Suppr超能文献

外科住院医师使用便携式超声即时诊断气胸。

Immediate Pneumothorax Diagnosis by Surgical Residents Using Portable Ultrasound.

机构信息

37601 Department of Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot and The Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.

37601 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot and The Hebrew University Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Innovations (Phila). 2021 Mar-Apr;16(2):152-156. doi: 10.1177/1556984520978315. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Feasibility of diagnosis of pneumothorax using handheld ultrasound by non-radiologists shows inconsistent results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of portable ultrasound for immediate diagnosis of pneumothorax by general surgery residents who underwent short training.

METHODS

Patients who presented to the emergency department of a university hospital with suspected pneumothorax between 10/2018 and 12/2019 were included in the study. Patients underwent ultrasound in 2 points of each hemithorax. Sensitivity and specificity for pneumothorax diagnosis by ultrasound and physical examination were calculated and compared with chest computed tomography (CT). Patients in whom a chest tube was placed prior to ultrasound examination and those who did not undergo a CT scan were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 40.7 ± 20.2 years. Pneumothorax was found among 46 patients (54%) per chest CT, and of these, 21 (46%) underwent chest tube placement following imaging. Ultrasound showed the highest sensitivity and specificity (95.6% [95% confidence interval {CI} 85.16% to 99.47%] and 97.44% [95% CI 86.40% to 99.67%], respectively). Chest x-ray had the lowest sensitivity (47.8% [95% CI 32.89% to 63.05%]) for pneumothorax detection. Physical examination showed a moderate sensitivity and specificity (82.6% [95% CI 68.58% to 92.18%] and 77.89% [95% CI 60.67% to 88.87%], respectively) for the diagnosis of pneumothorax.

CONCLUSIONS

We found high accuracy rates of 2-point ultrasound in immediate pneumothorax diagnosis when performed by surgical residents who underwent a short ultrasound training. This is a fast and repeatable test, and has the potential for successful implementation in prehospital and military scenarios as well, minimizing unnecessary chest tube placements.

摘要

目的

非放射科医生使用手持式超声诊断气胸的可行性结果不一致。本研究旨在评估经过短期培训的普通外科住院医师即时诊断气胸的便携式超声的可行性和准确性。

方法

本研究纳入了 2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 12 月期间因疑似气胸而到大学医院急诊科就诊的患者。对每个患者的两侧胸部各进行 2 个点的超声检查。计算超声和体格检查对气胸诊断的敏感性和特异性,并与胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)进行比较。排除在超声检查前放置胸腔引流管和未行 CT 扫描的患者。

结果

共有 85 名患者符合纳入标准。平均年龄为 40.7 ± 20.2 岁。胸部 CT 发现气胸 46 例(54%),其中 21 例(46%)在影像检查后放置了胸腔引流管。超声检查的敏感性和特异性最高(分别为 95.6%[95%置信区间 85.16%至 99.47%]和 97.44%[95%置信区间 86.40%至 99.67%])。胸部 X 线对气胸的检测敏感性最低(47.8%[95%置信区间 32.89%至 63.05%])。体格检查对气胸的诊断具有中等的敏感性和特异性(分别为 82.6%[95%置信区间 68.58%至 92.18%]和 77.89%[95%置信区间 60.67%至 88.87%])。

结论

我们发现,经过短期超声培训的外科住院医师进行的 2 点超声检查对即时气胸诊断具有较高的准确性。这是一种快速且可重复的检查方法,有可能在院前和军事环境中成功实施,最大限度地减少不必要的胸腔引流管放置。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验