Kawagoe Izumi, Hayashida Masakazu, Satoh Daizoh, Kochiyama Tsukasa, Fukuda Masataka, Kishii Jun
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;10(2):1985-1993. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1607. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Recently, robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is increasingly applied to lung or mediastinal tumor surgery. However, appropriate methods of postoperative analgesia for RATS have not been studied.
Patients who underwent RATS at a single university hospital between January, 2017 and March, 2018 were studied retrospectively. Patients were anesthetized with either general anesthesia alone or combined general and thoracic epidural anesthesia. Accordingly, postoperative analgesia was managed with either intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl or thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) with morphine and levobupivacaine. Patients were thus divided into 2 groups (PCA and TEA) according to methods of postoperative analgesia, and analgesic efficacies were compared between the groups with regard to pain scores evaluated on a 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, rescue analgesic requirements within 24 h, side effects of anesthesia and analgesia, including respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea, pruritus, and urinary retention, time to ambulation after surgery, and hospital stay after surgery.
Data from 107 patients (76 in Group PCA and 31 in Group TEA) were analyzed. NRS pain scores at 6, 18, and 48 h were significantly less or tended to be less in Group TEA than in Group PCA (1.8±2.0 vs. 2.6±1.8, P=0.045; 1.7±1.5 vs. 2.4±1.8, P=0.047; and 1.9±1.4 vs. 2.5±1.6, P=0.063, respectively). The number of patients who required rescue analgesics within 24 h was significantly less in Group TEA than in Group PCA [4/31 (12%) vs. 32/76 (42%), P=0.004]. The other parameters were not significantly different between the groups.
Compared with PCA, TEA provided better analgesia after RATS in terms of less pain scores, less rescue analgesic requirements, and similar side effect profiles. TEA with a hydrophilic opioid and local anesthetic seemed an appropriate method of postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing RATS.
近年来,机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)越来越多地应用于肺部或纵隔肿瘤手术。然而,RATS术后合适的镇痛方法尚未得到研究。
回顾性研究2017年1月至2018年3月期间在一家大学医院接受RATS手术的患者。患者采用单纯全身麻醉或全身麻醉联合胸段硬膜外麻醉。相应地,术后镇痛采用芬太尼静脉自控镇痛(PCA)或吗啡和左旋布比卡因胸段硬膜外镇痛(TEA)。根据术后镇痛方法将患者分为两组(PCA组和TEA组),比较两组术后0、3、6、12、18、24和48小时采用11点数字评分量表(NRS)评估的疼痛评分、24小时内的补救镇痛需求、麻醉和镇痛的副作用(包括呼吸抑制、低血压、恶心、瘙痒和尿潴留)、术后下床活动时间和术后住院时间。
分析了107例患者的数据(PCA组76例,TEA组31例)。TEA组术后6、18和48小时的NRS疼痛评分显著低于或趋于低于PCA组(分别为1.8±2.0对2.6±1.8,P = 0.045;1.7±1.5对2.4±1.8,P = 0.047;1.9±1.4对2.5±1.6,P = 0.063)。TEA组24小时内需要补救镇痛的患者数量显著少于PCA组[4/31(12%)对32/76(42%),P = 0.004]。两组的其他参数无显著差异。
与PCA相比,TEA在RATS术后提供了更好的镇痛效果,疼痛评分更低,补救镇痛需求更少,且副作用相似。亲水性阿片类药物和局麻药联合的TEA似乎是RATS患者术后合适的镇痛方法。