Li Yan, Dong Hongquan, Tan Shanbai, Qian Yanning, Jin Wenjie
Department of Anesthesiology, The first affiliated hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14362. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014362.
Appropriate postoperative pain management can improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer (EC).
To compare different combinations of anesthesia and analgesia techniques in patients with EC undergoing open thoracotomy.
This randomized, controlled, open-label trial enrolled 100 patients with EC (aged 40-65 years; American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] grade I/II) receiving elective surgery at Jiangsu Province Hospital (China) between July 2016 and December 2017. Patients were randomized to 4 groups (n = 25 per group): total intravenous general anesthesia plus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (TIVA/PCIA); TIVA plus patient-controlled epidural analgesia (TIVA/PCEA); thoracic epidural anesthesia with intravenous general anesthesia plus PCIA (TEA-IVA/PCIA); and TEA-IVA/PCEA (TEA-IVA plus PCEA). Primary outcomes were plasma cortisol level (measured at baseline, 2 h after skin incision, surgery completion, and 24 and 48 h post-surgery) and pain (assessed at 24, 48, and 72 hours post-surgery using a visual analog scale). Secondary outcomes included time to first flatus, hospital stay and treatment costs. Postoperative adverse events (AEs) were analyzed.
Baseline and operative characteristics were similar between the 4 groups. Plasma cortisol level increased (P <.05 vs baseline) earlier in the TIVA groups (2 h after skin incision) than in the TEA-IVA groups (24 h after surgery). At 48 hours after surgery, plasma cortisol had returned to baseline levels in the PCEA groups but not in the PCIA groups. VAS pain scores at rest and during coughing were lower in the PCEA groups than in the PCIA groups (P <.05). Compared with the PCIA groups, the PCEA groups had shorter time to first flatus and shorter hospital stay, while use of TEA-IVA lowered the costs of intraoperative anesthesia (P <.05). However, the PCEA groups had a higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus.
Thoracic epidural anesthesia/analgesia can reduce the stress response, improve postoperative recovery and reduce hospital stay and costs for patients with EC.
食管癌(EC)患者术后进行适当的疼痛管理可改善预后。
比较接受开胸手术的EC患者不同麻醉和镇痛技术组合的效果。
本随机、对照、开放标签试验纳入了2016年7月至2017年12月期间在江苏省医院(中国)接受择期手术的100例EC患者(年龄40 - 65岁;美国麻醉医师协会[ASA]分级I/II)。患者被随机分为4组(每组n = 25):全凭静脉全身麻醉加患者自控静脉镇痛(TIVA/PCIA);TIVA加患者自控硬膜外镇痛(TIVA/PCEA);胸段硬膜外麻醉联合静脉全身麻醉加PCIA(TEA-IVA/PCIA);以及TEA-IVA/PCEA(TEA-IVA加PCEA)。主要结局指标为血浆皮质醇水平(在基线、皮肤切开后2小时、手术结束时以及术后24和48小时测量)和疼痛(术后24、48和72小时使用视觉模拟量表评估)。次要结局指标包括首次排气时间、住院时间和治疗费用。分析术后不良事件(AE)。
4组患者的基线和手术特征相似。TIVA组(皮肤切开后2小时)血浆皮质醇水平升高(与基线相比P <.05)的时间早于TEA-IVA组(术后24小时)。术后48小时,PCEA组血浆皮质醇已恢复至基线水平,而PCIA组未恢复。PCEA组静息和咳嗽时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分低于PCIA组(P <.05)。与PCIA组相比,PCEA组首次排气时间和住院时间更短,而使用TEA-IVA降低了术中麻醉费用(P <.05)。然而,PCEA组恶心、呕吐和瘙痒的发生率更高。
胸段硬膜外麻醉/镇痛可减轻应激反应,改善EC患者术后恢复,缩短住院时间并降低费用。