• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HEART评分对急性冠状动脉综合征和严重冠状动脉狭窄的预测价值。

The predictive value of HEART score for acute coronary syndrome and significant coronary artery stenosis.

作者信息

Han Changsung, Chung Heajin, Lee Youngjoo, Jang Hye Young, Cho Young Shin, Park Junbum, Kim Sang-Il

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;7(4):267-274. doi: 10.15441/ceem.19.084. Epub 2020 Dec 31.

DOI:10.15441/ceem.19.084
PMID:33440104
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7808829/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Rapid determination of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED) is very important for patients presenting with ischemic symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of HEART score for ACS and significant coronary artery stenosis (SCS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who visited the ED with chest discomfort and were admitted to the cardiology department. Enrolled patients were classified into ACS and non-ACS groups according to their discharge diagnosis. Patients who underwent imaging were further divided into SCS and non-SCS groups according to study results. We compared age, sex, vital signs, risk factors, electrocardiogram, troponin, and HEART score for each group. For ACS and SCS predictive performance, the test characteristics of HEART score was calculated using sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, likelihood ratio, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

Of 207 patients, 112 had ACS. Among enrolled patients, 155 underwent imaging workup, of whom 67 had SCS. HEART score ≤3 had 93% sensitivity for ACS and 97% for SCS. HEART score ≥7 had 82% specificity for ACS and 83% for SCS. HEART score area under ROC curve for ACS was 0.706 (95% confidence interval, 0.627-0.776) and 0.737 (95% confidence interval, 0.660-0.804) for SCS.

CONCLUSION

HEART score was a fair predictor of ACS and SCS in ED patients who presented with chest symptoms and were admitted to the cardiology department. The predictive power of HEART score was better for SCS than for ACS.

摘要

目的

对于出现缺血症状的患者,在急诊科(ED)快速诊断急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)非常重要。本研究的目的是确定HEART评分对ACS和严重冠状动脉狭窄(SCS)的预测价值。

方法

我们回顾性分析了因胸痛就诊于ED并入住心内科的患者数据。根据出院诊断将入选患者分为ACS组和非ACS组。接受影像学检查的患者根据检查结果进一步分为SCS组和非SCS组。我们比较了每组患者的年龄、性别、生命体征、危险因素、心电图、肌钙蛋白和HEART评分。对于ACS和SCS的预测性能,使用敏感性、特异性、预测值、似然比和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来计算HEART评分的检验特征。

结果

207例患者中,112例患有ACS。入选患者中,155例接受了影像学检查,其中67例患有SCS。HEART评分≤3对ACS的敏感性为93%,对SCS的敏感性为97%。HEART评分≥7对ACS的特异性为82%,对SCS的特异性为83%。ACS的ROC曲线下HEART评分面积为0.706(95%置信区间,0.627 - 0.776),SCS为0.737(95%置信区间,0.660 - 0.804)。

结论

对于因胸痛就诊于ED并入住心内科的患者,HEART评分是ACS和SCS的一个较好预测指标。HEART评分对SCS的预测能力优于对ACS的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdde/7808829/cc1c1f0b5269/ceem-19-084f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdde/7808829/bd6907f3edfc/ceem-19-084f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdde/7808829/08797c6efad6/ceem-19-084f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdde/7808829/cc1c1f0b5269/ceem-19-084f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdde/7808829/bd6907f3edfc/ceem-19-084f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdde/7808829/08797c6efad6/ceem-19-084f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdde/7808829/cc1c1f0b5269/ceem-19-084f3.jpg

