Stanciu Diana
Romanian Young Academy, University of Bucharest, 050663 Bucharest, Romania.
Gerda Henkel Senior Research Fellow, Berlin Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Jan 11;23(1):97. doi: 10.3390/e23010097.
I will argue that, in an interdisciplinary study of consciousness, epistemic structural realism (ESR) can offer a feasible philosophical background for the study of consciousness and its associated neurophysiological phenomena in neuroscience and cognitive science while also taking into account the mathematical structures involved in this type of research. Applying the ESR principles also to the study of the neurophysiological phenomena associated with free will (or rather conscious free choice) and with various alterations of consciousness (AOCs) generated by various pathologies such as epilepsy would add explanatory value to the matter. This interdisciplinary approach would be in tune with Quine's well known idea that philosophy is not simple conceptual analysis but is continuous with science and actually represents an abstract branch of the empirical research. The ESR could thus resonate with scientific models of consciousness such as the global neuronal workspace model (inspired by the global workspace theory-GWT) and the integrated information theory (IIT) model. While structural realism has already been employed in physics or biology, its application as a meta-theory contextualising and relating various scientific findings on consciousness is new indeed. Out of the two variants: ontic structural realism (OSR) and epistemic structural realism (ESR), the latter can be considered more suitable for the study of consciousness and its associated neurophysiological phenomena because it removes the pressure of the still unanswered 'What is consciousness?' ontological question and allows us to concentrate instead on the 'What can we know about consciousness?' epistemological question.
我将论证,在意识的跨学科研究中,认知结构实在论(ESR)可以为神经科学和认知科学中意识及其相关神经生理现象的研究提供一个可行的哲学背景,同时也考虑到这类研究中涉及的数学结构。将ESR原则应用于与自由意志(或者更确切地说是有意识的自由选择)以及由癫痫等各种病理产生的意识的各种改变(AOCs)相关的神经生理现象的研究,将为这一问题增添解释价值。这种跨学科方法将与奎因的著名观点相一致,即哲学不是简单的概念分析,而是与科学连续的,实际上代表了实证研究的一个抽象分支。因此,ESR可能与意识的科学模型产生共鸣,比如全局神经元工作空间模型(受全局工作空间理论——GWT启发)和整合信息理论(IIT)模型。虽然结构实在论已经在物理学或生物学中得到应用,但其作为一种将关于意识的各种科学发现进行情境化和关联的元理论的应用确实是新的。在本体结构实在论(OSR)和认知结构实在论(ESR)这两种变体中,后者可以被认为更适合于意识及其相关神经生理现象的研究,因为它消除了尚未得到解答的“意识是什么?”这一本体论问题的压力,使我们能够转而专注于“我们对意识能了解什么?”这一认识论问题。