Suppr超能文献

青少年边缘型人格障碍(BPD)或 BPD 特征的心理治疗 - 随机临床试验的系统评价与荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。

Psychological therapies for adolescents with borderline personality disorder (BPD) or BPD features-A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.

机构信息

Psychiatric Research Unit, Region Zealand, Denmark.

Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Department, Region Zealand, Denmark.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0245331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245331. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To review the effectiveness of psychological therapies for adolescents with borderline personality disorder (BPD) or BPD features.

METHODS

We included randomized clinical trials on psychological therapies for adolescents with BPD and BPD features. Data were extracted and assessed for quality according to Cochrane guidelines, and summarized as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous data and as Odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous data. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool for each domain. When possible, we pooled trials into meta-analyses, and used Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) to control for random errors. Quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

10 trials on adolescents with BPD or BPD features were included. All trials were considered at high risk of bias, and the quality of the evidence was rated as "very low". We did TSA on the primary outcome and found that the required information size was reached. The risk of random error was thus discarded.

CONCLUSION

Only 10 trials have been conducted on adolescents with BPD or BPD features. Of these only few showed superior outcomes of the experimental intervention compared to the control intervention. No adverse effects of the interventions were mentioned. Attrition rates varied from 15-75% in experimental interventions. The overall quality was very low due to high risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency, which limits the confidence in effect estimates. Due to the high risk of bias, high attrition rates and underpowered studies in this area, it is difficult to derive any conclusions on the efficacy of psychological therapies for BPD in adolescence. There is a need for more high quality trials with larger samples to identify effective psychological therapies for this specific age group with BPD or BPD features.

摘要

目的

综述心理疗法治疗边缘型人格障碍(BPD)或 BPD 特征青少年的疗效。

方法

我们纳入了针对 BPD 和 BPD 特征青少年的心理疗法的随机临床试验。根据 Cochrane 指南提取和评估数据质量,并对连续数据汇总为均数差(MD)及其 95%置信区间(CI),对二分类数据汇总为比值比(OR)及其 95%CI。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估各领域的偏倚风险。如有可能,我们将试验进行合并分析,并使用试验序贯分析(TSA)控制随机误差。使用推荐、评估、制定和评价(GRADE)评估证据质量。

结果

纳入了 10 项针对 BPD 或 BPD 特征青少年的试验。所有试验均被认为存在高偏倚风险,证据质量被评为“极低”。我们对主要结局进行了 TSA,发现已达到所需信息量,从而排除了随机误差的风险。

结论

仅有 10 项针对 BPD 或 BPD 特征青少年的试验。其中只有少数试验显示实验干预的结局优于对照干预。干预措施无不良影响。实验干预的脱落率在 15-75%之间。由于存在高偏倚风险、不精确和不一致性,整体质量非常低,限制了对效应估计的信心。由于该领域存在高偏倚风险、高脱落率和研究效能低,难以得出关于心理疗法治疗青少年 BPD 的疗效的任何结论。需要更多高质量、大样本的试验来确定针对 BPD 或 BPD 特征的特定年龄组的有效心理疗法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e891/7808579/a4501048d83c/pone.0245331.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验