Suppr超能文献

不同重症监护人员配置模式对成人创伤重症监护病房潜在药物相互作用发生率的影响。

The effect of different intensivist staffing patterns on the rate of potential drug-drug interactions in adult trauma intensive care units.

作者信息

Masjedi Mansoor, Mirjalili Mahtabalsadat, Mirzaei Ehsan, Mirzaee Hadis, Vazin Afsaneh

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Fars, Iran.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Fars, Iran.

出版信息

Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020 Dec 28;11:2042098620980640. doi: 10.1177/2042098620980640. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) have created alarming challenges for public health, especially in those admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Many studies have shown that involvement of intensivists in the ICUs improves the outcome and decreases the treatment costs. The effect of academic non-academic (therapeutic) intensivist as well as hours of coverage and attendance of intensivist on potential DDIs (pDDIs) was evaluated in six adult trauma ICUs of a level one trauma center.

METHODS

In this 6-month cross-sectional study, 200 patients were included. The DDIs were classified into five groups, including type A, B, C, D, and X. pDDIs were defined as interactions belonged to C, D and X categories. Patients in six adult ICUs with three different patterns of intensivist staffing models including type A (once-daily therapeutic intensivist visit followed by 24 h on-call), B (twice-daily academic intensivist visit, 8 h of attendance in ICU and 16 h on-call) and C (all criteria just like ICU type B, except for the presence of therapeutic instead of academic intensivist) were screened for pDDIs.

RESULTS

In total, 3735 drug orders and 3869 drugs (193 different types) were screened and 1826 pDDIs were identified. Type C, D and X interactions accounted for 60.6%, 35.5%, and 3.9% of all pDDIs, respectively. The mean of pDDI per patient was significantly higher (-value < 0.001) in the ICU type A than ICU types C and B. The frequency of pDDIs was the highest in the type A ICUs. A statistically significant relationship was observed between the number of prescribed drugs and ICU length of stay (-value < 0.001 and  = 0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Different patterns of intensivist staffing affect pDDIs to varying degrees. In the studied ICUs academic therapeutic intensivist, twice once-daily visit, and 8 h attendance with16 h on-call 24 h on-call were associated with more reductions in pDDIs.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

The impact of different intensivist staffing patterns in ICUs on the rate of potential drug-drug interactionsDrug-drug interactions (DDIs) have created alarming challenges for public health, especially in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Many studies have shown that involvement of intensivists in the ICUs improves the outcome and limits the costs. Considering the high incidence of potential DDIs (pDDIs) occurring for critically ill patients and the importance of ADRs caused by pDDIs in ICUs, the effect of the presence of an academic versus therapeutic intensivist, as well as the hour of coverage of intensivist on prevalence of pDDIs was evaluated in six adult trauma ICUs of a level one trauma center in Shiraz, Iran. We also determined the prevalence of pDDIs and their associated risk factors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has assessed the effect of various ICU physician staffing models on the incidence and pattern of pDDIs.

摘要

背景

药物相互作用(DDIs)给公共卫生带来了令人担忧的挑战,尤其是在重症监护病房(ICU)的患者中。许多研究表明,重症监护医生参与ICU治疗可改善治疗结果并降低治疗成本。在一家一级创伤中心的六个成人创伤ICU中,评估了学术型与非学术型(治疗型)重症监护医生以及重症监护医生的覆盖时长和出诊时间对潜在药物相互作用(pDDIs)的影响。

方法

在这项为期6个月的横断面研究中,纳入了200名患者。DDIs被分为A、B、C、D和X五类。pDDIs被定义为属于C、D和X类别的相互作用。对六个成人ICU中采用三种不同重症监护医生人员配置模式的患者进行筛选,以确定pDDIs,这三种模式包括:A型(每日一次治疗型重症监护医生查房,随后24小时随叫随到)、B型(每日两次学术型重症监护医生查房,在ICU出诊8小时,随叫随到16小时)和C型(所有标准与B型ICU相同,但为治疗型重症监护医生而非学术型)。

结果

总共筛选了3735条医嘱和3869种药物(193种不同类型),并识别出1826种pDDIs。C类、D类和X类相互作用分别占所有pDDIs的60.6%、35.5%和3.9%。A型ICU中每位患者的pDDI均值显著高于C型和B型ICU(p值<0.001)。A型ICU中pDDIs的发生率最高。在使用药物数量与ICU住院时长之间观察到统计学上的显著关系(p值分别<0.001和 = 0.009)。

结论

不同的重症监护医生人员配置模式对pDDIs有不同程度的影响。在所研究的ICU中,学术型与治疗型重症监护医生、每日两次而非一次查房以及8小时出诊加16小时随叫随到(而非24小时随叫随到)与pDDIs的更多减少相关。

通俗易懂的总结

ICU中不同重症监护医生人员配置模式对潜在药物相互作用发生率的影响

药物相互作用(DDIs)给公共卫生带来了令人担忧的挑战,尤其是在入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者中。许多研究表明,重症监护医生参与ICU治疗可改善治疗结果并控制成本。鉴于重症患者中潜在药物相互作用(pDDIs)的高发生率以及pDDIs在ICU中导致的药物不良反应的重要性,在伊朗设拉子一家一级创伤中心的六个成人创伤ICU中,评估了学术型与治疗型重症监护医生在场的影响以及重症监护医生的覆盖时长对pDDIs患病率的影响。我们还确定了pDDIs的患病率及其相关危险因素。据我们所知,这是第一项评估各种ICU医生人员配置模式对pDDIs发生率和模式影响的研究。

相似文献

7
Nighttime intensivist staffing and mortality among critically ill patients.危重症患者夜间 intensivist 配备与死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2093-101. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1201918. Epub 2012 May 21.

本文引用的文献

2
Interprofessional Care and Teamwork in the ICU.重症监护病房中的跨专业护理和团队合作。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):980-990. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003067.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验