• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种改良创伤和损伤严重程度评分的开发,用于预测急性创伤患者的残疾情况。

Development of a modified trauma and injury severity score to predict disability in acute trauma patients.

作者信息

Hong Ki Jeong, Song Kyoung Jun, Shin Sang Do, Ro Young Sun, Park Jeong Ho, Lee Seung Chul, Kim Chu Hyun

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;7(4):281-289. doi: 10.15441/ceem.19.097. Epub 2020 Dec 31.

DOI:10.15441/ceem.19.097
PMID:33440106
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7808827/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) has been used to predict trauma patient mortality and to assess the quality of trauma care systems. The goal of this investigation was to develop a modified trauma-related injury severity score (termed the TRISS-D) for predicting disability in acute trauma patients.

METHODS

We used data collected by emergency medical services and entered into the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention severe trauma database. The TRISS-D was based on age category (0-14, 15-54, ≥55 years), the Revised Trauma Score, and the Injury Severity Score. The outcome measures were severe disability and worsening disability. Worsening disability was defined as a lower Glasgow Outcome Scale score at hospital discharge than before the traumatic incident. Two types of cases were examined: those with penetrating or blunt injuries (group 1) and those with severe head injuries (group 2). We assessed the discriminatory power of the TRISS-D by calculating the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

RESULTS

The database comprised 14,791 patients; overall, 3,757 (25%) had severe disability and 6,018 (41%) had worsening disability. For severe disability, the AUROC (95% confidence interval) for the TRISS-D was 0.948 (0.944-0.952) in group 1 and 0.950 (0.946-0.954) in group 2. The corresponding values for worsening disability were 0.810 (0.803-0.817) and 0.816 (0.809-0.823), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The TRISS-D showed excellent discriminatory power for severe disability and very good discriminatory power for worsening disability.

摘要

目的

创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)已被用于预测创伤患者的死亡率,并评估创伤护理系统的质量。本研究的目的是开发一种改良的创伤相关损伤严重程度评分(称为TRISS-D),用于预测急性创伤患者的残疾情况。

方法

我们使用了紧急医疗服务收集的数据,并将其录入韩国疾病控制与预防中心的严重创伤数据库。TRISS-D基于年龄类别(0-14岁、15-54岁、≥55岁)、修订创伤评分和损伤严重程度评分。结局指标为严重残疾和残疾恶化。残疾恶化定义为出院时格拉斯哥预后评分低于创伤事件发生前。研究了两种类型的病例:穿透性或钝性损伤患者(第1组)和重度颅脑损伤患者(第2组)。我们通过计算受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)来评估TRISS-D的鉴别能力。

结果

该数据库包含14791例患者;总体而言,3757例(25%)有严重残疾,6018例(41%)有残疾恶化。对于严重残疾,TRISS-D在第1组中的AUROC(95%置信区间)为0.948(0.944-0.952),在第2组中为0.950(0.946-0.954)。残疾恶化的相应值分别为0.810(0.803-0.817)和0.816(0.809-0.823)。

结论

TRISS-D对严重残疾显示出优异的鉴别能力,对残疾恶化显示出良好的鉴别能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/525a/7808827/f2d4b80eb2c8/ceem-19-097f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/525a/7808827/f2d4b80eb2c8/ceem-19-097f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/525a/7808827/f2d4b80eb2c8/ceem-19-097f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a modified trauma and injury severity score to predict disability in acute trauma patients.一种改良创伤和损伤严重程度评分的开发,用于预测急性创伤患者的残疾情况。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;7(4):281-289. doi: 10.15441/ceem.19.097. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
2
A comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Trauma-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) for outcome assessment in intensive care unit trauma patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分与创伤严重程度评分(TRISS)在重症监护病房创伤患者预后评估中的比较。
Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;24(10):1642-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199610000-00007.
3
External validation of a modified trauma and injury severity score model in major trauma injury.改良创伤和损伤严重度评分模型在严重创伤损伤中的外部验证。
Injury. 2019 May;50(5):1118-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.12.031. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
4
Comparison of the trauma and injury severity score and modified early warning score with rapid lactate level (the ViEWS-L score) in blunt trauma patients.比较创伤和损伤严重程度评分与改良早期预警评分与快速乳酸水平(ViEWS-L 评分)在钝性创伤患者中的应用。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;21(3):199-205. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32836192d6.
5
Improving the TRISS methodology by restructuring age categories and adding comorbidities.通过重新构建年龄类别和增加合并症来改进创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)方法。
J Trauma. 2004 Apr;56(4):760-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000119199.52226.c0.
6
A comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Trauma-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) for outcome assessment in Srinagarind Intensive Care Unit trauma patients.宋卡琳医院重症监护病房创伤患者结局评估中急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)II评分与创伤损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Nov;95 Suppl 11:S25-33.
7
The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) revised.创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)修订版。
Injury. 2011 Jan;42(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.040.
8
Prediction of intra-hospital mortality after severe trauma: which pre-hospital score is the most accurate?严重创伤后院内死亡率的预测:哪种院前评分最准确?
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.035. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
9
A comparative analysis of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score in predicting high-value care outcomes in children with traumatic brain injury.创伤和损伤严重程度评分与损伤严重程度评分在预测创伤性脑损伤儿童高价值治疗结局中的比较分析。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2024 Sep 13;34(6):557-565. doi: 10.3171/2024.8.PEDS24309. Print 2024 Dec 1.
10
Predicting Outcomes of Penetrating Cardiovascular Injuries at a Rural Center by Different Scoring Systems.通过不同评分系统预测农村中心穿透性心血管损伤的结局
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Apr 1;35(2):198-205. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0403.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the criteria for early critical care resource use in assessing the effectiveness of field triage.验证早期重症监护资源使用标准在评估现场分诊效果中的有效性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;36(2):257-261. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.07.091. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
2
Injury severity measures for predicting return-to-work after a traumatic brain injury.用于预测创伤性脑损伤后重返工作岗位的损伤严重程度测量方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.025. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
3
Quality of life after brain injury (QOLIBRI): Italian validation of the proxy version.
脑损伤后生活质量量表(QOLIBRI):代理版的意大利语验证
Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;12(2):187-198. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1536-1. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
4
Update of the trauma risk adjustment model of the TraumaRegister DGU™: the Revised Injury Severity Classification, version II.创伤注册登记数据库DGU™创伤风险调整模型的更新:修订后的损伤严重程度分类,第二版。
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 5;18(5):476. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0476-2.
5
Increasing trauma deaths in the United States.美国创伤死亡人数增加。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jul;260(1):13-21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000600.
6
Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma: modelling effects of anatomic injury, acute physiology, age, and co-morbidity.挪威创伤生存预测模型:解剖损伤、急性生理学、年龄及合并症的建模效应
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Mar;58(3):303-15. doi: 10.1111/aas.12256. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
7
Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.291 种疾病和伤害导致的伤残调整生命年(DALYs)在 21 个地区,1990-2010 年:全球疾病负担研究 2010 的系统分析。
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2197-223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4.
8
Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.1990年和2010年20个年龄组中235种死因的全球和区域死亡率:全球疾病负担研究2010的系统分析
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2095-128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0.
9
Trend of mortality rate and injury burden of transport accidents, suicides, and falls.交通事故、自杀和跌倒的死亡率及伤害负担趋势。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2012 Jan;45(1):8-13. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2012.45.1.8. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
10
Modification of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method provides better survival prediction in Asian blunt trauma victims.改良创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)方法能更好地预测亚洲钝器创伤患者的生存情况。
World J Surg. 2012 Apr;36(4):813-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1498-z.