• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理人员开处方的早期采用者:一项定性研究。

Early adopters of paramedic prescribing: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Stenner Karen, van Even Suzanne, Collen Andy

机构信息

University of Surrey.

College of Paramedics.

出版信息

Br Paramed J. 2019 Dec 1;4(3):57. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2019.12.4.3.57.

DOI:10.29045/14784726.2019.12.4.3.57
PMID:33447155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7783914/
Abstract

AIMS

To explore the experience of paramedics who are early adopters of independent prescribing in a range of healthcare settings in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

Following a public consultation by NHS England in 2015, the decision was made in March 2018 to amend legislation to enable advanced paramedics to independently prescribe medicine in UK settings. Capturing the experience of these 'early adopters' will help to identify where paramedic prescribing can produce optimum benefits in healthcare systems, as well as enabling early scoping out of challenges to implementation and strategies for resolving challenges. This exploratory qualitative study involved interviews with 17 paramedics who have undertaken the independent prescribing programme in the United Kingdom. Participants were recruited via social media and regional paramedic networks between May and July 2019. Interviews were conducted by telephone or video call and explored use/anticipated use of prescribing, benefits and challenges to prescribing and support for the prescribing role. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes.

RESULTS

Of the 17 participants, six were currently prescribing and the remainder were awaiting annotation. Participants worked in a range of settings, including: primary care, emergency departments, urgent care, walk in centres and rapid response services. Key benefits to prescribing were similar to those reported by other non-doctor prescribers and included: streamlining care for patients, improving safety, improving efficiency and facilitating new advanced clinical practice roles. Key challenges included: administrative IT issues, lack of ability to prescribe controlled drugs and managing patient/colleague expectations around paramedic prescribing. In general, participants felt supported in their prescribing role, both by doctors and other non-doctor prescribers, and felt confident to prescribe following the prescribing course. Concerns were raised about potential isolation in some settings, lack of parity in prescribing legislation across different professions and the way this is taught in prescribing programmes.

CONCLUSION

Indications are that paramedic prescribing is rolling out successfully in line with expectations. Barriers and facilitators are similar to those reported by other non-doctor prescribers and independent prescribing is already an essential component to advanced practitioner roles in settings such as primary care. Findings highlight a need for greater alignment of prescribing legislation across non-doctor prescribers from different professions undertaking advanced roles.

摘要

目的

探讨在英国一系列医疗环境中率先采用独立处方权的护理人员的经历。

方法

在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)英格兰分部2015年进行公众咨询后,于2018年3月做出决定,修订立法以使高级护理人员能够在英国的医疗环境中独立开药。了解这些“早期采用者”的经历将有助于确定护理人员开处方在医疗系统中何处能产生最佳效益,同时也能尽早梳理出实施过程中的挑战以及应对挑战的策略。这项探索性定性研究包括对17名在英国参加了独立处方项目的护理人员进行访谈。2019年5月至7月间,通过社交媒体和地区护理人员网络招募了参与者。通过电话或视频通话进行访谈,探讨了处方的使用/预期使用情况、开处方的益处和挑战以及对处方角色的支持。进行了主题分析以确定关键主题。

结果

17名参与者中,6人目前正在开处方,其余人正在等待注册。参与者工作于一系列环境中,包括:初级保健、急诊科、紧急护理、随诊中心和快速反应服务。开处方的主要益处与其他非医生开处方者所报告的类似,包括:简化患者护理、提高安全性、提高效率以及促进新的高级临床实践角色。主要挑战包括:行政信息技术问题、无法开具管制药品以及管理患者/同事对护理人员开处方的期望。总体而言,参与者感到在开处方角色方面得到了医生和其他非医生开处方者的支持,并且在完成处方课程后有信心开处方。有人对某些环境中可能出现的孤立情况、不同职业开处方立法缺乏平等性以及在处方课程中的教学方式表示担忧。

结论

有迹象表明护理人员开处方正按预期成功推行。障碍和促进因素与其他非医生开处方者所报告的类似,并且独立开处方已经是初级保健等环境中高级从业者角色的重要组成部分。研究结果凸显了不同职业承担高级角色非医生开处方者的开处方立法需要更好地保持一致。

相似文献

1
Early adopters of paramedic prescribing: a qualitative study.护理人员开处方的早期采用者:一项定性研究。
Br Paramed J. 2019 Dec 1;4(3):57. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2019.12.4.3.57.
2
Paramedic independent prescribing: a qualitative study of early adopters in the UK.护理人员独立处方:对英国早期采用者的定性研究。
Br Paramed J. 2021 May 1;6(1):30-37. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.30.
3
Influences on paramedic prescribing: student and prescriber perspectives.对护理人员开处方的影响:学生和开处方者的观点。
Br Paramed J. 2023 Sep 1;8(2):10-17. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2023.9.8.2.10.
4
Comparing independent prescribing to patient group direction use in a general practitioner out-of-hours service: a retrospective cross-sectional service evaluation.在全科医生非工作时间服务中比较独立处方与患者群体指导用药:一项回顾性横断面服务评估。
Br Paramed J. 2024 Sep 1;9(2):21-28. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.21.
5
Providing medicines in emergency and urgent care: a survey of specialist paramedics' experiences of medication supply and views on paramedic independent prescribing.在急诊和紧急护理中提供药品:对专科护理人员药品供应经验及护理人员独立处方观点的调查
Br Paramed J. 2018 Dec 1;3(3):1-9. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2018.12.3.3.1.
6
What are the clinical practice experiences of specialist and advanced paramedics working in emergency department roles? A qualitative study.担任急诊科职位的专科医生和高级护理人员的临床实践经验有哪些?一项定性研究。
Br Paramed J. 2019 Dec 1;4(3):1-7. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2019.12.4.3.1.
7
What influences the effective practice and role optimisation of specialist/advanced paramedics working in emergency departments? A qualitative study.什么因素影响在急诊科工作的专科/高级护理人员的有效实践和角色优化?一项定性研究。
Br Paramed J. 2019 Jun 1;4(1):40-41. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2019.06.4.1.40.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
10
The RESearch PARamedic Experience (RESPARE) study: a qualitative study exploring the experiences of research paramedics working in the United Kingdom.急救护理人员研究经验(RESPARE)研究:一项探索在英国工作的参与研究的急救护理人员经历的定性研究。
Br Paramed J. 2023 Mar 1;7(4):14-22. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2023.3.7.4.14.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of non-medical independent prescribing in primary care in the UK: a qualitative systematic review.英国初级保健中非医疗独立处方实施的障碍和促进因素:定性系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 8;12(6):e052227. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052227.
2
Impact of a Mobile App on Paramedics' Perceived and Physiologic Stress Response During Simulated Prehospital Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Study Nested Within a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.移动应用程序对模拟院前儿科心肺复苏期间护理人员感知和生理应激反应的影响:嵌套在多中心随机对照试验中的研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Oct 7;9(10):e31748. doi: 10.2196/31748.