MARS) 评估工具对所有应用程序进行质量评估;以及数据比较和分析。
使用我们的搜索策略,我们从澳大利亚的 Google Play 商店和 iTunes 中检索到了 562 个应用程序。其中,符合我们入选标准的应用程序占 7.1%(40/562),其中 55%(22/40)针对成年人,93%(37/40)可免费下载,65%(26/40)为最近更新。口腔卫生是最常见的龋齿预防行为领域,在 40 个应用程序中有 93%(37/40)都涉及到,而饮食摄入在 45%(18/40)的应用程序中涉及到,氟化物使用在 42%(17/40)的应用程序中涉及到。总体而言,50%(20/40)的应用程序仅涉及 1 种行为,38%(15/40)的应用程序涉及所有 3 种行为。平均 MARS 得分为 2.9(SD 0.7;范围 1.8-4.4),45%(18/40)的应用程序被归类为高质量,评分高于 5.0 分中的 3.0 分。我们在所有龋齿预防行为中都确定了 21 个独特的功能;然而,排名前 5 的最常见功能都集中在口腔卫生上。排名最高的应用程序是 Brush DJ 应用程序,其总体 MARS 得分为 4.4,功能最多(n=13)。我们没有发现任何能够充分解决幼儿龋齿预防行为的应用程序。
针对龋齿预防的应用程序通常侧重于口腔卫生,并针对年轻成年人;然而,许多应用程序的质量都不高。这些应用程序使用了一系列功能来支持消费者参与,其中一些功能可能对特定的患者群体有帮助。然而,目前尚不清楚这些应用程序在改善龋齿结果方面的有效性,在广泛推荐之前还需要进一步评估。