Université de Paris, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France.
Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM UMR1138, Paris, France.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0245439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245439. eCollection 2021.
Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE) evaluate clinical reasoning, communication skills, and interpersonal behavior during medical education. In France, clinical training has long relied on bedside clinical practice in academic hospitals. The need for a simulated teaching environment has recently emerged, due to the increasing number of students admitted to medical schools, and the necessity of objectively evaluating practical skills. This study aimed at investigating the relationships between OSCE grades and current evaluation modalities.
Three-hundred seventy-nine 4th-year students of University-of-Paris Medical School participated to the first large-scale OSCE at this institution, consisting in three OSCE stations (OSCE#1-3). OSCE#1 and #2 focused on cardiovascular clinical skills and competence, whereas OSCE#3 focused on relational skills while providing explanations before planned cholecystectomy. We investigated correlations of OSCE grades with multiple choice (MCQ)-based written examinations and evaluations of clinical skills and behavior (during hospital traineeships); OSCE grade distribution; and the impact of integrating OSCE grades into the current evaluation in terms of student ranking.
The competence-oriented OSCE#1 and OSCE#2 grades correlated only with MCQ grades (r = 0.19, P<0.001) or traineeship skill grades (r = 0.17, P = 0.001), respectively, and not with traineeship behavior grades (P>0.75). Conversely, the behavior-oriented OSCE#3 grades correlated with traineeship skill and behavior grades (r = 0.19, P<0.001, and r = 0.12, P = 0.032), but not with MCQ grades (P = 0.09). The dispersion of OSCE grades was wider than for MCQ examinations (P<0.001). When OSCE grades were integrated to the final fourth-year grade with an incremental 10%, 20% or 40% coefficient, an increasing proportion of the 379 students had a ranking variation by ±50 ranks (P<0.001). This ranking change mainly affected students among the mid-50% of ranking.
This large-scale French experience showed that OSCE designed to assess a combination of clinical competence and behavioral skills, increases the discriminatory capacity of current evaluations modalities in French medical schools.
客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)在医学教育中评估临床推理、沟通技巧和人际交往行为。在法国,临床培训长期以来一直依赖于学术医院的床边临床实践。由于医学院学生人数的增加,以及客观评估实践技能的必要性,最近出现了对模拟教学环境的需求。本研究旨在调查 OSCE 成绩与当前评估方式之间的关系。
巴黎大学医学院的 379 名四年级学生参加了该机构的第一次大规模 OSCE,包括三个 OSCE 站(OSCE#1-3)。OSCE#1 和#2 侧重于心血管临床技能和能力,而 OSCE#3 侧重于提供计划胆囊切除术前解释时的关系技能。我们调查了 OSCE 成绩与多项选择题(MCQ)基础书面考试和临床技能和行为评估(在住院实习期间)之间的相关性;OSCE 成绩分布;以及将 OSCE 成绩纳入当前评估对学生排名的影响。
面向能力的 OSCE#1 和 OSCE#2 成绩仅与 MCQ 成绩(r = 0.19,P<0.001)或实习技能成绩(r = 0.17,P = 0.001)相关,而与实习行为成绩无关(P>0.75)。相反,面向行为的 OSCE#3 成绩与实习技能和行为成绩相关(r = 0.19,P<0.001,r = 0.12,P = 0.032),但与 MCQ 成绩无关(P = 0.09)。OSCE 成绩的分散度大于 MCQ 考试(P<0.001)。当 OSCE 成绩以递增 10%、20%或 40%的系数纳入最终四年级成绩时,379 名学生中有越来越多的学生排名变化超过±50 位(P<0.001)。这种排名变化主要影响排名在中间 50%的学生。
这项大型法国经验表明,旨在评估临床能力和行为技能相结合的 OSCE 提高了法国医学院当前评估方式的区分能力。