• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态风险结果量表(DROS)在轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能以及外化行为问题个体中的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric properties of the Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS) for individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning and externalizing behaviour problems.

机构信息

Trajectum, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jul;33(4):662-672. doi: 10.1111/jar.12546. Epub 2018 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1111/jar.12546
PMID:30460720
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study examined the psychometric properties of the Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS), an instrument developed to measure dynamic risk factors in individuals with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning (MID-BIF) and externalizing (including offending-like) behaviour problems.

METHOD

The sample consisted of 606 clients (86% male) from inpatient treatment wards at a facility for individuals with MID-BIF and externalizing behaviour problems.

RESULTS

The DROS showed an acceptable factor structure, good internal consistency, significant test-retest reliability and fair to excellent inter-rater reliabilities for most subscales and total score. Compared to the Adult Behavior Checklist (ABCL; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2003 Manual for the ASEBA adult forms and profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families), the DROS showed convergent and divergent validity, concurrent and longitudinal validity.

CONCLUSIONS

The DROS is a reliable and valid instrument to measure dynamic risk factors in clients with MID-BIF. Future research on the DROS will focus on the assessment of recidivism and the inclusion of internalizing problems.

摘要

背景

本研究检验了动态风险结果量表(DROS)的心理测量特性,该量表旨在测量轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能(MID-BIF)和外化(包括类似犯罪)行为问题个体的动态风险因素。

方法

样本包括 606 名(86%为男性)来自 MID-BIF 和外化行为问题治疗机构住院病房的患者。

结果

DROS 表现出可接受的因子结构、良好的内部一致性、大多数分量表和总分的显著重测信度以及良好到优秀的评分者间信度。与成人行为检查表(ABCL;Achenbach & Rescorla,2003 ASEBA 成人形式和简介手册。伯灵顿,VT:佛蒙特大学儿童、青年和家庭研究中心)相比,DROS 显示出收敛和发散效度、同时和纵向效度。

结论

DROS 是一种可靠且有效的工具,可测量 MID-BIF 患者的动态风险因素。未来对 DROS 的研究将集中在累犯评估和内化问题的纳入上。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS) for individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning and externalizing behaviour problems.动态风险结果量表(DROS)在轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能以及外化行为问题个体中的心理测量学特性。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jul;33(4):662-672. doi: 10.1111/jar.12546. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
2
Reliability and validity of the dynamic risk outcome scales-short version for clients with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning.动态风险结果量表-简表在轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能障碍患者中的信度和效度。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2024 May;37(3):e13212. doi: 10.1111/jar.13212.
3
[The predictive value of the Dynamic Risk Outcome Scales (DROS) for predicting recidivism in (forensic) patients with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning].动态风险结果量表(DROS)对预测轻度智力残疾或边缘智力功能(法医)患者再犯的预测价值
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2020;62(12):1040-1048.
4
The predictive value of the dynamic risk outcome scales (DROS) for recidivism in (forensic) clients with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning.动态风险结局量表(DROS)对轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能的(法医)来访者累犯的预测价值。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jul;36(4):750-757. doi: 10.1111/jar.13090. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
5
Development and psychometric assessment of a psychological well-being instrument for adults with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning.发展和心理测量评估轻度智力障碍或边缘智力成年人的心理健康工具。
Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Feb;121:104151. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104151. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
6
Concurrence of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and developmental behaviour checklist among children with an intellectual disability.智力障碍儿童的长处和困难问卷与发展行为检查表的一致性。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Feb;62(2):150-155. doi: 10.1111/jir.12426. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
7
Utility of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) in psychiatric outpatients with intellectual disabilities.简明症状量表(BSI)在精神科智力障碍门诊患者中的应用。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Sep;56(9):843-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01440.x. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
8
Development and psychometric properties of the Clinical Anxiety Scale for People with Intellectual Disabilities (ClASP-ID).《智障人士临床焦虑量表(ClASP-ID)的编制及心理测量学特性》。
J Neurodev Disord. 2024 Jul 27;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s11689-024-09554-9.
9
Behaviour problems in people with intellectual disabilities: validation of the French version of the Behaviour Problems Inventory - Short Form.智障人士的行为问题:《行为问题清单-短式》法语版的验证。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 May;63(5):466-476. doi: 10.1111/jir.12612. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
10
The Behaviour Problems Inventory-Short Form: Reliability and Factorial Validity in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities.《行为问题量表简版:智障成年人的信度和因子效度》
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2015 Nov;28(6):561-71. doi: 10.1111/jar.12152. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Group climate, aggressive incidents and coercion in a secure forensic setting for individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning: A multilevel study.群体氛围、攻击事件与轻度智力障碍或边缘智力个体在安全司法环境中的强制:一项多层次研究
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Jul;34(4):1026-1036. doi: 10.1111/jar.12841. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
2
Flexible assertive community treatment for individuals with a mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning: results of a longitudinal study in the Netherlands.对轻度智力障碍或边缘智力功能个体实施灵活坚定的社区治疗:荷兰一项纵向研究的结果。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 Aug;63(8):1015-1022. doi: 10.1111/jir.12619. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
3
Psychometric properties of the Group Climate Instrument (GCI) in individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning.群体氛围量表(GCI)在轻度智力障碍或边缘智力人群中的心理测量学特性。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019 Mar;63(3):215-224. doi: 10.1111/jir.12567. Epub 2018 Nov 19.