Suppr超能文献

最近批准的自动胰岛素输送系统对老年 1 型糖尿病患者血糖、睡眠和心理社会结局的影响:一项初步研究。

The Impact of a Recently Approved Automated Insulin Delivery System on Glycemic, Sleep, and Psychosocial Outcomes in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 May;16(3):663-669. doi: 10.1177/1932296820986879. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults with type 1 diabetes (≥65 years) are often under-represented in clinical trials of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems. We sought to test the efficacy of a recently FDA-approved AID system in this population.

METHODS

Participants with type 1 diabetes used sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy for four weeks and then used an AID system (Control-IQ) for four weeks. In addition to glucose control variables, patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were assessed with questionnaires and sleep parameters were assessed by actigraphy.

RESULTS

Fifteen older adults (mean age 68.7 ± 3.3, HbA1c of 7.0 ± 0.8) completed the pilot trial. Glycemic outcomes improved during AID compared to SAP. During AID use, mean glucose was 146.0 mg/dL; mean percent time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL) was 79.6%; median time below 70 mg/dL was 1.1%. The AID system was in use 92.6% ± 7.0% of the time. Compared to SAP, while participants were on AID the TIR increased significantly (+10%, = .002) accompanied by a reduction in both time above 180 mg/dL (-6.9%, = .005) and below 70 mg/dl (-0.4%, = .053). Diabetes-related distress decreased significantly while using AID ( = .028), but sleep parameters remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of this AID system in older adults improved glycemic control with high scores in ease of use, trust, and usability. Participants reported an improvement in diabetes distress with AID use. There were no significant changes in sleep.

摘要

背景

年龄在 65 岁及以上的 1 型糖尿病患者在自动化胰岛素输送(AID)系统的临床试验中往往代表性不足。我们旨在检验最近获得 FDA 批准的 AID 系统在该人群中的疗效。

方法

参与者使用传感器增强型胰岛素泵(SAP)治疗四周,然后使用 AID 系统(Control-IQ)治疗四周。除了血糖控制变量外,还通过问卷评估患者报告的结果(PRO),并通过活动记录仪评估睡眠参数。

结果

15 名老年参与者(平均年龄 68.7 ± 3.3 岁,HbA1c 为 7.0 ± 0.8)完成了这项初步试验。与 SAP 相比,AID 期间的血糖控制得到改善。在使用 AID 期间,平均血糖为 146.0mg/dL;平均时间在目标范围内(TIR,70-180mg/dL)为 79.6%;中位数血糖低于 70mg/dL 的时间为 1.1%。AID 系统的使用率为 92.6%±7.0%。与 SAP 相比,当参与者使用 AID 时,TIR 显著增加(+10%, =.002),同时 180mg/dL 以上的时间减少(-6.9%, =.005)和 70mg/dl 以下的时间减少(-0.4%, =.053)。使用 AID 时,糖尿病相关困扰显著降低( =.028),但睡眠参数保持不变。

结论

在老年人中使用这种 AID 系统可改善血糖控制,且易用性、信任度和可用性方面的评分较高。参与者报告使用 AID 后糖尿病困扰有所改善。睡眠没有明显变化。

相似文献

7
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun;19(S3):S25-S37. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0035.
8
Outpatient Randomized Crossover Automated Insulin Delivery Versus Conventional Therapy with Induced Stress Challenges.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 May;24(5):338-349. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0436. Epub 2022 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
One-year evaluation of automated insulin delivery systems in adults with type 1 diabetes.
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jul 1;7:1596188. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1596188. eCollection 2025.
2
Research Gaps, Challenges, and Opportunities in Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jul;19(4):937-949. doi: 10.1177/19322968251338754. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
4
Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy After Initiation of Automated Insulin Delivery System in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Feb 14:19322968251318740. doi: 10.1177/19322968251318740.
6
Diabetes Technology Use in Special Populations: A Narrative Review of Psychosocial Factors.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan;19(1):34-46. doi: 10.1177/19322968241296853. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
8
Psychosocial Aspects of Diabetes Technologies: Commentary on the Current Status of the Evidence and Suggestions for Future Directions.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jan;19(1):27-33. doi: 10.1177/19322968241276550. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
9
Effect of automated insulin delivery systems on person-reported outcomes in people with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Sep 21;76:102852. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102852. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
Patient-reported outcomes in studies of diabetes technology: What matters.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Dec;26 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):59-73. doi: 10.1111/dom.15858. Epub 2024 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

2
Evening and overnight closed-loop control versus 24/7 continuous closed-loop control for type 1 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial.
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Feb;2(2):e64-e73. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30218-3. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
3
Randomized Controlled Trial of Mobile Closed-Loop Control.
Diabetes Care. 2020 Mar;43(3):607-615. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1310. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
Six-Month Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 31;381(18):1707-1717. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907863. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
8
Successful At-Home Use of the Tandem Control-IQ Artificial Pancreas System in Young Children During a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Apr;21(4):159-169. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0011. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
10
Sleep in Type 1 Diabetes: Implications for Glycemic Control and Diabetes Management.
Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Feb 5;18(2):5. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-0974-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验