Whitley Gregory Adam, Hemingway Pippa, Richard Law Graham, Wilson Caitlin, Siriwardena A Niroshan
University of Lincoln: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-6815.
University of Nottingham: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-8166.
Br Paramed J. 2019 Dec 1;4(3):58-59. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2019.12.4.3.58.
Pre-hospital pain management in children is poor, with very few children in pain receiving analgesia. Without effective pain treatment, children may suffer long-term changes in stress hormone responses and pain perception and are at risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder. We aimed to identify predictors of effective management of acute pain in children in the pre-hospital setting.
A retrospective cross-sectional study using electronic clinical records from one large UK ambulance service between 1 October 2017 and 30 September 2018 was performed using multi-variable logistic regression. We included all children < 18 years suffering acute pain. Children with a Glasgow Coma Scale of < 15, no documented pain or without a second pain score were excluded. The outcome measure was effective pain management (abolition or reduction of pain by ≥ 2 out of 10 using the numeric pain rating scale, Wong and Baker FACES scale or Face, Legs, Activity, Crying and Consolability (FLACC) scale).
A total of 2312 patients were included for analysis. Median (IQR) age was 13 (9-16), 54% were male and the cause of pain was trauma in 66% of cases. Predictors of effective pain management include children who were younger (0-5 years) compared to older (12-17 years) (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-2.03), administered analgesia (AOR 2.35; CI 1.94-2.84), attended by a paramedic (AOR 1.39; CI 1.13-1.70) or living in an area of medium deprivation (index of multiple deprivation (IMD) 4-7) compared to children in an area of high deprivation (IMD 1-3) (AOR 1.41; CI 1.10-1.79). Child gender, type of pain, transport time and clinician experience were not significant.
These predictors highlight disparity in effective pre-hospital management of acute pain in children. Qualitative research is needed to help explain these findings.
儿童院前疼痛管理状况不佳,很少有疼痛儿童能得到镇痛治疗。若没有有效的疼痛治疗,儿童可能会出现应激激素反应和疼痛感知的长期变化,并有患创伤后应激障碍的风险。我们旨在确定院前环境中儿童急性疼痛有效管理的预测因素。
采用多变量逻辑回归,对英国一家大型救护车服务机构2017年10月1日至2018年9月30日的电子临床记录进行回顾性横断面研究。我们纳入了所有18岁以下遭受急性疼痛的儿童。格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分<15、无疼痛记录或无第二个疼痛评分的儿童被排除。结局指标是有效的疼痛管理(使用数字疼痛评分量表、面部表情评分量表或面部、腿部、活动、哭闹和安抚度(FLACC)量表,疼痛减轻或消除≥2分(满分10分))。
共纳入2312例患者进行分析。年龄中位数(四分位间距)为13岁(9 - 16岁),54%为男性,66%的疼痛原因是创伤。有效疼痛管理的预测因素包括年龄较小(0 - 5岁)的儿童相比于年龄较大(12 - 17岁)的儿童(调整比值比(AOR)1.57;95%置信区间(CI)1.21 - 2.03)、接受了镇痛治疗(AOR 2.35;CI 1.94 - 2.84)、有护理人员陪同(AOR 1.39;CI 1.13 - 1.70)或生活在中等贫困地区(多重贫困指数(IMD)4 - 7)相比于生活在高贫困地区(IMD 1 - 3)的儿童(AOR 1.41;CI 1.10 - 1.79)。儿童性别、疼痛类型、转运时间和临床医生经验无显著影响。
这些预测因素凸显了儿童院前急性疼痛有效管理方面的差异。需要进行定性研究来帮助解释这些发现。