使用基于地理位置的社交网络应用与男男性行为者的 HIV 风险行为:病例交叉研究。

Use of Geosocial Networking Apps and HIV Risk Behavior Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Case-Crossover Study.

机构信息

Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 15;7(1):e17173. doi: 10.2196/17173.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

HIV disproportionately affects men who have sex with men (MSM) in China. The HIV epidemic is largely driven by unprotected anal sex (ie, sex not protected by condoms or HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis [PrEP]). The possible association between unprotected anal sex and the use of geospatial networking apps has been the subject of scientific debate.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed whether users of a gay geospatial networking app in China were more likely to use condoms when they met their partners online versus offline. A case-crossover analysis, with each person serving as his own control, was employed to address the potential bias that men looking for sex partners through an online dating medium might have inherently different (and riskier) patterns of sexual behavior than men who do not use online dating media.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was administered in 2018 to adult male users of Blued-a gay geospatial networking app-in Beijing, Tianjin, Sichuan, and Yunnan, China. A case-crossover analysis was conducted among 1311 MSM not taking PrEP who reported engaging in both unprotected and protected anal sex in the previous 6 months. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to quantify the association between where the partnership was initiated (offline or online) and the act of unprotected anal sex, controlling for other interval-level covariates. Four sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess other potential sources of bias.

RESULTS

We identified 1311 matched instances where a person reported having both an unprotected anal sex act and a protected anal sex act in the previous 6 months. Of the most recent unprotected anal sex acts, 22.3% (292/1311), were initiated offline. Of the most recent protected anal sex acts, 16.3% (214/1311), were initiated offline. In multivariable analyses, initiating a partnership offline was positively associated with unprotected anal sex (odds ratio 2.66, 95% CI 1.84 to 3.85, P<.001) compared with initiating a partnership online. These results were robust to each of the different sensitivity analyses we conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

Among Blued users in 4 Chinese cities, men were less likely to have unprotected anal sex in partnerships that they initiated online compared with those that they initiated offline. The relationship was strong, with over 2.5 times the likelihood of engaging in unprotected anal sex in partnerships initiated offline compared with those initiated online. These findings suggest that geospatial networking apps are a proxy for, and not a cause of, high-risk behaviors for HIV infection; these platforms should be viewed as a useful venue to identify individuals at risk for HIV transmission to allow for targeted service provision.

摘要

背景

艾滋病毒在中国不成比例地影响着男男性行为者(MSM)。艾滋病毒疫情在很大程度上是由无保护的肛交(即未使用安全套或 HIV 暴露前预防 [PrEP] 进行保护的性行为)驱动的。无保护的肛交与使用地理空间网络应用程序之间的可能关联一直是科学争论的主题。

目的

本研究评估了在中国使用同性恋地理空间网络应用程序的用户,与线下相比,当他们在网上与伴侣见面时,使用安全套的可能性是否更大。采用病例交叉分析,每个人都作为自己的对照,以解决通过在线约会媒介寻找性伴侣的男性可能具有与不使用在线约会媒介的男性不同(且风险更高)的性行为模式的潜在偏差。

方法

2018 年,在中国北京、天津、四川和云南的 Blued-一个同性恋地理空间网络应用程序-成年男性用户中进行了横断面调查。对 1311 名未服用 PrEP 的报告在过去 6 个月内同时进行过无保护和保护肛交的男男性行为者进行病例交叉分析。多变量条件逻辑回归用于量化在何处开始伙伴关系(线下或线上)与无保护肛交行为之间的关联,同时控制其他间隔水平协变量。进行了四项敏感性分析,以评估其他潜在的偏倚来源。

结果

我们确定了 1311 个匹配的实例,其中一个人报告在过去 6 个月内同时进行了无保护的肛交行为和保护的肛交行为。在最近的无保护肛交行为中,22.3%(292/1311)是线下发起的。在最近的保护肛交行为中,16.3%(214/1311)是线下发起的。在多变量分析中,与在线发起伙伴关系相比,线下发起伙伴关系与无保护肛交呈正相关(比值比 2.66,95%置信区间 1.84 至 3.85,P<.001)。这些结果在我们进行的每项不同的敏感性分析中都是稳健的。

结论

在中国 4 个城市的 Blued 用户中,与线下发起的伙伴关系相比,男性在线上发起的伙伴关系中进行无保护肛交的可能性较小。这种关系很强,线下发起的伙伴关系中进行无保护肛交的可能性比线上发起的伙伴关系高 2.5 倍以上。这些发现表明,地理空间网络应用程序是 HIV 感染高风险行为的代表,而不是原因;这些平台应被视为识别有 HIV 传播风险的个体的有用场所,以便提供有针对性的服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0256/7846440/575478060dae/publichealth_v7i1e17173_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索