• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疑似非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征胸痛患者改良的 HEART 风险评分。

A modified HEART risk score in chest pain patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

机构信息

Emergency & Critical Care Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Department of Cardiology, the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Hebei Medical University, Hebei, China.

Emergency & Critical Care Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Jan;13(1):64-9. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.01.013.

DOI:10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.01.013
PMID:26918015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4753014/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate a modified HEART [History, Electrocardiograph (ECG), Age, Risk factors and Troponin] risk score in chest pain patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used a prospectively acquired database and chest pain patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected NSTE-ACS were enrolled. Data recorded on arrival at the ED were used. The serum sample of high-sensitivity cardiac Troponin I other than conventional cardiac Troponin I used in the HEART risk score was tested. The modified HEART risk score was calculated. The end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as a composite of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), percutaneous intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or all-cause death, within three months after initial presentation.

RESULTS

A total of 1,300 patients were enrolled. A total of 606 patients (46.6%) had a MACE within three months: 205 patients (15.8%) were diagnosed with AMI, 465 patients (35.8%) underwent PCI, and 119 patients (9.2%) underwent CABG. There were 10 (0.8%) deaths. A progressive, significant pattern of increasing event rate was observed as the score increased (P < 0.001 by χ (2) for trend). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.84. All patients were classified into three groups: low risk (score 0-2), intermediate risk (score 3-4), and high risk (score 5-10). Event rates were 1.1%, 18.5%, and 67.0%, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified HEART risk score was validated in chest pain patients with suspected NSTE-ACS and may complement MACE risk assessment and patients triage in the ED. A prospective study of the score is warranted.

摘要

目的

验证改良的 HEART(病史、心电图(ECG)、年龄、危险因素和肌钙蛋白)评分在急诊科(ED)疑似非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)胸痛患者中的有效性。

方法

本回顾性队列研究使用前瞻性采集的数据库,纳入因疑似 NSTE-ACS 而被收入 ED 的胸痛患者。使用 ED 就诊时记录的数据。除传统肌钙蛋白 I 外,还检测了 HEART 风险评分中使用的高敏肌钙蛋白 I 的血清样本。计算改良的 HEART 风险评分。终点是主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生,定义为初始表现后三个月内急性心肌梗死(AMI)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)、冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)或全因死亡的复合事件。

结果

共纳入 1300 例患者。共有 606 例(46.6%)患者在三个月内发生 MACE:205 例(15.8%)患者被诊断为 AMI,465 例(35.8%)患者接受了 PCI,119 例(9.2%)患者接受了 CABG。有 10 例(0.8%)患者死亡。随着评分的增加,观察到事件发生率呈逐渐显著增加的趋势(趋势检验 χ²值<0.001)。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.84。所有患者被分为三组:低危(评分 0-2)、中危(评分 3-4)和高危(评分 5-10)。各组的事件发生率分别为 1.1%、18.5%和 67.0%(P<0.001)。

结论

改良的 HEART 风险评分在疑似 NSTE-ACS 的胸痛患者中得到验证,可补充 ED 中 MACE 风险评估和患者分诊。需要前瞻性研究该评分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ae/4753014/99750e5ca0d5/jgc-13-01-064-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ae/4753014/f01cee7d77ac/jgc-13-01-064-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ae/4753014/99750e5ca0d5/jgc-13-01-064-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ae/4753014/f01cee7d77ac/jgc-13-01-064-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ae/4753014/99750e5ca0d5/jgc-13-01-064-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A modified HEART risk score in chest pain patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.疑似非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征胸痛患者改良的 HEART 风险评分。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Jan;13(1):64-9. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.01.013.
2
Prehospital Modified HEART Score Predictive of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前改良HEART评分对30天不良心脏事件的预测作用
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007154. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
3
[Development and prospective validation of an ischemic risk score for acute chest pain patients with normal high-sensitivity troponin I levels and without obvious ST-segment deviation].[高敏肌钙蛋白I水平正常且无明显ST段偏移的急性胸痛患者缺血风险评分的开发与前瞻性验证]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 24;46(2):131-136. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.02.012.
4
Pre-hospital evaluation of chest pain patients using the modified HEART-score: rationale and design.采用改良的 HEART 评分对胸痛患者进行院前评估:原理和设计。
Future Cardiol. 2024 Apr 25;20(5-6):241-250. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2356995. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
5
Prospective validation of a modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.前瞻性验证改良的心肌梗死溶栓治疗风险评分在急诊科胸痛且可能为急性冠脉综合征患者中的应用。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00696.x.
6
Fast assessment and management of chest pain patients without ST-elevation in the pre-hospital gateway (FamouS Triage): ruling out a myocardial infarction at home with the modified HEART score.在院前门户对无 ST 段抬高的胸痛患者进行快速评估和管理(FamouS Triage):用改良的 HEART 评分在家中排除心肌梗死。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Mar;7(2):102-110. doi: 10.1177/2048872616687116. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
7
Heart rate variability risk score for prediction of acute cardiac complications in ED patients with chest pain.心率变异性风险评分预测急诊科胸痛患者急性心脏并发症的风险。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;31(8):1201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
8
Risk stratifying chest pain patients in the emergency department using HEART, GRACE and TIMI scores, with a single contemporary troponin result, to predict major adverse cardiac events.使用 HEART、GRACE 和 TIMI 评分以及单次当代肌钙蛋白结果对急诊科胸痛患者进行风险分层,以预测主要不良心脏事件。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jul;35(7):420-427. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207172. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
[Dynamic changes of complement level in patients with acute coronary syndrome and its relationships with myocardial injury].急性冠状动脉综合征患者补体水平的动态变化及其与心肌损伤的关系
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Jun;29(6):515-519. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.06.008.
10
Early Exclusion of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.急诊科胸痛患者主要不良心脏事件的早期排除:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;53(3):287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.05.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of HEART, T-MACS, and HE-MACS scores for risk stratification and management of patients with chest pain in the emergency department.急诊科中用于胸痛患者风险分层及管理的HEART、T-MACS和HE-MACS评分的比较评估
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 7;104(6):e41432. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041432.
2
Assessing modified HEART scores with high-sensitivity troponin for low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.在急诊科使用高敏肌钙蛋白评估改良HEART评分用于低风险胸痛患者
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Apr;20(3):923-929. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03845-8. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
3
Retrospective review of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome presenting to the emergency department of a major tertiary center in Saudi Arabia.

