• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情防控的封城式隔离措施:2020 年 2 月至 8 月,南非、德国、巴西、西班牙、美国、意大利和新西兰相关数据的描述性生态学研究

Lockdown-type containment measures for COVID-19 prevention and control: a descriptive ecological study with data from South Africa, Germany, Brazil, Spain, United States, Italy and New Zealand, February - August 2020.

机构信息

Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Medicina, Pelotas, RS, Brasil.

Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Faculdade de Agronomia, Pelotas, RS, Brasil.

出版信息

Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2021 Jan 11;30(1):e2020513. doi: 10.1590/S1679-49742021000100025. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1590/S1679-49742021000100025
PMID:33440403
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe lockdown-type containment measures and COVID-19 incidence in South Africa, Germany, Brazil, Spain, United States, Italy and New Zealand.

METHODS

This is a descriptive ecological study with data on daily incidence of confirmed COVID-19 cases from February 22 to August 31 2020, as well as information on lockdown measures implemented by the governments of each country.

RESULTS

Daily COVID-19 incidence (cases per 1 million inhabitants) decreased within three weeks after lockdown started in the countries that implemented it: South Africa (3.7 to 1.7), Germany (37.5 to 33.7) Spain (176.3 to 82.0), Italy (92.0 to 52.1) and New Zealand (7.5 to 1.7). As for Brazil and the United States, which did not implement lockdown, there was no considerable decrease.

CONCLUSION

After lockdown implementation, there was a considerable decrease in the number of confirmed cases.

摘要

目的

描述南非、德国、巴西、西班牙、美国、意大利和新西兰的封锁式遏制措施和 COVID-19 发病率。

方法

这是一项描述性的生态学研究,数据来自 2020 年 2 月 22 日至 8 月 31 日期间每日确诊 COVID-19 病例,以及各国政府实施的封锁措施信息。

结果

实施封锁后,在实施封锁的国家中,COVID-19 发病率(每百万人中的病例数)在三周内下降:南非(3.7 降至 1.7)、德国(37.5 降至 33.7)、西班牙(176.3 降至 82.0)、意大利(92.0 降至 52.1)和新西兰(7.5 降至 1.7)。而巴西和美国没有实施封锁,因此没有明显下降。

