Department of Psychology, Trinity University, San Antonio, Texas.
Department of Psychology, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, Michigan.
J Pers Disord. 2023 Feb;37(1):1-15. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2023.37.1.1.
Experts in personality disorders (PDs) generally prefer dimensional diagnostic systems to categorical ones, but less is known about experts' attitudes toward personality pathology diagnoses in adolescents, and little is known about public health shortfalls and advocacy needs and how these might differ geographically. To fill these gaps, the International Society for the Study of Personality Disorders surveyed 248 professionals with interests in PDs about their attitudes toward different diagnostic systems for adults and adolescents, their PD-related clinical practices, and perceived advocacy needs in their area. Results suggested that dimensional diagnostic systems are preferable to categorical and that skepticism about personality pathology in adolescents may not be warranted. The most pressing advocacy need was the increased availability of PD-related services, but many other needs were identified. Results provide a blueprint for advocacy and suggest ways that professional societies can collaborate with public health bodies to expand the reach of PD expertise and services.
人格障碍(PD)专家通常更喜欢维度诊断系统而不是类别诊断系统,但对于专家对青少年人格病理诊断的态度知之甚少,也不太了解公共卫生的不足以及宣传的需求,以及这些需求在地理上可能存在哪些差异。为了填补这些空白,国际人格障碍研究学会对 248 名对 PD 感兴趣的专业人士进行了调查,内容涉及他们对成人和青少年不同诊断系统的态度、与 PD 相关的临床实践以及他们所在地区的宣传需求。结果表明,维度诊断系统优于类别诊断系统,而且对青少年人格病理的怀疑可能没有依据。最紧迫的宣传需求是增加 PD 相关服务的提供,但还确定了许多其他需求。研究结果为宣传提供了蓝图,并提出了专业学会可以与公共卫生机构合作的方式,以扩大 PD 专业知识和服务的覆盖范围。