本文引用的文献

1
Addition of heart score to high-sensitivity troponin T versus conventional troponin T in risk stratification of patients with chest pain at the coronary emergency rooms.在冠状动脉急诊室胸痛患者的危险分层中,将心脏评分与高敏肌钙蛋白 T 与传统肌钙蛋白 T 联合使用。
Neth Heart J. 2014 Dec;22(12):552-6. doi: 10.1007/s12471-014-0600-6.
2
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
3
对沙特阿拉伯一家大型三级中心急诊科收治的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征进行回顾性研究。
Ann Saudi Med. 2024 Jan-Feb;44(1):1-10. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2024.1. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
4
[Comparison of Heart, Grace Scores and clinical parameters as predictors of cardiovascular events in patients with chest pain in the Emergency Department].[比较心脏、Grace评分及临床参数作为急诊科胸痛患者心血管事件预测指标的研究]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2023 Dec 1;97:e202312102.
5
Performance of Prognostic Scoring Systems in MINOCA: A Comparison among GRACE, TIMI, HEART, and ACEF Scores.心肌梗死伴非阻塞性冠状动脉病变(MINOCA)中预后评分系统的性能:全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)、心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)、心肌梗死全球登记处(HEART)和急性冠状动脉事件全球注册欧洲分支(ACEF)评分的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 31;12(17):5687. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175687.
6
A Closer Look at the HEART Score.深入剖析HEART评分
Cardiol Res. 2022 Oct;13(5):255-263. doi: 10.14740/cr1432. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
7
Validation and modification of HEART score components for patients with chest pain in the emergency department.急诊科胸痛患者HEART评分组件的验证与修正
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;8(4):279-288. doi: 10.15441/ceem.20.106. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
8
Performance of the modified HEART score in an Asian population.改良HEART评分在亚洲人群中的表现。
Int J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug 19;13(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12245-020-00300-1.
9
The HEART score: A guide to its application in the emergency department.HEART评分:急诊科应用指南。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun 14;18(2):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.04.004. eCollection 2018 Jun.
10
Sex-Based Differences in the Performance of the HEART Score in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Chest Pain.因急性胸痛就诊于急诊科的患者中,HEART评分表现的性别差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jun 21;6(6):e005373. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005373.
The impact of the HEART risk score in the early assessment of patients with acute chest pain: design of a stepped wedge, cluster randomised trial.HEART 风险评分对急性胸痛患者早期评估的影响:一项阶梯式楔形、整群随机试验的设计。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013 Sep 26;13:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-13-77.
4
The HEART score for the assessment of patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a multinational validation study.用于急诊科胸痛患者评估的HEART评分:一项多国验证研究。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2013 Sep;12(3):121-6. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31828b327e.
5
Validation of high-sensitivity troponin I in a 2-hour diagnostic strategy to assess 30-day outcomes in emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndrome.高敏肌钙蛋白 I 在 2 小时诊断策略中的验证,以评估急诊科疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者 30 天结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 1;62(14):1242-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.078. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
6
A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department.急诊科胸痛患者HEART评分的前瞻性验证。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.255. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
7
Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.心肌梗死的第三次全球定义。
Circulation. 2012 Oct 16;126(16):2020-35. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
8
2-Hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT trial.2 小时加速诊断方案,使用当代肌钙蛋白作为唯一生物标志物评估胸痛症状患者:ADAPT 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 5;59(23):2091-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.035. Epub 2012 May 9.
9
Chest pain in the emergency room: a multicenter validation of the HEART Score.急诊室中的胸痛:HEART评分的多中心验证
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2010 Sep;9(3):164-9. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181ec36d8.
10
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗护理调查:2007年急诊科总结
Natl Health Stat Report. 2010 Aug 6(26):1-31.