Suppr超能文献

[革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性脓毒症患者外周血单核细胞中的主控基因与共表达网络分析]

[Master genes and co-expression network analysis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with gram-positive and gram-negative sepsis].

作者信息

Li Lu, Fang Junjun, Li Zhitao, Shen Leixing, Wang Guobin, Fu Shuiqiao

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.

Surgical Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China.

出版信息

Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Dec 25;49(6):732-742. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.12.08.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the functional pathways enriched and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with gram-positive and gram-negative sepsis.

METHODS

Dataset GSE9960 obtained from NCBI GEO database containing PBMC samples from 16 non-infectious systematic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) patients, 17 gram-positive septic patients and 18 gram-negative septic patients were included in the study. Functional pathway annotations were conducted by gene set enrichment analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis. DEGs were filtered and master DEGs were then validated in PBMCs of gram-positive septic, gram-negative septic and non-infectious SIRS patients.

RESULTS

The enriched gene sets in gram-positive sepsis and gram-negative sepsis were significantly different. The results indicated the opposite co-expression networks in SIRS and gram-negative sepsis, and the entirely different co-expression networks in gram-positive and gram-negative sepsis. Furthermore, we validated that was up-regulated in gram-positive sepsis (<0.05), was down-regulated in gram-negative sepsis (<0.01), while was up-regulated in gram-negative sepsis (<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that there are differences in the mechanism and pathogenesis of gram-positive and gram-negative sepsis, which may provide potential markers for sepsis diagnosis and empirical antimicrobial therapy.

摘要

目的

研究革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌败血症患者外周血单核细胞(PBMC)中富集的功能通路及差异表达基因(DEG)。

方法

从NCBI GEO数据库获取数据集GSE9960,该数据集包含16例非感染性全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)患者、17例革兰氏阳性菌败血症患者和18例革兰氏阴性菌败血症患者的PBMC样本。通过基因集富集分析和加权基因共表达网络分析进行功能通路注释。筛选DEG,然后在革兰氏阳性菌败血症、革兰氏阴性菌败血症和非感染性SIRS患者的PBMC中验证主要DEG。

结果

革兰氏阳性菌败血症和革兰氏阴性菌败血症中富集的基因集显著不同。结果表明SIRS和革兰氏阴性菌败血症中的共表达网络相反,而革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌败血症中的共表达网络完全不同。此外,我们验证了[具体基因名称1]在革兰氏阳性菌败血症中上调(<0.05),[具体基因名称2]在革兰氏阴性菌败血症中下调(<0.01),而[具体基因名称3]在革兰氏阴性菌败血症中上调(<0.05)。

结论

结果表明革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌败血症的机制和发病机制存在差异,这可能为败血症诊断和经验性抗菌治疗提供潜在标志物。

相似文献

9
Differential Gene Sets Profiling in Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Sepsis.革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌脓毒症的差异基因集分析。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Feb 9;12:801232. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.801232. eCollection 2022.
10
[Sepsis--pathogenesis].[脓毒症——发病机制]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2000 May 15;162(20):2855-8.

本文引用的文献

8
Transcriptomic correlates of organ failure extent in sepsis.脓毒症器官衰竭程度的转录组学相关性。
J Infect. 2015 May;70(5):445-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.12.010. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验