Suga H, Goto Y, Yasumura Y, Nozawa T, Futaki S, Tanaka N, Uenishi M
Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Am J Physiol. 1988 Feb;254(2 Pt 2):H292-303. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1988.254.2.H292.
We compared the effects of decreased coronary perfusion pressure (CP) and propranolol on the relation between left ventricular O2 consumption (VO2) and systolic pressure-volume area (PVA). PVA represents total mechanical energy generated by contraction and is the area under the end-systolic pressure-volume (PV) line and systolic PV trajectory. In excised cross-circulated dog hearts, a decrease in CP from 82 (mean) to 51 mmHg decreased ventricular contractility index Emax (slope of end-systolic PV relation) by 17% (P less than 0.05) and slightly (P less than 0.05 in 3 of 11 hearts) lowered the VO2-PVA relation in a parallel fashion. A further decrease in CP to 32 mmHg decreased Emax by 56% (P less than 0.05) and considerably (P less than 0.05) lowered the VO2-PVA relation by decreasing both the VO2-axis intercept by 26% (P less than 0.05) and the slope by 24% (P less than 0.05) from control. Propranolol decreased Emax by 48% (P less than 0.05) and the VO2-axis intercept by 25% (P less than 0.05) without changing the slope (P greater than 0.05). We attributed the different response of the VO2-PVA relation to the difference of the coronary O2 supply-demand balance between decreased CP and propranolol.