Department of Radiological Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2020 May 6;6(4):045002. doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab8b7e.
Although the luminescence of water at lower energy than the Cerenkov-light threshold during carbon-ion irradiation was found and imaging was possible, the temporal response has not been measured, and so the difference from Cerenkov-light remains unclear. To clarify this point, we measured the temporal response of the luminescence of water at lower energy than the Cerenkov-light threshold and compared it with that of Cerenkov-light. We used silicon photomultiplier (Si-PM) modules to measure the temporal response at the Bragg peak area of a water phantom during irradiation of the carbon ion where the Cerenkov-light was not included. We also measured the temporal response at the shallow depth of the water phantom where the Cerenkov-light was included. In both areas, we measured the temporal waveforms of the light produced by the irradiation of the carbon ions in which the ripples of spills were clearly observed. We found no difference in the waveforms between the Bragg peak and the shallow depths of water. Our results do not contradict the hypothesis that the luminescence of water and Cerenkov-light are produced by the same mechanism.
尽管在碳离子辐照时发现了低于切伦科夫光阈值的水的发光现象,并可以进行成像,但尚未测量其时间响应,因此其与切伦科夫光的区别尚不清楚。为了阐明这一点,我们测量了低于切伦科夫光阈值的水的发光的时间响应,并将其与切伦科夫光进行了比较。我们使用硅光电倍增管(Si-PM)模块测量了水模体在 Bragg 峰区域的时间响应,该区域在碳离子辐照时不包括切伦科夫光。我们还测量了包含切伦科夫光的水模体浅深度处的时间响应。在这两个区域,我们都测量了由碳离子辐照产生的光的时间波形,其中可以清楚地观察到溢出的波纹。我们发现 Bragg 峰和水的浅深度处的波形没有差异。我们的结果并不与水的发光和切伦科夫光由相同机制产生的假设相矛盾。