Suppr超能文献

从诱导的血期间日疟原虫感染的受试者中采集和浓缩寄生虫的血浆分离术的安全性和可行性。

Safety and feasibility of apheresis to harvest and concentrate parasites from subjects with induced blood stage Plasmodium vivax infection.

机构信息

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston Road, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

出版信息

Malar J. 2021 Jan 14;20(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03581-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the absence of a method to culture Plasmodium vivax, the only way to source parasites is ex vivo. This hampers many aspects of P. vivax research. This study aimed to assess the safety of apheresis, a method for selective removal of specific components of blood as a means of extracting and concentrating P. vivax parasites.

METHODS

An iterative approach was employed across four non-immune healthy human subjects in single subject cohorts. All four subjects were inoculated with ~ 564 blood stage P. vivax (HMP013-Pv) and subjected to apheresis 10 to 11 days later. Blood samples collected during apheresis (haematocrit layers 0.5% to 11%) were tested for the presence and concentration of P. vivax by microscopy, flow cytometry, 18S rDNA qPCR for total parasites, and pvs25 qRT-PCR for female gametocyte transcripts. Safety was determined by monitoring adverse events. Malaria transmission to mosquitoes was assessed by membrane feeding assays.

RESULTS

There were no serious adverse events and no significant safety concerns. Apheresis concentrated asexual parasites by up to 4.9-fold (range: 0.9-4.9-fold) and gametocytes by up to 1.45-fold (range: 0.38-1.45-fold) compared to pre-apheresis densities. No single haematocrit layer contained > 40% of all the recovered P. vivax asexual parasites. Ex vivo concentration of parasites by Percoll gradient centrifugation of whole blood achieved greater concentration of gametocytes than apheresis. Mosquito transmission was enhanced by up to fivefold in a single apheresis sample compared to pre-apheresis.

CONCLUSION

The modest level of parasite concentration suggests that the use of apheresis may not be an ideal method for harvesting P. vivax. Trial Registration Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) Trial ID: ACTRN12617001502325 registered on 19th October 2017. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373812.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏培养间日疟原虫的方法,唯一的寄生虫来源是体外。这阻碍了间日疟原虫研究的许多方面。本研究旨在评估一种选择性去除血液特定成分的方法——血液成分分离术(apheresis)的安全性,该方法用于提取和浓缩间日疟原虫寄生虫。

方法

在 4 名非免疫健康人类个体的单个个体队列中,采用迭代方法。所有 4 名受试者均接种约 564 个间日疟原虫血期(HMP013-Pv),10-11 天后进行血液成分分离术。通过显微镜检查、流式细胞术、18S rDNA qPCR 检测总寄生虫和 pvs25 qRT-PCR 检测雌性配子体转录本,检测血液成分分离术中采集的血液样本中是否存在和浓缩间日疟原虫。通过监测不良事件来确定安全性。通过膜喂养试验评估疟原虫向蚊子的传播。

结果

没有严重的不良事件,也没有明显的安全问题。与分离前密度相比,血液成分分离术可将无性寄生虫浓缩多达 4.9 倍(范围:0.9-4.9 倍),将配子体浓缩多达 1.45 倍(范围:0.38-1.45 倍)。没有单个血细胞层包含超过 40%的所有回收的间日疟原虫无性寄生虫。与血液成分分离术相比,通过 Percoll 梯度离心法对全血进行寄生虫体外浓缩可获得更高浓度的配子体。与分离前相比,在单个血液成分分离术样本中,蚊子传播增强了多达 5 倍。

结论

寄生虫浓缩程度适中,表明血液成分分离术可能不是收获间日疟原虫的理想方法。

试验注册

澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)试验 ID:ACTRN12617001502325,于 2017 年 10 月 19 日注册。https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373812。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9202/7809875/be69e1f2f8bb/12936_2021_3581_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验