Pritchard Jodie, Bartels Susan A, Collier Amanda
Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN.
Emergency Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, CAN.
Cureus. 2020 Nov 24;12(11):e11680. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11680.
Global Health (GH) electives offer unique learning opportunities; however, risks to trainees and host populations should be minimized through pre-departure training and post-elective debriefing. In a 2016 study, only three Canadian residency programs mandated such training, although specific data on Emergency Medicine (EM) programs is lacking. This study aimed to identify GH elective requirements and perceived training gaps among EM programs.
We conducted two email surveys (one each for EM program directors [PDs] and residents) regarding training requirements and perceived gaps for GH electives. We also contacted university postgraduate medical education (PGME) and GH offices, via their online publicized emails, to assess university-wide requirements and resources.
Nine PDs responded, with 78% reporting having residents participate in GH electives. Many PDs (67%) believed residents were moderately prepared for GH electives, while 33% felt they were unprepared to some degree. Forty seven out of an estimated 380 EM residents responded with 35% having completed a GH elective during residency. Of those, only one (6%) reported feeling very prepared, and 43% believed there was a need to improve trainings. Uncertainty around training requirements was reported, and residents identified challenges faced on electives, as well as priority topics for training. Responses from PGME and GH offices indicated that pre-departure training and post-elective debriefing were required or available at more universities than was indicated by the PD and resident respondents. However university requirements varied widely, with some exclusively requiring basic travel information and Health and Safety checklists or modules. The disparate responses indicate that residents and PDs may either be unaware of university requirements or not utilize available training resources for GH electives.
Although Canadian EM residents participate in GH electives, the majority of training programs do not require pre-departure training or post-elective debriefing. PDs and residents report varying levels of preparedness, and residents acknowledge a variety of challenges during GH electives. This information can be used to inform pre-departure training and post-elective debriefing and encourage EM residents to access available university-wide training.
全球健康(GH)选修课程提供了独特的学习机会;然而,应通过出发前培训和选修课后汇报将实习生和当地人群面临的风险降至最低。在2016年的一项研究中,只有三个加拿大住院医师培训项目规定了此类培训,不过缺乏急诊医学(EM)项目的具体数据。本研究旨在确定GH选修课程的要求以及EM项目中察觉到的培训差距。
我们针对GH选修课程的培训要求和察觉到的差距进行了两次电子邮件调查(分别针对EM项目主任[PDs]和住院医师)。我们还通过大学研究生医学教育(PGME)和GH办公室在线公布的电子邮件联系了他们,以评估全校范围的要求和资源。
9名PDs回复,78%报告有住院医师参加GH选修课程。许多PDs(67%)认为住院医师为GH选修课程做了适度准备,而33%觉得他们在某种程度上准备不足。在估计的380名EM住院医师中,有47人回复,其中35%在住院期间完成了GH选修课程。在这些人中,只有一人(6%)报告感觉准备得非常充分,43%认为有必要改进培训。报告了培训要求方面的不确定性,住院医师指出了选修课程中面临的挑战以及培训的优先主题。PGME和GH办公室的回复表明,要求进行出发前培训和选修课后汇报或提供此类服务的大学比PDs和住院医师受访者指出的更多。然而,大学要求差异很大,有些仅要求提供基本旅行信息以及健康与安全清单或模块。不同的回复表明,住院医师和PDs可能要么不知道大学要求,要么没有利用GH选修课程的现有培训资源。
尽管加拿大EM住院医师参加GH选修课程,但大多数培训项目不要求进行出发前培训或选修课后汇报。PDs和住院医师报告的准备程度各不相同,住院医师承认在GH选修课程期间面临各种挑战。这些信息可用于为出发前培训和选修课后汇报提供参考,并鼓励EM住院医师利用全校范围的现有培训。