Suppr超能文献

动态风险结果量表(DROS)对预测轻度智力残疾或边缘智力功能(法医)患者再犯的预测价值

[The predictive value of the Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS) for predicting recidivism in (forensic) patients with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning].

作者信息

Delforterie M J, Hesper B L, Nijman H L I, Korzilius H P L M, Turhan A, Didden R

出版信息

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2020;62(12):1040-1048.

Abstract

The Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS) was developed to assess treatment progress of patients with mild intellectual disability (MID) or borderline intellectual functioning (BIF) and severe behavioral and/or psychiatric problems. Because of the focus on dynamic risk factors, practitioners also see this instrument as a tool for risk assessment.
AIM: To investigate the predictive value of the DROS on different classifications and severities of recidivism.
METHOD: DROS data from the routine outcome monitoring (ROM) of 250 forensic patients with MID-BIF who were discharged between 2007 and end of 2014 were linked to recidivism data from the Judicial Information Service.
RESULTS: The DROS total score predicted general, violence and sexual recidivism better than chance (AUCs > 0.58), although the effect was small. A DROS-recidivism subscale predicted general, violence and other recidivism with a medium to large effect (AUCs > 0.67). The predictive values of the DROS total score and DROS-recidivism subscale were comparable to those of the Historic, Clinical, Future (in Dutch: HKT)-30.
CONCLUSION: The DROS total score and DROS-recidivism subscale predict different classifications of recidivism better than chance. However, for risk assessment the DROS appears to have no added value to the HKT-30.

摘要

动态风险结果量表(DROS)旨在评估轻度智力障碍(MID)或边缘智力功能(BIF)且伴有严重行为和/或精神问题患者的治疗进展。由于关注动态风险因素,从业者也将该工具视为一种风险评估工具。

目的

研究DROS对不同分类和严重程度再犯的预测价值。

方法

将2007年至2014年底出院的250名患有MID - BIF的法医患者的常规结果监测(ROM)中的DROS数据与司法信息服务处的再犯数据相关联。

结果

DROS总分对一般再犯、暴力再犯和性再犯的预测效果优于随机水平(曲线下面积>0.58),尽管效果较小。一个DROS - 再犯子量表对一般再犯、暴力再犯和其他再犯的预测效果为中等至较大(曲线下面积>0.67)。DROS总分和DROS - 再犯子量表的预测价值与历史、临床、未来(荷兰语:HKT)- 30相当。

结论

DROS总分和DROS - 再犯子量表对不同分类再犯的预测效果优于随机水平。然而,对于风险评估,DROS似乎对HKT - 30没有附加价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验