Suppr超能文献

在全科医生非工作时间服务中比较独立处方与患者群体指导用药:一项回顾性横断面服务评估。

Comparing independent prescribing to patient group direction use in a general practitioner out-of-hours service: a retrospective cross-sectional service evaluation.

作者信息

Stevens Hayley, Mansel Beryl, Cutter Jayne

机构信息

Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8624-5428.

Swansea University ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7747-3004.

出版信息

Br Paramed J. 2024 Sep 1;9(2):21-28. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2024.9.9.2.21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Global demand for healthcare is escalating, prompting exploration of innovative strategies to augment service capacity. Independent prescribing (IP) helps to address this challenge, allowing non-medical professionals to prescribe medication. Paramedics in the UK were granted prescribing privileges in 2018, yet uptake remains low. Despite qualitative evidence indicating that paramedic prescribing is beneficial, quantitative comparisons of medication provision between prescribers and non-prescribers are lacking. Paramedics provide patients with non-emergency medication by three different routes: IP, using a patient group direction (PGD) or with prescriber support.Advanced paramedic practitioners who are not qualified as independent prescribers, rotating through ambulance and general practitioner out-of-hours services, offered an opportunity to quantitatively compare medication supply.

METHODS

This study compares medication supply by three advanced paramedic practitioners using PGDs with three prescribing nurses in a Welsh general practitioner out-of-hours service. A cross-sectional design was employed to retrospectively review electronic patient clinical records between 1 December 2019 and 30 November 2020, including patients presenting with one of five generalised clinical conditions (urinary, soft tissue, respiratory, abdominal pain, ear). Descriptive analysis and non-parametric tests compared medications prescribed or supplied, how patients received medication and reasons for seeking prescriber support.

RESULTS

A total of 397 patient records were analysed. Paramedics supplied medications more frequently with prescriber support (68.2%) than via PGD (27.9%). Nurses predominantly prescribed medication independently (99.3%). Medication provision was comparable when paramedics had prescriber support. Reasons for paramedic support-seeking included having no PGD available (34.1%) and PGD being excluded from use (28.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced paramedic practitioner medication supply using PGDs and prescriber support was comparable to that of prescribing nurse colleagues. However, autonomy restrictions highlight the need for paramedic prescribing in services where prescriber availability is limited. Further research evaluating the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of PGD use versus IP is necessary. Additionally, the qualitative benefits of IP, such as improved patient care and satisfaction, warrant due consideration when implementing future healthcare strategies.

摘要

引言

全球对医疗保健的需求不断升级,促使人们探索创新策略以提高服务能力。独立处方(IP)有助于应对这一挑战,使非医疗专业人员能够开具药物处方。英国护理人员于2018年获得了处方权,但使用率仍然很低。尽管有定性证据表明护理人员开处方是有益的,但缺乏开处方者与非开处方者之间药物供应的定量比较。护理人员通过三种不同途径为患者提供非紧急药物:独立处方、使用患者群体指导(PGD)或在开处方者支持下提供。未具备独立处方资格的高级护理人员从业者,在救护车和全科医生非工作时间服务中轮岗,提供了一个对药物供应进行定量比较的机会。

方法

本研究在威尔士全科医生非工作时间服务中,比较了三名使用PGD的高级护理人员从业者与三名开处方护士的药物供应情况。采用横断面设计,回顾性分析2019年12月1日至2020年11月30日期间的电子患者临床记录,包括患有五种常见临床病症(泌尿系统、软组织、呼吸系统、腹痛、耳部)之一的患者。描述性分析和非参数检验比较了所开处方或供应的药物、患者接受药物的方式以及寻求开处方者支持的原因。

结果

共分析了397份患者记录。护理人员在开处方者支持下供应药物的频率(68.2%)高于通过PGD供应的频率(27.9%)。护士主要独立开处方(99.3%)。当护理人员获得开处方者支持时,药物供应情况相当。护理人员寻求支持的原因包括没有可用的PGD(34.1%)和PGD被排除使用(28.4%)。

结论

使用PGD和开处方者支持的高级护理人员从业者的药物供应与开处方护士同事相当。然而,自主性限制凸显了在开处方者可用性有限的服务中护理人员开处方的必要性。有必要进一步研究评估使用PGD与独立处方的效率和成本效益。此外,在实施未来医疗保健策略时,独立处方的定性益处,如改善患者护理和满意度,值得充分考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef3d/11376321/b950ce063988/BPJ-2024-9-2-21-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验