• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对印尼版电子健康素养量表进行有效性和可靠性测试。

Validity and reliability testing of the Indonesian version of the eHealth Literacy Scale during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.

出版信息

Health Informatics J. 2021 Jan-Mar;27(1):1460458220975466. doi: 10.1177/1460458220975466.

DOI:10.1177/1460458220975466
PMID:33446030
Abstract

Nowadays, it is common for people to look for health care information on the internet. The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) is commonly used to measure eHealth literacy. As of the publication of this study, the Indonesian version for eHEALS has not been published even though eHealth literacy is necessary, especially in the current COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of eHEALS (I-eHEALS). A total of 100 respondents in East Java were involved in this cross-sectional study. Pearson-product moment correlation method and construct validity were used to validate the results. The reliability was determined based on the Cronbach's alpha internal consistency measurement and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Pearson correlation analysis results are significantly higher ( > 0.254,  < 0.01) compared to the critical value table. Single factors accounting for 57.66% variance in the scales exhibit a unidimensional latent structure. The internal consistency between items is excellent as shown by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.91). The ICC analysis shows an acceptable result (0.552,  < 0.01). The I-eHEALS is valid and reliable to be used for evaluating the eHealth literacy of the Indonesian population.

摘要

如今,人们在互联网上查找医疗保健信息是很常见的。电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)常用于衡量电子健康素养。截至本研究发表之时,即使电子健康素养是必要的,特别是在当前 COVID-19 大流行期间,印度尼西亚版的 eHEALS 尚未发布。我们旨在评估电子健康素养量表印度尼西亚版(I-eHEALS)的有效性和可靠性。这项横断面研究共纳入东爪哇的 100 名受访者。采用皮尔逊积矩相关法和结构效度来验证结果。根据克朗巴赫的α内部一致性测量和组内相关系数(ICC)来确定可靠性。皮尔逊相关分析结果明显较高(>0.254,<0.01),与临界值表相比。占量表方差 57.66%的单一因素表现出单一的潜在结构。项目之间的内部一致性极好,克朗巴赫的α系数为 0.91。ICC 分析显示出可接受的结果(0.552,<0.01)。I-eHEALS 是有效且可靠的,可以用于评估印度尼西亚人口的电子健康素养。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability testing of the Indonesian version of the eHealth Literacy Scale during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对印尼版电子健康素养量表进行有效性和可靠性测试。
Health Informatics J. 2021 Jan-Mar;27(1):1460458220975466. doi: 10.1177/1460458220975466.
2
The Korean eHealth Literacy Scale (K-eHEALS): Reliability and Validity Testing in Younger Adults Recruited Online.韩国电子健康素养量表(K-eHEALS):对在线招募的年轻人进行的信效度测试
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 20;20(4):e138. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8759.
3
Health Literacy, eHealth Literacy, Adherence to Infection Prevention and Control Procedures, Lifestyle Changes, and Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms Among Health Care Workers During Lockdown: Online Survey.封锁期间医护人员的健康素养、电子健康素养、对感染预防与控制程序的依从性、生活方式改变及疑似新冠症状:在线调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 12;22(11):e22894. doi: 10.2196/22894.
4
Correlation Between eHealth Literacy and Health Literacy Using the eHealth Literacy Scale and Real-Life Experiences in the Health Sector as a Proxy Measure of Functional Health Literacy: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey.使用电子健康素养量表及卫生部门的实际生活经历作为功能性健康素养的替代指标,探讨电子健康素养与健康素养之间的相关性:基于网络的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 31;20(10):e281. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9401.
5
Testing reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the eHealth literacy scale (eHEALS) among medical students in Vietnam.测试越南版电子健康素养量表 (eHEALS) 在越南医学生中的信度和效度。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104962. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104962. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
6
eHealth literacy in chronic disease patients: An item response theory analysis of the eHealth literacy scale (eHEALS).慢性病患者的电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)的项目反应理论分析
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):320-326. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Norwegian Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale (eHEALS) Among Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Cross-Sectional Validation Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者中挪威版电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)的心理测量学特性:横断面验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 28;22(7):e17312. doi: 10.2196/17312.
8
Reliability and Validity of the Telephone-Based eHealth Literacy Scale Among Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Survey.老年人基于电话的电子健康素养量表的信效度:横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 26;19(10):e362. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8481.
9
Psychometric Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Simplified Chinese eHealth Literacy Scale: Cross-Sectional Study.《简化版电子健康素养量表的心理测量学验证和文化适应性:横断面研究》
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 7;22(12):e18613. doi: 10.2196/18613.
10
Psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the eHealth Literacy Scale.匈牙利语版电子健康素养量表的心理测量学特性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(Suppl 1):57-69. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01062-1. Epub 2019 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
eHealth Literacy Assessment Instruments: Scoping Review.电子健康素养评估工具:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 20;27:e66965. doi: 10.2196/66965.
2
Validity and reliability of the Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (ADQ) in Indonesian health students.印度尼西亚健康专业学生中痴呆症问卷调查方法(ADQ)的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 29;25(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07332-2.
3
Psychometric Analysis of the eHealth Literacy Scale in Portuguese Older Adults (eHEALS-PT24): Instrument Development and Validation.
葡萄牙老年人电子健康素养量表(eHEALS-PT24)的心理测量分析:工具开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 26;27:e57730. doi: 10.2196/57730.
4
Health and eHealth Literacy of Patients With Diabetes in Low-Income Countries: Perspective From Guinea and Burkina Faso.低收入国家糖尿病患者的健康与电子健康素养:来自几内亚和布基纳法索的视角
JMIR Diabetes. 2024 Dec 3;9:e55677. doi: 10.2196/55677.
5
Assessing Electronic Health Literacy in Individuals With the Post-COVID-19 Condition Using the German Revised eHealth Literacy Scale: Validation Study.使用德国修订的电子健康素养量表评估新冠后状况个体的电子健康素养:验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Apr 25;8:e52189. doi: 10.2196/52189.
6
eHealth literacy of migrant domestic workers in Hong Kong in the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study.香港新冠疫情期间移民家庭佣工的电子健康素养:混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0296893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296893. eCollection 2024.
7
eHealth literacy of patients attending a primary care clinic in Malaysia and its associated factors: A cross-sectional study.马来西亚一家初级保健诊所患者的电子健康素养及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Digit Health. 2022 Nov 17;8:20552076221135392. doi: 10.1177/20552076221135392. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
8
Development and psychometric evaluation of a new brief scale to measure eHealth literacy in people with type 2 diabetes.一种用于测量2型糖尿病患者电子健康素养的新型简短量表的开发与心理测量学评估。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Nov 4;21(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01062-2.
9
Impact of health literacy on anxiety and depressive symptoms in pregnant women in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间日本孕妇的健康素养对焦虑和抑郁症状的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 18;12(1):14042. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18405-3.
10
Measuring health literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of instruments from 1993 to 2021.测量健康素养:1993 年至 2021 年工具的系统评价和文献计量分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 15;17(7):e0271524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271524. eCollection 2022.