Hartwig Timothy Bryan, Sanders Taren, Vasconcellos Diego, Noetel Michael, Parker Philip D, Lubans David Revalds, Andrade Susana, Ávila-García Manuel, Bartholomew John, Belton Sarahjane, Brooks Naomi E, Bugge Anna, Cavero-Redondo Iván, Christiansen Lars Breum, Cohen Kristen, Coppinger Tara, Dyrstad Sindre, Errisuriz Vanessa, Fairclough Stuart, Gorely Trish, Javier Huertas-Delgado Francisco, Issartel Johann, Kriemler Susi, Kvalø Silje Eikanger, Marques-Vidal Pedro, Martinez-Vizcaino Vicente, Møller Niels Christian, Moran Colin, Morris John, Nevill Mary, Ochoa-Avilés Angélica, O'Leary Mai, Peralta Louisa, Pfeiffer Karin A, Puder Jardena, Redondo-Tébar Andrés, Robbins Lorraine B, Sanchez-Lopez Mairena, Tarp Jakob, Taylor Sarah, Tercedor Pablo, Toftager Mette, Villa-González Emilio, Wedderkopp Niels, Weston Kathryn Louise, Yin Zenong, Zhixiong Zhou, Lonsdale Chris, Del Pozo Cruz Borja
School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, New South Wales, Australia
Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University Faculty of Health Sciences, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Jan 13. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102740.
To determine if subpopulations of students benefit equally from school-based physical activity interventions in terms of cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity. To examine if physical activity intensity mediates improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness.
Pooled analysis of individual participant data from controlled trials that assessed the impact of school-based physical activity interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness and device-measured physical activity.
Data for 6621 children and adolescents aged 4-18 years from 20 trials were included.
Peak oxygen consumption (VO mL/kg/min) and minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity.
Interventions modestly improved students' cardiorespiratory fitness by 0.47 mL/kg/min (95% CI 0.33 to 0.61), but the effects were not distributed equally across subpopulations. Girls and older students benefited less than boys and younger students, respectively. Students with lower levels of initial fitness, and those with higher levels of baseline physical activity benefitted more than those who were initially fitter and less active, respectively. Interventions had a modest positive effect on physical activity with approximately one additional minute per day of both moderate and vigorous physical activity. Changes in vigorous, but not moderate intensity, physical activity explained a small amount (~5%) of the intervention effect on cardiorespiratory fitness.
Future interventions should include targeted strategies to address the needs of girls and older students. Interventions may also be improved by promoting more vigorous intensity physical activity. Interventions could mitigate declining youth cardiorespiratory fitness, increase physical activity and promote cardiovascular health if they can be delivered equitably and their effects sustained at the population level.
确定学生亚群体在心肺适能和身体活动方面是否能从基于学校的身体活动干预中同等程度地受益。研究身体活动强度是否介导心肺适能的改善。
对来自对照试验的个体参与者数据进行汇总分析,这些试验评估了基于学校的身体活动干预对心肺适能和设备测量的身体活动的影响。
纳入了来自20项试验的6621名4至18岁儿童和青少年的数据。
峰值摄氧量(VO₂ mL/kg/min)以及中等强度和剧烈身体活动的分钟数。
干预措施使学生的心肺适能适度提高了0.47 mL/kg/min(95%置信区间为0.33至0.61),但各亚群体的效果分布并不均衡。女孩和年龄较大的学生分别比男孩和年龄较小的学生受益更少。初始适能水平较低的学生以及基线身体活动水平较高的学生,分别比初始适能较好和活动较少的学生受益更多。干预措施对身体活动有适度的积极影响,中等强度和剧烈身体活动每天大约增加一分钟。剧烈强度而非中等强度身体活动的变化解释了干预对心肺适能影响的一小部分(约5%)。
未来的干预措施应包括针对性策略,以满足女孩和年龄较大学生的需求。通过促进更剧烈强度的身体活动也可能改善干预措施。如果干预措施能够公平实施并在人群层面维持其效果,那么它们可以缓解青少年心肺适能下降的情况,增加身体活动并促进心血管健康。