相似文献

1
The predictive value of HEART score for acute coronary syndrome and significant coronary artery stenosis.HEART评分对急性冠状动脉综合征和严重冠状动脉狭窄的预测价值。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;7(4):267-274. doi: 10.15441/ceem.19.084. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
2
Heart rate variability risk score for prediction of acute cardiac complications in ED patients with chest pain.心率变异性风险评分预测急诊科胸痛患者急性心脏并发症的风险。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;31(8):1201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
3
A new score for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in acute chest pain with non-diagnostic ECG and normal troponin.一种用于诊断急性胸痛伴非诊断性心电图及肌钙蛋白正常的急性冠状动脉综合征的新评分系统。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Oct;32(10):764-8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203151. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
4
Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) in patients in an emergency department setting, suspected of acute coronary syndrome: optimal cut-off point, diagnostic value and future opportunities in primary care.急诊科疑似急性冠脉综合征患者的心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白(H-FABP):最佳切点、诊断价值及基层医疗的未来机遇
Eur J Gen Pract. 2015;21(3):156-63. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1013934. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
5
Novel Emergency Department Risk Score Discriminates Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Chest Pain Patients With Known Coronary Artery Disease.新型急诊科风险评分可鉴别已知冠状动脉疾病的胸痛患者中的急性冠状动脉综合征。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016 Dec;15(4):138-144. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000091.
6
A modified HEART risk score in chest pain patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.疑似非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征胸痛患者改良的 HEART 风险评分。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Jan;13(1):64-9. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.01.013.
7
An analysis of patients receiving emergency CAG without PCI and the value of GRACE score in predicting PCI possibilities in NSTE-ACS patients.接受急诊冠状动脉造影(CAG)但未行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者分析及GRACE评分在预测非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者PCI可能性中的价值
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015 May;12(3):246-50. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.03.008.
8
Frequency of acute coronary syndrome in patients with normal electrocardiogram performed during presence or absence of chest pain.胸痛发作时或未发作时心电图正常的患者中急性冠状动脉综合征的发生率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;16(6):495-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00420.x. Epub 2009 May 7.
9
HEART score and clinical gestalt have similar diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing ACS in an unselected population of patients with chest pain presenting in the ED.对于在急诊科就诊的胸痛患者这一未经过筛选的人群,HEART评分与临床综合判断在诊断急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)方面具有相似的诊断准确性。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Aug;32(8):595-600. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-203798. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
10
The utility of copeptin in the emergency department for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction rapid rule out: COPED-MIRRO study. copeptin 在急诊科非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死快速排除中的应用:COPED-MIRRO 研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;21(3):220-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3283632f8b.

本文引用的文献

1
2018 Korean Society for the Study of Obesity Guideline for the Management of Obesity in Korea.2018年韩国肥胖研究学会韩国肥胖管理指南
J Obes Metab Syndr. 2019 Mar;28(1):40-45. doi: 10.7570/jomes.2019.28.1.40. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
2
Prognostic Utility of a Modified HEART Score in Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department.改良HEART评分在急诊科胸痛患者中的预后评估效用
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Feb;10(2). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003101.
3
Predictive performance of quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment for mortality and ICU admission in patients with infection at the ED.
急诊科感染患者中快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估对死亡率和入住重症监护病房的预测性能。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;34(9):1788-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
Prognostic Factors in Chest Pain Patients: A Quantitative Analysis of the HEART Score.胸痛患者的预后因素:HEART评分的定量分析
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016 Jun;15(2):50-5. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000075.
5
2014 clinical practice guidelines for overweight and obesity in Korea.2014 年韩国超重和肥胖临床实践指南。
Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2014 Dec 29;29(4):405-9. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2014.29.4.405.
6
HEART score and clinical gestalt have similar diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing ACS in an unselected population of patients with chest pain presenting in the ED.对于在急诊科就诊的胸痛患者这一未经过筛选的人群,HEART评分与临床综合判断在诊断急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)方面具有相似的诊断准确性。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Aug;32(8):595-600. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-203798. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
7
A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department.急诊科胸痛患者HEART评分的前瞻性验证。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.255. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
8
ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)管理工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2011 Dec;32(23):2999-3054. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
9
Chest pain in the emergency room: value of the HEART score.急诊科胸痛:HEART 评分的价值。
Neth Heart J. 2008 Jun;16(6):191-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03086144.
10
Long-term outcome after an early invasive versus selective invasive treatment strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and elevated cardiac troponin T (the ICTUS trial): a follow-up study.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征合并肌钙蛋白T升高患者早期侵入性治疗与选择性侵入性治疗策略的长期预后(ICTUS试验):一项随访研究
Lancet. 2007 Mar 10;369(9564):827-835. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60410-3.