• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态风险结果量表(DROS)对预测轻度智力残疾或边缘智力功能(法医)患者再犯的预测价值

[The predictive value of the Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS) for predicting recidivism in (forensic) patients with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning].

作者信息

Delforterie M J, Hesper B L, Nijman H L I, Korzilius H P L M, Turhan A, Didden R

出版信息

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2020;62(12):1040-1048.

PMID:33443757
Abstract

The Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS) was developed to assess treatment progress of patients with mild intellectual disability (MID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) and severe behavioral and/or psychiatric problems. Because of the focus on dynamic risk factors, practitioners also see this instrument as a tool for risk assessment.
AIM: To investigate the predictive value of the DROS on different classifications and severities of recidivism.
METHOD: DROS data from the routine outcome monitoring (ROM) of 250 forensic patients with MID-BIF who were discharged between 2007 and end of 2014 were linked to recidivism data from the Judicial Information Service.
RESULTS: The DROS total score predicted general, violence and sexual recidivism better than chance (AUCs > 0.58), although the effect was small. A DROS-recidivism subscale predicted general, violence and other recidivism with a medium to large effect (AUCs > 0.67). The predictive values of the DROS total score and DROS-recidivism subscale were comparable to those of the Historic, Clinical, Future (in Dutch: HKT)-30.
CONCLUSION: The DROS total score and DROS-recidivism subscale predict different classifications of recidivism better than chance. However, for risk assessment the DROS appears to have no added value to the HKT-30.

摘要

动态风险结果量表(DROS)旨在评估轻度智力障碍(MID)或边缘智力功能(BIF)且伴有严重行为和/或精神问题患者的治疗进展。由于关注动态风险因素,从业者也将该工具视为一种风险评估工具。

目的

研究DROS对不同分类和严重程度再犯的预测价值。

方法

将2007年至2014年底出院的250名患有MID - BIF的法医患者的常规结果监测(ROM)中的DROS数据与司法信息服务处的再犯数据相关联。

结果

DROS总分对一般再犯、暴力再犯和性再犯的预测效果优于随机水平(曲线下面积>0.58),尽管效果较小。一个DROS - 再犯子量表对一般再犯、暴力再犯和其他再犯的预测效果为中等至较大(曲线下面积>0.67)。DROS总分和DROS - 再犯子量表的预测价值与历史、临床、未来(荷兰语:HKT)- 30相当。

结论

DROS总分和DROS - 再犯子量表对不同分类再犯的预测效果优于随机水平。然而,对于风险评估,DROS似乎对HKT - 30没有附加价值。

相似文献

1
[The predictive value of the Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS) for predicting recidivism in (forensic) patients with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning].动态风险结果量表(DROS)对预测轻度智力残疾或边缘智力功能(法医)患者再犯的预测价值
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2020;62(12):1040-1048.
2
The predictive value of the dynamic risk outcome scales (DROS) for recidivism in (forensic) clients with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning.动态风险结局量表(DROS)对轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能的(法医)来访者累犯的预测价值。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jul;36(4):750-757. doi: 10.1111/jar.13090. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
3
Psychometric properties of the Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS) for individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning and externalizing behaviour problems.动态风险结果量表(DROS)在轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能以及外化行为问题个体中的心理测量学特性。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jul;33(4):662-672. doi: 10.1111/jar.12546. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
4
Violent Recidivism and Adverse Childhood Experiences in Forensic Psychiatric Patients With Impaired Intellectual Functioning.暴力再犯与智力障碍法医精神病患者的不良童年经历。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2024 Oct;68(13-14):1357-1379. doi: 10.1177/0306624X221133013. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
5
Reliability and validity of the dynamic risk outcome scales-short version for clients with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning.动态风险结果量表-简表在轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能障碍患者中的信度和效度。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2024 May;37(3):e13212. doi: 10.1111/jar.13212.
6
[Recognizing borderline intellectual functioning or mild intellectual disability in newly registered patients in a general psychiatric outpatient clinic].[识别普通精神科门诊新登记患者中的边缘智力功能或轻度智力残疾]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2020;62(10):860-867.
7
[The predictive value of mild intellectual disability/ borderline intellectual functioning and ptsd for treatment results in severely mentally Ill patients].[轻度智力残疾/边缘智力功能及创伤后应激障碍对重症精神病患者治疗结果的预测价值]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2020;62(10):868-877.
8
Inpatient violence in forensic psychiatry: Does change in dynamic risk indicators of the IFTE help predict short term inpatient violence?法医精神病学中的住院患者暴力:国际暴力风险评估工具的动态风险指标变化是否有助于预测短期住院患者暴力?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101448. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
9
Victimization history in female forensic psychiatric patients with intellectual disabilities: Results from a Dutch multicenter comparative study.女性法医精神病学智力障碍患者的受害史:来自荷兰多中心比较研究的结果。
Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Mar;122:104179. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104179. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
10
The predictive validity of common risk assessment tools in men with intellectual disabilities and problematic sexual behaviors.常见风险评估工具对患有智力障碍及性行为问题男性的预测效度。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Oct;57:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Violence risk assessment instruments in forensic psychiatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.法医精神科人群的暴力风险评估工具:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2023 Oct;10(10):780-789. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00256-0.