Li Jun Kang, Wang Huan Fan, He Yan, Huang Yong, Liu Gang, Wang Zhi Li
Department of Ultrasound, Chinese People's Liberation Army 63820 Hospital, Mianyang, China.
Department of Ultrasound, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai, China.
Gland Surg. 2020 Dec;9(6):1945-1954. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-428.
The purpose of this paper is to clarify the ultrasonographic features and classification of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and to evaluate the ability of ultrasonography in the prediction of DCIS.
The clinical data, gray-scale ultrasound images and pathological results of 219 DCIS lesions that detected in 203 consecutive patients who underwent ultrasonography and surgery in our hospital from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2019 were collected retrospectively. Ultrasonographic features and classification of DCIS were summarized, and the accuracy of ultrasonography in predicting different ultrasonographic findings of DCIS were compared.
Among the 219 DCIS lesions, 91 (41.6%) presented as mass-like lesions and 128 (58.4%) were non-mass-like lesions. For the 91 mass-like DCIS lesions, 79 were hypoechoic solid masses, 12 were cystic-solid structures. For the 128 non-mass-like DCIS lesions, 114 were hypoechoic areas, 10 were ductal dilatation accompanied with intraductal solid components, and 4 were multiple punctate echogenic foci only. The diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for the 219 DCIS lesions was 81.7% (179/219). The diagnostic accuracy of mass-like DCIS lesions was 90.1% (82/91), which was significantly higher than that in non-mass-like DCIS lesions [75.8% (97/128), P=0.007]. The diagnostic accuracy of hypoechoic solid masses was significantly higher than those of the other ultrasonographic findings (P=0.002). Ducts abnormalities were detected in 45 (20.5%) lesions and punctate echogenic foci in 134 (61.2%) lesions. The diagnostic accuracy of lesions with ducts abnormalities was 93.3% (42/45), which was significantly higher than that in lesions without ducts abnormalities [78.7% (137/174), P=0.024]. The diagnostic accuracy of lesions with punctate echogenic foci was 92.5% (124/134), which was significantly higher than that in lesions without punctate echogenic foci [64.7% (55/85), P=0.000].
DCIS lesions can effectively be recognized as mass-like lesions and non-mass-like lesions by ultrasound. Hypoechoic areas and hypoechoic solid masses were the most common ultrasonographic features of DCIS. Ducts abnormalities and punctate echogenic foci were helpful for the diagnosis of DCIS.
本文旨在阐明导管原位癌(DCIS)的超声特征及分类,并评估超声对DCIS的预测能力。
回顾性收集2014年1月1日至2019年12月31日在我院接受超声检查及手术的203例连续患者中检测出的219个DCIS病灶的临床资料、灰阶超声图像及病理结果。总结DCIS的超声特征及分类,并比较超声对DCIS不同超声表现的预测准确性。
在219个DCIS病灶中,91个(41.6%)表现为肿块样病灶,128个(58.4%)为非肿块样病灶。对于91个肿块样DCIS病灶,79个为低回声实性肿块,12个为囊实性结构。对于128个非肿块样DCIS病灶,114个为低回声区,10个为导管扩张伴管腔内实性成分,4个仅为多个点状强回声灶。超声对219个DCIS病灶的诊断准确率为81.7%(179/219)。肿块样DCIS病灶的诊断准确率为90.1%(82/91),显著高于非肿块样DCIS病灶[75.8%(97/128),P=0.007]。低回声实性肿块的诊断准确率显著高于其他超声表现(P=0.002)。45个(20.5%)病灶检测到导管异常,134个(61.2%)病灶检测到点状强回声灶。有导管异常病灶的诊断准确率为93.3%(42/45),显著高于无导管异常病灶[�8.7%(137/174),P=0.024]。有点状强回声灶病灶的诊断准确率为92.5%(124/134),显著高于无点状强回声灶病灶[64.7%(55/85),P=0.000]。
超声可有效识别DCIS病灶为肿块样病灶和非肿块样病灶。低回声区和低回声实性肿块是DCIS最常见的超声特征。导管异常和点状强回声灶有助于DCIS的诊断。