Department of Neuroscience, Mercy Saint Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA
Stroke Unit, Neurology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Dec;13(12):1117-1123. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016930. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
First-pass effect (FPE), restoring complete or near complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2c-3) in a single pass, is an independent predictor for good functional outcomes in the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The economic implications of achieving FPE have not been assessed.
To assess the economic impact of achieving complete or near complete reperfusion after the first pass.
Post hoc analyses were conducted using ARISE II study data. The target population consisted of patients in whom mTICI 2c-3 was achieved, stratified into two groups: (1) mTICI 2c-3 achieved after the first pass (FPE group) or (2) after multiple passes (non-FPE group). Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource use were compared between groups. Costs from peer-reviewed literature were applied to assess cost consequences from the perspectives of the United States (USA), France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom (UK).
Among patients who achieved mTICI 2c-3 (n=172), FPE was achieved in 53% (n=91). A higher proportion of patients in the FPE group reached good functional outcomes (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 80.46% vs 61.04%, p<0.01). The patients in the FPE group had a shorter mean length of stay (6.10 vs 9.48 days, p<0.01) and required only a single stent retriever, whereas 35% of patients in the non-FPE group required at least one additional device. Driven by improvement in clinical outcomes, the FPE group had lower procedural/hospitalization-related (24-33% reduction) and annual care (11-27% reduction) costs across all countries.
FPE resulted in improved clinical outcomes, translating into lower healthcare resource use and lower estimated costs.
首次通过效应(FPE)可在单次通过时恢复完全或近乎完全再灌注(改良脑梗死溶栓(mTICI)2c-3),是急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗中良好功能结局的独立预测因素。尚未评估实现 FPE 的经济意义。
评估首次通过后实现完全或近乎完全再灌注的经济影响。
使用 ARISE II 研究数据进行事后分析。目标人群包括达到 mTICI 2c-3 的患者,分为两组:(1)首次通过后达到 mTICI 2c-3(FPE 组)或(2)多次通过后达到 mTICI 2c-3(非 FPE 组)。比较两组之间的基线特征、临床结局和医疗资源使用情况。从同行评议文献中应用成本来评估从美国(美国)、法国、德国、意大利、西班牙、瑞典和英国(英国)的角度来看成本后果。
在达到 mTICI 2c-3 的患者中(n=172),FPE 组占 53%(n=91)。FPE 组达到良好功能结局的患者比例更高(90 天改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-2 为 80.46%比 61.04%,p<0.01)。FPE 组的平均住院时间更短(6.10 天比 9.48 天,p<0.01),仅需使用单一支架回收器,而非 FPE 组中 35%的患者至少需要使用一种额外的器械。由于临床结局的改善,FPE 组在所有国家的手术/住院相关费用(降低 24-33%)和年度护理费用(降低 11-27%)均较低。
FPE 可改善临床结局,从而降低医疗资源使用和估计成本。