结论

实施封锁后,确诊病例数量显著下降。

相似文献

1
Lockdown-type containment measures for COVID-19 prevention and control: a descriptive ecological study with data from South Africa, Germany, Brazil, Spain, United States, Italy and New Zealand, February - August 2020.新冠疫情防控的封城式隔离措施:2020 年 2 月至 8 月,南非、德国、巴西、西班牙、美国、意大利和新西兰相关数据的描述性生态学研究
Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2021 Jan 11;30(1):e2020513. doi: 10.1590/S1679-49742021000100025. eCollection 2021.
2
Estimates of the ongoing need for social distancing and control measures post-"lockdown" from trajectories of COVID-19 cases and mortality.根据新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)病例和死亡率的变化趋势,对“解封”后持续保持社交距离及采取管控措施的必要性进行评估。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Jul 23;56(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01483-2020. Print 2020 Jul.
3
Social distancing measures in the fight against COVID-19 in Brazil: description and epidemiological analysis by state.巴西抗击 COVID-19 中的社交距离措施:按州描述和流行病学分析。
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Sep 18;36(9):e00185020. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00185020. eCollection 2020.
4
Effect of national and local lockdowns on the control of COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.国家和地方封锁措施对 COVID-19 大流行控制的影响:快速综述。
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):60-68. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.104.
5
First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Data and Evidence.意大利的 COVID-19 大流行第一波:数据和证据。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1353:91-113. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-85113-2_6.
6
The heterogeneity of the COVID-19 pandemic and national responses: an explanatory mixed-methods study.新冠疫情的异质性与各国应对措施:一项解释性混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 1;21(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10885-8.
7
Timing of national lockdown and mortality in COVID-19: The Italian experience.国家封锁时间与 COVID-19 死亡率:意大利经验。
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;100:193-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
8
Forecasting COVID-19 Cases Using Alpha-Sutte Indicator: A Comparison with Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) Method.利用 Alpha-Sutte 指标预测 COVID-19 病例:与自回归积分移动平均 (ARIMA) 方法的比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 3;2020:8850199. doi: 10.1155/2020/8850199. eCollection 2020.
9
The association between COVID-19 cases and deaths and web-based public inquiries.新冠病毒病例和死亡与网络公众查询之间的关联。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2021 Mar;53(3):176-183. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2020.1856406. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
10
Impact of Victoria's Stage 3 lockdown on COVID-19 case numbers.维多利亚州三级封锁对新冠病毒病例数的影响。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213(11):494-496.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50872. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative spatial-temporal analysis of SARS-CoV-2 lineages B.1.1.33 and BQ.1.1 Omicron variant across pandemic phases.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)谱系B.1.1.33和BQ.1.1奥密克戎变种在疫情各阶段的时空比较分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 25;15(1):10319. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95140-5.
2
Adherence to social distancing measures in southern Brazil, 2020/2021: a cross-sectional study.2020/2021 年巴西南部社会隔离措施的遵守情况:一项横断面研究。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Jul 1;22:eAO0223. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0223. eCollection 2024.
3
Identification of methodological issues regarding direct impact indicators of COVID-19: a rapid scoping review on morbidity, severity and mortality.
识别 COVID-19 直接影响指标的方法学问题:发病率、严重程度和死亡率的快速范围综述。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Jul 1;34(Supplement_1):i3-i10. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae072.
4
Non-Pharmacologic Interventions in COVID-19 Pandemic Management; a Systematic Review.2019冠状病毒病大流行管理中的非药物干预措施;一项系统综述
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jul 23;11(1):e52. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.1828. eCollection 2023.
5
Effectiveness of social distancing measures and lockdowns for reducing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare, community-based settings.社交距离措施和封锁措施在减少非医疗、社区环境中的 COVID-19 传播方面的效果。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Oct 9;381(2257):20230132. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0132. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
6
Interferon β-1a ring prophylaxis to reduce household transmission of SARS-CoV-2: a cluster randomised clinical trial.干扰素β-1a环状预防措施以减少严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的家庭传播:一项整群随机临床试验
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jul 20;62:102082. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102082. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Prevalence and factors associated with self-reported anxiety in adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in Argentina, Brazil, Peru, Mexico, and Spain: A cross-sectional Ibero-American study.在阿根廷、巴西、秘鲁、墨西哥和西班牙,COVID-19 大流行期间成年人自述焦虑的患病率及其相关因素:一项伊比利亚-美洲的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 2;18(3):e0280528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280528. eCollection 2023.
8
The Increased Alcohol and Marijuana Use Associated with the Quality of Life and Psychosocial Aspects: a Study During the Covid-19 Pandemic in a Brazilian University Community.酒精和大麻使用增加与生活质量及心理社会因素的关联:巴西大学社区新冠疫情期间的一项研究
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022 Oct 21:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s11469-022-00937-4.
9
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Brazil.**标题**:COVID-19 大流行对巴西人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的影响 **摘要**:目的:描述巴西在 COVID-19 大流行期间人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的趋势,并评估其与大流行的公共卫生措施之间的关系。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2019 年至 2021 年巴西所有年龄组的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种数据。使用广义估计方程评估了疫苗接种覆盖率与大流行公共卫生措施之间的关系。结果:在研究期间,人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种覆盖率从 2019 年的 62.4%下降至 2021 年的 50.7%。在 10-14 岁年龄组中,疫苗接种覆盖率下降了 34.3%,而在 15-19 岁年龄组中下降了 16.1%。在 2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 3 月期间,随着公共卫生措施的加强,疫苗接种覆盖率下降的速度更快。结论:COVID-19 大流行对巴西的人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种产生了负面影响,需要采取措施加强疫苗接种计划,以确保疫苗的充分覆盖率。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;67:1604224. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604224. eCollection 2022.
10
Number of doses of Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine applied in Brazil before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.巴西在 COVID-19 大流行前后应用麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹疫苗的剂量数。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 9;21(1):1237. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06927-6.